IEA reacts to Government's draft Withdrawal Agreement
The IEA has released a briefing which summarises the key points of the 585-page draft Withdrawal Agreement the Government has put forward.
The briefing makes the case that while the proposed deal would help to minimise some of the disruption that might be caused by the UK’s departure from the EU, it could make it harder to realise the full economic benefits Brexit has to offer.
The controversial aspects of the deal as it stands include: the transition period, the financial settlement and the Irish backstop.
- The transition period anticipated in the Withdrawal Agreement will effectively keep the UK in the Customs Union and the Single Market until the end of 2020, with all ‘four freedoms’ including movement of people, and continued jurisdiction of the ECJ.
- The UK asked for this period, which should provide more than enough time to negotiate and implement a proper Free Trade Agreement. Nonetheless, any ambition to ‘take back control’ would be on hold for at least another two years.
- The UK will be free to ‘negotiate, sign and ratify’ new trade deals during the transition. But the UK will not be able to implement these deals without EU approval, even if other parties were ready to do so.
- The financial settlement honours commitments already made during the UK’s membership, but there is still a case for attaching conditions.
- An offer to pay up to £20bn would at least ensure that the rest of the EU would not be out of pocket during the transition period, and cover the UK contribution to pensions. The remainder could then follow the conclusion of a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
- The biggest sticking point is the Irish backstop. This is only supposed to be a temporary solution if an FTA cannot be ratified in time, but the UK would remain tied to customs union and have to commit to continued regulatory alignment too.
- Most importantly, Northern Ireland would be treated differently from the rest of the UK during this time. Many EU laws would continue to have direct effect there, and there would be new checks on goods moving from the rest of the UK.
- In sum, the proposed deal could make it harder to realise the full economic benefits of Brexit, while threatening the integrity of the UK.
Commenting on the briefing, the IEA’s Chief Economist and Head of the IEA’s Brexit Unit Julian Jessop said:
“With this agreement, the UK may is able to negotiate new trade deals during the transition period in principle. But having the theoretical right to do so is meaningless when trading partners will see the UK is in a de facto customs union in perpetuity. This agreement sets out that the UK will remain bound by the rules of the EU, but with less in determining them, and liable to pay an extortionate financial settlement of around £39 billion.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Nerissa Chesterfield, Head of Communications: email@example.com 020 7799 8920 or 07791 390 268
To download the IEA’s Brexit Unit briefing ‘Dissecting the Deal’ please click here.
For more IEA research on Brexit click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
NIESR Monthly Wage Tracker – Nominal pay growing at fastest rate for a decade, but expected to stabilise in short term20/02/2019 14:25:00
Nominal pay growing at fastest rate for a decade, but expected to stabilise in short term.
Adam Smith Inst - Britain must build up, out and all about19/02/2019 11:35:00
In a new paper for the Adam Smith Institute, Senior Fellow Nigel Hawkins sets out eight ways that Britain could increase the level of housebuilding at a national and local level.
JRF - People in poverty must not pay the price for Brexit19/02/2019 10:35:00
Coalition demand Government action to protect struggling families.
IFS - The government’s proposals for the reform of business rates retention need further work19/02/2019 09:35:00
Ahead of a proposed move from 50% to 75% business rates retention in April 2020, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government is seeking views on its proposals for the reform of certain elements of the business rates retention system in England. IFS researchers Neil Amin-Smith and David Phillips have submitted evidence.
NIESR reacts to the latest ONS CPI inflation statistics released14/02/2019 13:25:00
According to figures released this morning by the ONS, consumer price index inflation fell by 0.3 percentage points to 1.8 per cent in the year to January 2019.
The King's Fund responds to the Topol review14/02/2019 09:35:00
Harry Evans, researcher at The King’s Fund, commented on the Topol review into technology and the health care workforce
IFS - If the coming spending review is to end austerity Chancellor will need to find extra billions12/02/2019 10:35:00
Philip Hammond is yet to confirm how much money will be made available to be allocated among departments at his forthcoming Spending Review. This decision, which may well be announced in the Spring Statement on 13 March, could be one of the most important non-Brexit policy decisions to be made in the current Parliament.
IEA - Ever-expanding Green Belt must be tackled to solve UK housing crisis, says new report12/02/2019 09:35:00
A IEA new report on the UK's housing crisis