IEA - Chancellor “can only do so much” to get the economy moving
IEA responds to the Chancellor's summer economic update
Commenting on the Chancellor’s Summer Economic Update, Professor Syed Kamall, Academic and Research Director at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“We are in an unprecedented situation and there remains the issue that many individuals and families are fearful of leaving their homes to resume every day activities. The Chancellor can only do so much in terms of measures introduced to get the economy moving.
“The cut to Stamp Duty is welcome but why isn’t it permanent? It is a destructive, regressive tax that clogs up the housing market and limits labour mobility. Making it permanent would get the property market moving and encourage those who want to downsize as well as those looking for family houses, freeing up homes for first-time buyers.
“It is disappointing more was not announced to encourage private investment in infrastructure – such as reopening old railways or rezoning to allow homes to be built in places being vacated by shops, such as high streets.”
Commenting on the government’s plan for jobs, Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“The Chancellor has likely found a politically popular policy by offering subsidies for those employing under 25s but we should not expect too much real benefit.
“Recruitment subsidies have many drawbacks. Workers are taken on who would have found work anyway, with the taxpayer subsidy simply boosting the employers’ profits. The target group, in this case the young unemployed, are taken on at the expense of another group—say, older workers, women returners, or the only slightly less young, who become unemployed instead. The schemes also benefit large companies able to take on more subsidised workers over small and medium sized enterprises who do not benefit as much and therefore lose out in a competitive environment and have to shed labour or close their business.
“The real challenge is to deregulate the labour and product markets on a sustainable basis to encourage job creation over the longer term, rather than short-term sticking-plaster schemes of this kind.”
Commenting on the Stamp Duty holiday and hospitality VAT cut, Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Most economists agree that Stamp Duty on housing is one of the worst taxes and any easing of the burden is welcome. But the Chancellor should go further and extend this into a fundamental review of all taxes on property, with the aim of simplifying the system and allowing local authorities to keep a higher proportion of revenues raised in their area.”
“The Chancellor was right to resist calls for what would only have been a small across-the-board cut in VAT and instead target a larger reduction on the leisure and hospitality sector, where the additional support is most needed. But the ‘Eat Out to Help Out’ scheme may be a gimmick too far. It is at least market-led, in that consumers themselves will decide which businesses should benefit. However, it seems an overly complicated way to deliver a boost to demand lasting just a few days in August.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries, please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager, 07715 942731
IEA spokespeople are available for interview and further comment.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
Policy Exchange - Call for evidence: Building hospitals in the post-Covid era04/08/2020 12:35:00
In the context of the government’s plans to build 40 new hospitals, Policy Exchange is launching a call for evidence to inform a major piece of research into how we should build the next generation of hospitals.
Demos - British public support ban on targeted political ads online04/08/2020 11:35:00
New research has found that calls for greater regulation in political campaigns have a far greater consensus of support among the general public than arguments against regulation.
IFG - Public services were not fit to respond to the coronavirus crisis04/08/2020 10:35:00
Failures in planning and funding cuts meant public services were not well prepared to handle the coronavirus crisis, says a new report from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy.
IFS - Geographical inequality in incomes has been falling, but wealth inequalities are rising04/08/2020 09:35:00
The government pledges to ‘level up’ the country and, more recently, the unequal impacts of the COVID-19 crisis have led to an increased focus on inequalities between places as well as between people.
IEA - Furlough scheme changes reflect need to get “back to reality”31/07/2020 16:20:00
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, commented on changes to the furlough scheme effective tomorrow and calls to extend the scheme
UK banks in “fragile state” as Covid crisis beckons, says new IEA research31/07/2020 15:20:00
The Bank of England’s stewardship of the banking system has “turned out to be a disaster, again” say Kevin Dowd and Dean Buckner
IFS - Young people increasingly concentrated in low-paid occupations, and young men increasingly struggling to progress – even before COVID-1931/07/2020 14:20:00
Recent generations have increasingly been starting their careers in low-paid occupations such as bar staff, waiters, call centre workers and kitchen assistants, despite higher education levels.
‘Another interim stop-gap’: The King’s Fund response to NHS People Plan 20/2130/07/2020 11:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on the expected NHS People Plan and related government announcements