IEA - Putting railways under the control of Network Rail would be “ill-advised,” says Professor Len Shackleton
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, responded to the news that the government will “renationalise” Britain’s railways using emergency coronavirus measures
“The announcement of the intention to renationalise the railways, ahead of the long-awaited Williams Report, is ill-advised. Putting them under the control of Network Rail, whose record in its existing role (maintaining infrastructure) has been very poor, is a misuse of Coronavirus powers and should be properly debated by Parliament.
“The Transport Secretary Grant Shapps is proposing a board, which he will chair, to oversee the railways. Even in the early days of British Railways it was understood that a nationalised industry should not be run directly by politicians, subject to inevitable day-to-day political pressures.
“The railways, already in difficulties, face enormous problems with the collapse of their market during lockdown, and the imposition of social distancing rules which drastically reduce train capacities.
“It is understandable why temporary arrangements to override franchises have been taken. But the new set-up proposed is no way to run a railway in the longer term. It would eliminate competition and innovation, reduce investment (which would now depend solely on the Treasury, which has other priorities), and hand massively enhanced disruptive power to the rail unions.”
For media enquiries, contact Annabel Denham, 07540770774
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, is available for further comment.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
NLGN - New Research: Mutual Aid groups have been "indispensable" in Covid response14/07/2020 13:35:00
Mutual Aid groups have been an indispensable part of the country’s response to COVID-19, powered by people on furlough.
IFS - Brexit offers an opportunity to rationalise regional funding schemes. It’s past time government announced what it will do14/07/2020 12:35:00
With less than six months until the UK leaves European regional development funding schemes, the UK government has yet to confirm details of its proposed replacement: the Shared Prosperity Fund.
North of England receives less than half the life science investment made in South, reveals IPPR14/07/2020 11:35:00
Think tank calls for life science investment to be prioritised to ‘level-up’ the country and prepare for future global pandemics
Civitas - Did UK pandemic policy unleash a culture of medical dependence, unrest and insecurity?14/07/2020 10:35:00
The coronavirus pandemic has frequently been viewed in modern Britain as either unique, exceptional or unprecedented. In this report, David Martin Jones and Emma Webb suggest there is nothing particularly novel about disease in the human experience – and cautions that we are desperately in need of some historical perspective.
Thousands of EU migrants could be barred from government support in Covid economic crisis, warns IPPR14/07/2020 09:35:00
Think tank calls for ‘flawed’ Habitual Residence Test to be suspended to ensure EU migrants’ access to a social safety net
JRF response to the Summer Economic Update09/07/2020 12:35:00
Helen Barnard, Acting Director of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, responded to the Chancellor's statement
IPPR reacts to the Chancellor’s mini budget09/07/2020 11:35:00
Progressive think tank warns that this is ‘more of a cut price deal than a new deal’
IEA - Chancellor “can only do so much” to get the economy moving09/07/2020 10:35:00
IEA responds to the Chancellor's summer economic update