IEA - UK has much to gain and little to fear from trade deal with US
IEA Brexit Unit releases report on UK-US trade deal
British opponents of a US-UK trade deal have tended to exaggerate the risks, including fears that it would inevitably lead to the ‘Americanisation’ of the NHS, a free-for-all for powerful multinational corporations, or a race to the bottom in food standards.
A new briefing from the Institute of Economic Affairs explains the benefits of an agreement, arguing that an early deal with the US would help post-Brexit Britain to set out its stall as a global champion of free trade, and help in the harder tasks that lie ahead in gaining deals with emerging economies such as China and India.
The benefits of a US-UK deal:
- The economic and financial links between the two countries are already close. For example, the UK exports more goods to the US than to any other country, and the US and the UK are each other’s largest source of foreign direct investment. The UK should therefore be able to conclude a good trade deal with the US sooner than the EU ever could.
- There are many areas – including aviation, defence and financial services – where trade could be liberalised to the benefits of both sides.
- If US firms are allowed more access to UK public sector contracts, the UK could reasonably expect equivalent access to the much larger US markets in return – meaning waivers from ‘Buy American’ provisions.
- The liberalisation of agricultural trade would result in more choice and lower prices for UK consumers for a wide range of foodstuffs, including many (such as rice and citrus fruits) which UK farmers do not even produce and where animal welfare is simply not an issue.
Fearmongering around a deal is overblown:
- A deal would not lead to ‘Americanisation’ of the NHS. A US-UK trade deal may mean that more of the NHS contracts that are currently awarded to private British or EU companies go, in future, to private US companies instead. But increased competition from a wider pool of potential suppliers should improve quality and drive down costs. Healthcare would remain universally available and free at the point of delivery – unless the UK government decides otherwise.
- Fears around investor-state dispute settlements are overblown. Critics argue ISDS would lead to an undermining of areas such as workers’ rights. But it is not obvious that free trade deals must include an ISDS mechanism, and it is hard to see why a well-designed system should penalise a government that is acting reasonably and within the rules. Moreover, the UK government is already subject to the jurisdiction of international courts – not least the ECJ.
- Food standards need not be undermined. It is wrong to assume that the most restrictive standards are necessarily the best. Rules should be science-based and proportionate, and the EU doesn’t always get the balance right. The UK government has though already made it clear that it will not allow a trade deal with the US to undermine food safety or animal welfare.
Commenting on the briefing, its author Julian Jessop, said:
“Not only would a US-UK trade deal further strengthen one of the UK’s closest relationships, it would help post-Brexit Britain to set out its stall as a global champion of free trade. As long as we escape the constraints of the EU’s customs union and restrictive regulations, the UK will be able to forge a trade deal with the US more quickly than the EU ever could. The opportunities to consumers are huge; it’s time to ignore the naysayers and recognise the path to prosperity Brexit provides.”
Notes to Editors:
For media enquiries please contact Stephanie Lis, Director of Communications: firstname.lastname@example.org or 0207 799 8909 or 07766 221 268
To download the briefing, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
IPPR - Investing in a green recovery could create 1.6 million new jobs after Covid crisis, report finds03/07/2020 16:20:00
Plan for a clean and fair recovery, including drive to insulate homes and fit low-carbon heating, is ‘best way’ to boost economy says IPPR
IFS - Career disruption caused by COVID-19 threatens prolonged cost for young workers03/07/2020 15:20:00
There is growing evidence that the lockdown has had particularly negative impacts on young people’s labour market outcomes. New IFS research, funded by the Turing Institute, shows that the COVID-19 pandemic threatens to severely disrupt the career progression of young workers, suggesting that negative economic impacts on this age group may last well beyond the easing of the lockdown.
IPPR - Youth unemployment set to more than double by end of the year according to think tank03/07/2020 14:20:00
£3 billion government intervention needed to create hundreds of thousands of jobs and support young people, says IPPR
Civitas - ‘Schools should reopen fully’ in September – government must ‘drop all requirements for children to practice social distancing with immediate effect’, says think-tank report02/07/2020 14:35:00
Given the expectation for school reopening plans in England to be unveiled by the government this week, the government should ‘drop all requirements for children to practice social distancing with immediate effect’, urges a new Civitas report.
Adam Smith Inst - Real New Deal is Boris' Promise of Planning Reform02/07/2020 13:35:00
Despite worrying news of an interventionist ‘New Deal’ for the country, the best noises from the Prime Minister Boris Johnson in his speech in Dudley come in the detail of promised planning reform. Much of which builds on suggestions the ASI has made in recent months and years — including the great research work done by London YIMBY’s John Myers.
JRF responds to the Prime Minister’s speech promising a 'New Deal' for Britain02/07/2020 12:35:00
Helen Barnard, Acting Director of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Prime Minister’s speech promising a 'New Deal' for Britain
IPPR North responds to PM’s ‘Build Build Build’ speech02/07/2020 11:35:00
IPPR North Director Sarah Longlands responded to the PM’s ‘Build Build Build’ speech
IEA responds to PM’s plan for the UK’s economic recovery02/07/2020 10:35:00
IEA Senior Academic Fellow Professor Philip Booth responded to the Prime Minister’s plans for the UK’s economic recovery post Covid-19
PM Speech: IPPR reacts to planning and housing plans that ‘fall woefully short’ of what is needed02/07/2020 09:35:00
High Streets put at risk due to plans to reform planning laws, says IPPR
IPPR - Covid housing affordability crisis: three quarters back call for dedicated, affordable housing for key workers30/06/2020 15:35:00
An IPPR report today, together with new polling commissioned by the think tank, warns that housing affordability issues are set to intensify due to Covid-19, with those on low incomes and privately renting most affected.