IEA - Brexit offers unrivalled opportunity to halt potential food price rises, argues new paper
IEA releases new paper on farming policy
Brexit means the UK can avoid costly agricultural regulations which would likely cause food prices to shoot up.
A new paper from the Institute of Economic Affairs demonstrates the extent to which pressure groups have been able to lobby the EU to increase regulation in the areas of food standards, animal welfare and the environment which have created deadweight costs and which are misaligned with consumer preferences.
The paper charts the increase in compliance costs within existing Common Agricultural Policy regulations and then demonstrates that, in the worst case scenario, the potential costs of further environmental restrictions would have added costs of up to £7.5 billion had the UK remained within the EU.
Common Agricultural Policy:
- The CAP is not only the EU’s most expensive policy, but also its most complex and interventionist. Its remit covers a multitude of areas, from biodiversity to food safety to environmental protection, all of which have led to a huge regulatory burden on the food industry.
- Since the 1990s, the growth of regulation and subsidies has gone hand-in-hand as subsidies have been increasingly tied to environmental requirements imposed on farmers. This leads to costs for consumers and taxpayers alike
- One cause of the growth in regulation is the use of the precautionary principle. This is poorly defined. However, in general, it applications means that the benefit of the doubt is given to the protection against any possible harm at the expense of consumer, business or economic interests. The result has been a drift towards overregulation and a jettisoning of rational principles of managing and taking into account risk.
- As relatively few people have direct experience of farming, professional, well-resourced non-farming interest groups have been successful in campaigning against things such as genetically modified crops (GMOs).
The threat from increased regulation
- Official figures shows that compliance with existing agricultural regulations is costing nearly £600 million every year in England alone. Even worse, these figures fail to take into account the longer-term costs arising from the impact the regulations have on competitiveness and food affordability, meaning the real cost is much higher.
- The concern is not only the long-term opportunity costs of regulations, but also the danger that the use of the precautionary principle has unnecessarily widened the burden and long-term deadweight costs of regulation.
- The current EU review process could result in the removal from sale of many more pesticides commonly used in the UK, leading to significant yield losses and reductions in economic margins.
- Without the use of crop protection products such as pesticides, overall yields would fall by a half.
If all food were grown organically:
- Wheat yields would halve, leading to a price rise of nearly 70%
- Potato yields would fall by 44% leading to a price increase of nearly 200%
- Bean yields would fall by a quarter, leading to a price rise of over 50%
Commenting on the report, Mark Littlewood, Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“EU member states face staggering food price rises unless the march of increased regulation is halted. The UK is fortunate that it now has the opportunity to repatriate control of its farming regulations. It’s crucial that decisions stem from good scientific evidence, and pay attention to consumers’ interests and the potential crippling costs that overregulation can have in pushing up food prices and the cost of living.”
Notes to Editors:
For media enquiries, please contact Stephanie Lis, Director of Communications Director on 020 7799 8909 or 07766 221 268.
To read the full paper, Ploughing the Wrong Furrow – the costs of agricultural exceptionalism and the precautionary principle, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
IFS - Higher education enables graduates to move to places with better career prospects – but this leads to brain drain from the North and coastal areas17/09/2021 11:20:00
By age 27, graduates are 10 percentage points more likely to have moved away from the area where they grew up than otherwise similar non-graduates. Graduates who move tend to move to London and other affluent cities and experience large gains in earnings. This suggests that higher education enables people to move to areas that offer better labour market opportunities.
JRF - New Cabinet faces living standards crisis if they go ahead with cut to Universal Credit16/09/2021 15:20:00
JRF responds to House of Commons debate on the planned cut to Universal Credit and Working Tax Credit.
Civitas - Two Tests for UK Trade: Does seamless, tariff-free trade boost exports and does distance matter?16/09/2021 14:20:00
During the UK’s departure from the European Union, debate about UK trade policy was dominated by two assertions:
Inflation could reach 5 per cent by Christmas, says IEA Expert15/09/2021 16:10:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to ONS consumer price inflation figures for August 2021
IEA - Think tank helped ensure UK-EU FTA “against the odds”15/09/2021 14:15:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has reached the final of this year’s Templeton Freedom Award, which celebrates organisations that have made a meaningful impact on the proliferation of free market ideas through education, policy research or media outreach.
JRF - New research highlights ‘shameful’ racial disparities in housing system15/09/2021 09:10:00
Welfare and immigration policies are contributing to sharply unequal access to affordable housing among BAME communities. A new report from the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) analyses the impact of these policies.
IEA - UK ranks 12th amongst 165 jurisdictions in economic freedom14/09/2021 15:20:00
The UK ranks 12th out of 165 countries and territories included in the Economic Freedom of the World: 2021 Annual Report, released today by the Institute of Economic Affairs in conjunction with Canada’s Fraser Institute. Last year, the UK ranked 13th.
Adam Smith Inst - 2.1 Million Vulnerable Unvaccinated14/09/2021 10:05:00
Raft of measures proposed to protect human life and liberty as Covid-19 becomes endemic
Adam Smith Inst - NEW POLL: Brits back freer movement with New Zealand14/09/2021 09:05:00
A new poll from the Adam Smith Institute and C|T Group RSR confirms that Brits are eager to strike a trade deal with New Zealand which includes freer movement and mutual recognition of qualifications.
IFS - NHS funding boost should be enough to meet pressures over the next two years, but not in the medium term13/09/2021 14:20:00
Last Tuesday the Prime Minister announced a new funding settlement for health and social care in England. This included an additional £6.6 billion for NHS England in 2022−23 and £3.6 billion in 2023−24, on top of pre-pandemic plans, in the face of ongoing pressures from the COVID-19 pandemic.