IEA - Scrap trade agreements to boost free trade
Unilateral free trade is both achievable and preferable to the status quo. Policymakers often wrongly claim that trade agreements are necessary to enable the UK to prosper in world markets. In a new report released by the Institute of Economic Affairs, Professor Patrick Minford contends that trade agreements can be detrimental as they involve significant trade diversion. Unilateral free trade is in fact more beneficial.
The UK produces traded goods in a competitive world market, where prices for these goods are set by world supply and demand. Given the UK has around 3 per cent of world GDP, it is a relatively ‘small’ supplier, making us a price-taker with no effect on world price. Thus we have no national interest in trade agreements with any particular country that are forged by the EU, and this why unilateral free trade would best suit the UK.
The case for unilateral free trade:
- Unilateral free trade is possible: for example, China’s rapid growth owes little to trade agreements as it was not a member of the WTO until 2001.
- 43 per cent of UK trade is in services where the European Union has essentially no commercial policy and around 50 per cent of our goods trade is outside the EU. All this services trade and non-EU trade is conducted under WTO rules which implies that over 70 per cent of UK trade is already conducted under general WTO rules without any involvement of the EU. On the whole, UK services trade has bypassed the EU because the long-standing national barriers have not been removed.
- The UK is a supplier of many financial and other services to many different countries. If any country decides to stop trading with the UK there are others with whom the UK can do business and so far the UK has managed to do good service business around the world without any help from the EU in forging specific trade agreements.
- Assuming that UK products are produced within competitive UK industries and that the output of any UK product is small relative to the size of the world market for that product, gives rise to the trade theory: ‘the importance of being unimportant’.
- This suggests that any small country levying a tariff on UK products cannot influence their world price – neither the world supply nor demand for the product changes, thus the world price does not change.
- Tariffs in one country will merely prompt UK businesses to sell products elsewhere. Plus given that the UK share of world trade is small, no country has an incentive to levy tariffs on the UK.
- For particular firms a given market may be crucial if it sells a high proportion of its output to that market. This explains why many firms lobby intensely for trade agreements in their own markets. But corporate interests should not be confused with the national interest.
Commenting on the report Ryan Bourne, Head of Public Policy at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Many people think that to reap the benefits of growing international trade there needs to be an expansion in trade agreements. The reality is they are of limited relevance for a ‘small’ world supplier such as the UK and unilateral free trade is far more preferable to numerous and complicated bilateral and multilateral trade deals.”
Notes to editors:
To arrange an interview about the report contact Nerissa Chesterfield, Communications Officer:firstname.lastname@example.org or 020 7799 8920 or 07791 390268
The full report, ‘No need to queue: The benefits of free trade without trade agreements’ can be downloaded here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
IPPR - Calls for ‘quick win’ changes to social security as claimants say system leaves them ‘scared, exhausted and drained’21/02/2024 15:05:00
A state of the nation report on the UK’s social security system concludes with a package of reforms to cut poverty, incentivise work and deliver quick wins to create a modern welfare system.
IFS - January usually sees the government run an overall surplus, as this is the month when a large chunk of self-assessment receipts is paid21/02/2024 13:10:00
Today’s ONS government borrowing figures suggest that the public sector ran a surplus of £16.7 billion in January. This is much bigger than the £7.5 billion surplus it ran in January 2023, and is the biggest January surplus on record.
King's Fund - An unhealthy end looms for the private finance initiative19/02/2024 09:20:00
The private finance initiative (PFI) was controversial from day one. Ten thousand or so days later it still is, as the first of these 25–30-year contracts for the private sector to finance, design, build and maintain public assets, including hospitals, come to an end.
IEA - Recession shock bolsters case for interest rate and tax cuts16/02/2024 09:05:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the free market think tank, the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on data showing that the UK entered recession in 2023
Lack of progress on growth "a wake-up call", says IPPR15/02/2024 10:25:00
Pranesh Narayanan, research fellow at IPPR responds to today’s GDP figures
IPPR - Revealed: Heart disease is the single largest factor behind people leaving the workforce due to ill health15/02/2024 09:25:00
People are more likely to leave work due to a heart condition than any other health issue, according to a new report from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).
Prices still rising a “reminder of the costs working people have paid” says IPPR14/02/2024 16:20:00
Dr George Dibb, associate director for economic policy at IPPR responds to today’s monthly inflation figures
King's Fund - Call for radical refocusing of health and care system to put primary and community services at its core14/02/2024 15:20:00
The health and care system in England must be radically refocused to put primary and community care at its core if it is to be effective and sustainable, according to a major new report published by The King’s Fund.