IEA - Unambitious Liberal Democrat manifesto hamstrung by tax and spending commitments
Reaction to the Liberal Democrat Party's manifesto
Commenting on the Liberal Democrat Party’s manifesto, Mark Littlewood, Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“The Liberal Democrats’ manifesto is full of spending and tax commitments which could well have a perverse effect on the UK economy.
“On the plus side, the sums involved are more realistic than we have seen from other parties so far. The Liberal Democrats would increase current (day-to-day) spending by £30bn, nearly £20bn less than the Labour Party. What’s more, rather than pay for all of this straightaway, the cost would be divided between £16bn of tax rises and £14bn in borrowing. This does at least reduce the immediate hit on the economy from higher taxes and might even provide a small fiscal boost, but only by delaying the pain.
“What’s more, the proposed increases in income and corporation tax are vulnerable to the same criticisms as those made of Labour’s plans. The much smaller increase in corporation tax (to 20% rather than Labour’s 26%) does make it more likely that the expected revenues will be achieved. But far more people will be affected by the 1p increase in income tax.
“Similarly, the planned increase of £100bn in infrastructure spending is much less ambitious than Labour’s £250bn. But there are the same doubts about any government’s ability to invest wisely while burdening future generations with more debt.
“The manifesto also features some poorly targeted policies; the extension of free school meals to all primary school children is an expensive and unnecessary pledge which would needlessly subsidise middle class parents. The Liberal Democrats also misunderstand the key problems facing the NHS. Throwing ever more money at our ailing healthcare system has done little to improve outcomes. It’s time for a fundamental reassessment of how healthcare is provided in the UK, not a tinkering at the edges.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Stephanie Lis, Director of Communications: firstname.lastname@example.org or 020 7799 8909 or 07766 221 268.
Relevent IEA publications
Income tax increases
In 2016 the Institute of Economic Affairs published ‘Taxation, Government Spending and Economic Growth’, which called to abolish twenty taxes to improve and encourage economic growth. To download this please click here.
Corporation tax increases
In 2016 the Institute of Economic Affairs published ‘Why corporation tax should be scrapped’, which calls to bring capital taxation into the 21st century. To download this please click here.
In 2016 the Institute of Economic Affairs published ‘Universal healthcare without the NHS” which recommended emulating best elements of various European healthcare systems, whilst retaining universal healthcare access, to save lives. To download this please click here.
In 2015 the Institute of Economic Affairs published ‘Flaws and Ceilings: Price controls and the damage they cause’, which explains why price controls are so damaging to our economy. To download this please click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
NIESR: A Balanced Budget approach to the Risks posed by Brexit23/11/2017 15:05:00
Dr. Garry Young, Director of Macroeconomic Modelling and Forecasting and Amit Kara, Head of UK Macroeconomic Forecasting have issued the following statement reacting to today’s Budget announcement:
CSJ - The forgotten role of families – why it is time to find our voice on families23/11/2017 13:35:00
New CSJ report sets out the extent of public support for government talking about family stability
Policy Exchange - Beware excessive “declinism” – we’re putting more money into UK defence but American warnings must also be heeded23/11/2017 12:35:00
The 2017 Budget Statement comes amid higher-than-usual fears that the axe is about to return to defence.
IFS - If these forecasts prove correct we will be worse off and government debt will remain higher for longer23/11/2017 11:35:00
The big news in the Budget was not anything the Chancellor did. Instead, it was the new economic forecasts he presented.
The King's Fund responds to the 2017 Autumn Budget23/11/2017 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Director of Policy for The King’s Fund, said: ‘The additional money for the NHS is a welcome shot in the arm as the service struggles to meet rising demand for services. But it is still significantly less than the £4 billion we estimate the NHS needs next year. Even with this additional funding, the NHS will struggle to meet key targets and provide the investment needed in services such as general practice and mental health.