IEA - Employment tribunal fees effective in saving unnecessary costs
Reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling on employment tribunal fees
“The Supreme Court’s decision to rule Employment Tribunal fees unlawful is surprising; the government should think carefully how to respond. We do not want to go back to the situation where in excess of 200,000 claims were being made a year. By common consent many of these claims were weak and in some cases frivolous, but they were costly and time-consuming for employers to defend.
“If devising an acceptable fee system proves too difficult, we need to ensure that procedures are tightened to ensure all but the most serious cases are resolved through reconciliation at an early stage, and that where cases must come to tribunals they are dealt with expeditiously.
“More generally, the government should undertake a fundamental review of employment regulation to make it simpler and clearer, with fewer obstacles to job creation. Particularly with Brexit on the horizon, we must ensure that this does not lead to more unnecessary and harmful employment regulations. Unfortunately the drift for many years has been in the opposite direction.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Nerissa Chesterfield, Communications Officer: email@example.com 020 7799 8920 or 07791 390 268
In June 2017 the IEA published ‘Working to Rule: The Damaging Economics of UK Employment Regulation’. To download this report please click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - We'll pay an absolutely extortionate bill for energy caps12/10/2017 12:35:00
With the government pressing ahead with a Bill to create an absolute cap on energy prices, the Adam Smith Institute laments the decision by the government to intervene in the energy market.
Policy Exchange - Spielman is right to move Ofsted’s focus onto curriculum – but can the school system step up?12/10/2017 11:35:00
“There is a serious risk of schools not fulfilling the promise and potential of the 2014 national curriculum or of academies not using their freedoms to achieve the same.” So warns Ofsted’s chief inspector of schools today in a bold intervention on the role of curriculum – and the importance of teachers thinking about curriculum – in our children’s schools.
King's Fund - Number of NHS nurses and health visitors falls for first time since 201312/10/2017 10:35:00
The number of nurses and health visitors employed by the NHS has fallen for the first time on a year-on-year basis since April 2013, according to a new analysis by The King’s Fund.
Policy Exchange - Welcome for government’s ethnic outcome audit — but a warning too12/10/2017 09:35:00
We welcome the government’s interest in keeping a close watch on ethnic outcomes in the UK—it is what we have been doing for the past three years at the Integration Hub, now based at Policy Exchange. But it is important that their new initiative, the Race Disparity Audit, pinpoints real and not imaginary problems and does not fuel division based on selective analysis of statistics.