Govt response to Online Harms consultation threatens freedom of speech and innovation, says IEA expert
The IEA’s Head of Regulatory Affairs Victoria Hewson commented on the government’s initial response to the public consultation on the Online Harms White Paper
“At a time when the Chancellor is challenging businesses to come up with ways of cutting red tape, it is disappointing to see other government departments intent on creating it.
“Everyone wants children and vulnerable people to be safe and terrorism to be tackled but handing power over what people are allowed to say and see online to a regulator is not a proportionate way to achieve this.
“The assertion that this development will “provide the certainty that business needs to flourish and innovate” is dubious. As we have seen with other recent interventions in the digital sector like the GDPR, legislators massively underestimated the costs of implementation and the impact on competition and innovation has been serious. These measures will require guidance and rule making from a regulator undertaking new responsibilities, which is likely to create uncertainty, causing platforms to adopt risk-averse procedures and crack down on legal content.
“A vague duty on Ofcom to “pay due regard to safeguarding free speech” offers little consolation, and giving such powers to an independent regulator, with no clarity as to how its decisions can be appealed and challenged, threatens fundamental rights and the rule of law.
“The government is getting ahead of themselves by suggesting who the regulator will be before they have published the full consultation response on the substance of the proposed law. This disjointed approach does not inspire confidence that a rigourous process is being followed.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager | 07715 942 731
For further reading from Victoria on the Online Harms White Paper, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
Covid crisis has exacerbated many weaknesses in government, finds IfG's annual Whitehall Monitor report28/01/2021 12:35:00
Whitehall Monitor 2021, published by the Institute for Government, reveals the way the pandemic has changed how the government takes decisions, spends money and makes policy.
IFS - 1.5 million currently excluded from claiming SEISS could easily be supported by government at modest cost28/01/2021 11:35:00
The government has provided huge amounts of financial support to working people since the start of the pandemic, with its furlough scheme for employees forecast to cost £62bn in 2020-21 and the self-employment income support scheme (SEISS) forecast to cost £21bn up to January 2021, with expected costs of up to a further £7 billion to cover the period from February to April 2021.
The King's Fund responds to UK Covid-19 deaths exceeding 100,00028/01/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund responded to the latest data on Covid-19 deaths in the UK
Unemployment “remains low” despite grim headlines, says IEA expert28/01/2021 09:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the latest unemployment figures published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
IFS - Tax system discourages employment, investment and risk-taking. It needs reform.26/01/2021 11:35:00
Employees’ salaries currently attract thousands of pounds more in tax each year than the incomes of people who are self-employed or working through their own company. This is unfair and pushes people towards working through their own business rather than as employees. At the same time, the tax system discourages investing in a company and taking risks.
JRF - Cutting the lifeline now would be the wrong decision26/01/2021 10:35:00
If the Chancellor wants to wrap the nation’s arms around families facing a long period of financial insecurity he would keep the £20 for a further year rather than cut benefits and give a lump sum, ensuring that everyone who needs support during the year can benefit.
IEA - Oxfam’s proposals demonstrate “misunderstanding of economics and poverty relief”26/01/2021 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood comments on "The Inequality Virus" report
National League should suspend the season “with immediate effect”, says IEA expert21/01/2021 10:35:00
Statement by Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs