IEA - Government should scrap apprenticeship levy, focus on improving education
Len Shackleton responds to Public Accounts Committee report
Commenting on a Public Accounts Committee report, which finds that apprenticeship reforms are failing to deliver, the IEA’s Editorial and Research Fellow Prof Len Shackleton said:
“The failure of the government’s policy on apprenticeships, like so many other schemes in the past, is no surprise; it was widely predicted. The levy has turned out to be a crude payroll tax. Businesses – which have no obvious need for or means of generating apprenticeships – are simply subsidising others. Even those who want to develop apprenticeships have found the inevitable bureaucracy debilitating and disincentivising.
“The essentially mediaeval concept of an apprenticeship made sense in a world where career paths were clear and industries lasted for generations. It is much more suited to manufacturing and to craft skills, which is why it continues to be of some significance in countries like Germany. The skills needed in Britain, with its focus on innovative services and high-tech start-ups, cannot in the main be taught by time-served graduates of apprenticeship systems.
“The levy should be scrapped. In areas where genuine apprenticeships – rather than schemes cobbled together to attract government funding – still make sense, the focus should be on potential apprentices rather than businesses. A form of loan system could enable young people to access high-quality training schemes which employers voluntarily provide.
“Government efforts should be confined to improving the quality of general education in schools – which would do more to boost future employment prospects and productivity than yet more attempts to recreate a mass apprenticeship culture.”
View report: The apprenticeships programme: progress review
Latest News from
IFG - Government underspending puts investment plans at risk25/02/2020 09:35:00
As Rishi Sunak prepares the Johnson government’s first budget, a new Institute for Government report finds that departments may struggle to spend the money they are allocated as part of Johnson’s ambitious infrastructure investment plans.
The King's Fund responds to the results of the NHS Staff Survey 201920/02/2020 13:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund commented on the NHS Staff Survey 2019 results
IEA responds to Government’s post-Brexit immigration proposals20/02/2020 12:35:00
The IEA’s Head of Political Economy Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to the Government’s announcement for a new points-based immigration system post-Brexit
ASI comments on new immigration system proposals20/02/2020 11:35:00
Daniel Pryor, Head of Programmes at the Adam Smith Institute, responded to the Government’s new plans for a post-Brexit immigration system
IPPR - Immigration plans analysis: Two thirds of current EU migrants in health and care sector would have been found ineligible20/02/2020 10:35:00
Key sectors would face labour and skills shortages in shock to labour market from new government immigration plans – IPPR analysis
Adam Smith Institute - Abolish the Factory Tax to level up Britain20/02/2020 09:35:00
A new paper from the neoliberal think tank the Adam Smith Institute says that if the Prime Minister is serious about boosting wages and levelling up; then he needs to Abolish the Factory Tax.
NIESR Monthly Wage Tracker: Slight Rebound Expected for Earnings Growth19/02/2020 13:15:00
Slight Rebound Expected for Earnings Growth
NIESR: Global growth to remain at 10-year low in 202013/02/2020 13:10:00
NIESR Press Release: Global growth to remain at 10-year low in 2020