IEA - Employment tribunal fees effective in saving unnecessary costs
Reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling on employment tribunal fees
“The Supreme Court’s decision to rule Employment Tribunal fees unlawful is surprising; the government should think carefully how to respond. We do not want to go back to the situation where in excess of 200,000 claims were being made a year. By common consent many of these claims were weak and in some cases frivolous, but they were costly and time-consuming for employers to defend.
“If devising an acceptable fee system proves too difficult, we need to ensure that procedures are tightened to ensure all but the most serious cases are resolved through reconciliation at an early stage, and that where cases must come to tribunals they are dealt with expeditiously.
“More generally, the government should undertake a fundamental review of employment regulation to make it simpler and clearer, with fewer obstacles to job creation. Particularly with Brexit on the horizon, we must ensure that this does not lead to more unnecessary and harmful employment regulations. Unfortunately the drift for many years has been in the opposite direction.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Nerissa Chesterfield, Communications Officer: firstname.lastname@example.org 020 7799 8920 or 07791 390 268
In June 2017 the IEA published ‘Working to Rule: The Damaging Economics of UK Employment Regulation’. To download this report please click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
The King's Fund response to NHS Improvement's quarterly performance report22/02/2018 12:35:00
Richard Murray, Director of Policy for The King’s Fund, said: ‘It is alarming that NHS providers now forecast a £931 million deficit for this financial year, a deterioration of more than £300 million in three months. This reflects the dramatic decline in the finances of a number of individual trusts, and raises serious questions about how reasonable the financial targets were in the first place.
Adam Smith Inst - Mutually Assured Prosperity22/02/2018 11:35:00
Matt Kilcoyne, Head of Communications at the ASI, commented on David Davis' recent speech where he called on European Union partners and member states to agree mutual recognition on the basis of trust the Adam Smith Institute says that the government's Brexit secretary is speaking sense.
IFS analysis of yesterday’s public finance figures22/02/2018 10:35:00
Yesterday, the Office for National Statistics and HM Treasury published Public Sector Finances January 2018. We now have details of central government receipts, central government spending, public sector net investment, borrowing and debt for the first ten months of financial year 2017−18.
IPPR Scotland: Ending the Benefit Cap and ‘Rape Clause’ in Scotland could lift 15,000 out of poverty22/02/2018 09:35:00
IPPR Scotland has analysed the impact of current proposed income tax cuts on the lowest earners in Scotland.
JRF - Nearly one in three adults out of work as Northern Ireland makes no progress on poverty in a decade20/02/2018 13:35:00
Almost one in three working-age adults in Northern Ireland are out of work, as a new report shows how Northern Ireland’s employment rate is lagging behind the rest of Great Britain.