Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Higher education market not working in interests of students or taxpayers
The Public Accounts Committee report finds no evidence greater competition between providers will improve quality of education they provide.
- Read the report summary
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: The higher education market
Planned-for competition did not emerge
The Government has recently introduced changes to the regulation of higher education to address concerns that students were not always getting a good service.
The original aim of introducing a market into higher education was that student choice and competition between providers would improve quality and value for money. In reality the planned-for competition did not emerge.
Most students are teenagers when they apply and are too often not getting the right advice and support they need. Decisions made in year 9 can have a serious impact on the choices young people are able to make when applying to universities and yet we were not convinced that the myriad of careers initiatives generated by Government are leading to demonstrably better advice for individual pupils.
Shorter degree courses and part-time courses have not emerged
Shorter degree courses and part-time courses have also not emerged. A number of Government policies are aimed at widening participation in higher education and this has to be a focus if the Government is serious about delivering its social mobility agenda. Experience shows that it cannot rely on the sector alone to deliver.
We spoke to the Office for Students at its inception and hope that it will set a clear marker that it really is acting in the interests of students from day one. It is still unclear how it will gauge the real concerns of students and ensure that institutions are delivering and sanctioned when they let students down.
It will be important to get right the change in the ease with which students are able to transfer institutions. This will not only be critical to the life chances of tens of thousands of young people but also to creating the foundations for the UK to face the many challenges ahead.
Comment from Committee Chair, Meg Hillier MP:
"The choices prospective students make about higher education can be the most critical they have ever faced.
Their decisions can have a transformative impact on their life prospects and, in turn, lay the foundations for significant benefits to the wider economy.
It is therefore deeply concerning that the evidence indicates Government’s approach to the higher education sector is letting those same students down.
The advice available to help students, in the overwhelming majority of cases teenagers, make informed choices is inadequate.
Should students then be unhappy with the course they choose, they are not sufficiently empowered to switch providers or get their money back.
At the same time, Government can provide no evidence that competition between institutions will drive up the quality of education they provide.
These are not indicators of a market working in students’ best interests. Rather, they are the symptoms of failure.
If Government is to deliver the promised benefits of its reforms then it must be far more rigorous in measuring progress against its objectives and where necessary move swiftly to take remedial action.
Much rides on the ability of the new Office for Students to function as an effective regulator and as a priority we expect it to set out in detail exactly how it will approach the task of safeguarding students’ interests."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Chair calls for permanent, long-term solution to bring clarity to sector and passenger22/09/2020 15:33:00
The Government has announced that rail franchising has been replaced with new Emergency Recovery Measures Agreements (ERMAs).
Home Office “has no idea” of the impact of immigration policies21/09/2020 15:33:00
Department instead appearing to formulate policy on “anecdote, assumption and prejudice”; and shows far too little concern over damage caused by its failures on both the illegal and legitimate migrant populations.
Agrifood and the Northern Ireland Protocol Government response18/09/2020 15:33:00
The EU Environment Sub-Committee writes again to Secretary of State George Eustice regarding implementation issues for Northern Ireland agrifood under the Protocol.
Committee on Standards publishes report on the conduct of David Morris MP18/09/2020 11:38:00
The Committee is grateful to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards for her inquiry, which was undertaken following a complaint that Mr Morris had breached the paid advocacy rule when he asked a Topical Question and sent a follow up email to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Committee reports on Brexit financial settlement, 2021 fishing quotas, and EU energy strategy17/09/2020 15:33:00
In its latest report, the European Scrutiny Committee considers recent draft EU legislation and policy documents deposited in Parliament by the Government.
PAC condemns “badly missed” target to make thousands of Grenfell-style cladding homes safe17/09/2020 11:43:00
Three years after the Grenfell Tower disaster in which 72 people lost their lives, only a third (155 out of 455) of high-rise buildings with Grenfell-style flammable cladding due to be fixed by now have had their cladding replaced with a safe alternative.
Committee launches new inquiry on Xinjiang Detention Camps17/09/2020 09:33:00
The Foreign Affairs Committee yesterday launched an inquiry into the Xinjiang detention camps.
MPs to present concerns to Ministers on support for households during COVID-1916/09/2020 15:33:00
On Thursday 17 September, the Petitions Committee will hold a hybrid e-petitions session to put concerns to Ministers on support for households during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chair comment's on yesterday’s publication of BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2019/2016/09/2020 12:33:00
DCMS Committee Chair Julian Knight MP yesterday commented on the publication of BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20
Insurance ruling provides “hope” for businesses disrupted by coronavirus16/09/2020 10:33:00
On 1 May 2020 the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that it intended ‘to seek legal clarity on business interruption insurance to resolve doubt for businesses who are facing uncertainty on their claims.’