HEPI - Better assessment impresses students but COVID 19 impacts their overall perceptions of value for money
Students are working harder, in smaller classes with more contact hours.
A significant and positive shift in students’ experiences of assessment and feedback is a standout finding from this year’s annual Student Academic Experience Survey (SAES) by Jonathan Neves and Rachel Hewitt, published today by Advance HE and the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI).
The findings include:
- 26% of students feel their overall academic experience is better than expected across the board – a strong increase of 6% from last year
- Students are much more likely to cite the quality of feedback as a main reason that their experience was better than expected (37% compared to 29% last year). Students note, in particular, improvements in staff feeding back on draft work and the amount of time staff allocate to commenting on work. 36% of students have their assignments returned within two weeks on average – an increase on 30% last year
- Among students whose experience was better than expected, 39% say this was because of support provided for independent study – an increase of 3% on last year.
Students are working harder, with more weekly contact on average (13.9 hours in 2019 and 14.6 in 2020) and more independent study (13.8 hours in 2019 and 14.1 in 2020).
In another positive indicator of an improving academic experience, class sizes are reducing. Students are spending fewer hours in large classes (51–100 / 101+ other students). Significantly more time is being spent in medium-sized classes (16–50), and there is also a growth in the time being spent in the smallest classes of all (0–5 / 6–15).
The recent trend of improvement in perceptions of value-for-money – 2017 to 2019 inclusive ̶ has not been maintained. This year, the number of students reporting ‘good or very good’ value has declined from 41% in 2019 to 39%. However, the data suggest COVID-19 has had a negative impact on students’ academic experience. Those students who completed the survey from 16 March 2020 onwards were less positive (38% reporting they received ‘good’ or ‘very good’ value) than those who reported before that date (40%). Furthermore, some of the earlier fieldwork coincided with strikes in the sector, and students have reflected in their free-standing comments that the industrial action, as well as COVID-19, influenced their responses.
In a new question this year, students were asked about the main drivers in their decision to go to university. By far the two most significant drivers are ‘to get on the career ladder’ (53%) and ‘to follow interest in a subject’ (47%). Notably, social considerations, such as ‘all my friends are going to university’ (9%), are not strong drivers in decisions to go into higher education.
Other new questions in the Survey focus on the use of technology. Ninety per cent of students report basic technology is used in their teaching but where advanced technology is used (7%), significantly more students say they would choose the same course and university again – a strong endorsement of how using the right technology, which complements the subject matter, can make a material difference to how students view their experiences.
Alison Johns, Chief Executive of Advance HE, said, “I am delighted and encouraged to see that student feedback on assessment, in particular, has improved along with many other areas of the student academic experience. This follows a great deal of hard work across the whole sector.
“It is a continuing and very significant concern that BAME students are still reporting less positively than White students. I am determined and committed to supporting the sector in addressing these issues through our work in equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI), particularly through the Race Equality Charter. All students should have equal opportunity to enjoy a positive experience and look with hope to their future prospects. It also remains a considerable worry that wellbeing has not improved in particular for LGB+ students. I know institutions are trying hard to tackle these issues and we can all do more working in close partnership.
“We should also carefully note that students express very important views on educational technology. We aim to feed this into our work to support the sector as it transforms to the new environment and challenges brought about by the Coronavirus pandemic.”
Nick Hillman, Director of HEPI, said, “There has never been a more important moment to ask students what they think. Over the past year, they have witnessed industrial action, a global health crisis and a much tougher labour market. They have responded in the best way possible, by working harder than in the past.
“Nonetheless, many students are worried about their own lives, with further falls in wellbeing this year. Some groups, such as Black, disabled and LGB+ students, give less positive responses and need more support.
“The pandemic means institutions are having to change what they do. Although resources will be squeezed, it is vital that they continue listening to all students as they prepare for the next academic year.”
The Student Academic Experience Survey has been running since 2006 and is widely used to support policy and practice changes. This year SAES collected the views of 10,227 full-time undergraduate students studying in the UK. The authors are Jonathan Neves, Head of Business Intelligence & Surveys Advance HE, and Rachel Hewitt, Director of Policy and Advocacy, HEPI.
The full report is attached.
Notes to editors:
For further information, please contact
Latest News from
Civitas - Study finds over 80% CofE dioceses appoint clergy who advocate racial justice activist claims & over 70% promoting climate activism – marking Church’s ‘separation of the head from the body’10/06/2021 11:35:00
In a new report, researchers have set out to investigate the scale of support for ultra-progressive radical activist agendas alleging ‘systemic racism’ in English society, the understanding and use of ‘unconscious biases’ and prescribing a ‘climate emergency’ doctrine within the Church of England.
‘Special relationship’ can thrive if UK forges new green trade agenda with US at G7 summit – IPPR report10/06/2021 10:35:00
Ahead of the G7 leaders’ summit in Cornwall, the IPPR think tank is urging the UK to spearhead efforts to rewrite the rules of global trade.
IEA - “Social distancing rules must go on 21st June”: IEA expert responds to ONS data on UK pubs and bars sector10/06/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to figures from the Office for National Statistics showing that 55 per cent of pub staff are still furloughed and only 24 per cent of pub owners have “high confidence” that their business will survive the next three months
‘Bitter irony’ that health and care staff are made ill by their work: The King’s Fund response to the Commons Committee report on workforce burnout and resilience08/06/2021 11:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, responded to the Health and Social Care Committee report on workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care
Adam Smith Inst - Aussies & Brits tell Govts: Get trade deal done08/06/2021 10:35:00
A new poll from the free market think tank the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) and research and strategy firm at C|T Group RSR has found Brits and Australians want to expand trade and secure a comprehensive deal.
G7 Tax Agreement: IPPR says countries can still go further to end ‘race to the bottom’ on tax08/06/2021 09:35:00
IPPR - New developments must prioritise environmental and community needs, say locals on Thurrock climate jury04/06/2021 15:10:00
Local people should have more meaningful ways to shape planning and development decisions to ensure environmental and community needs are met, according to 20 Thurrock residents participating in an innovative climate citizens’ jury.
IFS - Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality were growing for adults pre-pandemic, but falling for young children04/06/2021 14:10:00
Inequalities in mortality rates by socioeconomic position had been rising in England prior to the pandemic, both for men and women.
IEA - Advertising regulation a “threat” we cannot ignore, says new research02/06/2021 14:15:00
New research from the Institute of Economic Affairs warns we have sleepwalked into wide-ranging restrictions on advertising – and that it may not be long before there is pressure to ban certain types of expression and imagery in the arts, entertainment and politics.