IEA reacts to Government's draft Withdrawal Agreement
The IEA has released a briefing which summarises the key points of the 585-page draft Withdrawal Agreement the Government has put forward.
The briefing makes the case that while the proposed deal would help to minimise some of the disruption that might be caused by the UK’s departure from the EU, it could make it harder to realise the full economic benefits Brexit has to offer.
The controversial aspects of the deal as it stands include: the transition period, the financial settlement and the Irish backstop.
- The transition period anticipated in the Withdrawal Agreement will effectively keep the UK in the Customs Union and the Single Market until the end of 2020, with all ‘four freedoms’ including movement of people, and continued jurisdiction of the ECJ.
- The UK asked for this period, which should provide more than enough time to negotiate and implement a proper Free Trade Agreement. Nonetheless, any ambition to ‘take back control’ would be on hold for at least another two years.
- The UK will be free to ‘negotiate, sign and ratify’ new trade deals during the transition. But the UK will not be able to implement these deals without EU approval, even if other parties were ready to do so.
- The financial settlement honours commitments already made during the UK’s membership, but there is still a case for attaching conditions.
- An offer to pay up to £20bn would at least ensure that the rest of the EU would not be out of pocket during the transition period, and cover the UK contribution to pensions. The remainder could then follow the conclusion of a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
- The biggest sticking point is the Irish backstop. This is only supposed to be a temporary solution if an FTA cannot be ratified in time, but the UK would remain tied to customs union and have to commit to continued regulatory alignment too.
- Most importantly, Northern Ireland would be treated differently from the rest of the UK during this time. Many EU laws would continue to have direct effect there, and there would be new checks on goods moving from the rest of the UK.
- In sum, the proposed deal could make it harder to realise the full economic benefits of Brexit, while threatening the integrity of the UK.
Commenting on the briefing, the IEA’s Chief Economist and Head of the IEA’s Brexit Unit Julian Jessop said:
“With this agreement, the UK may is able to negotiate new trade deals during the transition period in principle. But having the theoretical right to do so is meaningless when trading partners will see the UK is in a de facto customs union in perpetuity. This agreement sets out that the UK will remain bound by the rules of the EU, but with less in determining them, and liable to pay an extortionate financial settlement of around £39 billion.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Nerissa Chesterfield, Head of Communications: email@example.com 020 7799 8920 or 07791 390 268
To download the IEA’s Brexit Unit briefing ‘Dissecting the Deal’ please click here.
For more IEA research on Brexit click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems and seeks to provide analysis in order to improve the public understanding of economics.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - Privatize the air!25/06/2019 12:35:00
A new paper from the free market, neoliberal think tank the Adam Smith Institute explains how we can boost competition in the aviation industry and why Boris and Hunt must commit to competition when expanding Heathrow.
IFS - Those in their 60s are earning more than ever, a trend that’s likely to continue25/06/2019 11:35:00
Middle-income 60 to 74 year olds have total incomes more than 60% higher than the similar group in the mid-1990s, with earned income rising by 160% for this group as a whole. Employment rates for older men and women are likely to continue rising as life expectancy increases and subsequent generations have less generous pensions to rely on.
IPPR - Vital Northern Powerhouse agenda held back by Westminster’s austerity25/06/2019 10:35:00
5 years on from the launch of the Northern Powerhouse, IPPR North calls for investment and devolution to power up the North
Adam Smith Inst - Internet red tape strangles free speech & the economy25/06/2019 09:35:00
A new paper by the Adam Smith Institute claims proposed online regulation is a serious threat to freedom of speech and entrepreneurship and argues for a sea change in the Government’s approach to technology post-Brexit:
IPPR North: 1 in 4 North East Public Sector Jobs Lost Since Austerity Began20/06/2019 11:35:00
Stark figures released yesterday show that the North East has seen the biggest percentage cut to public sector workers of all of England’s regions.
NIESR reacts to the latest ONS CPI inflation statistics20/06/2019 11:33:00
According to figures released yesterday by the ONS, consumer price index inflation decreased by 0.1 percentage points to 2.0 per cent in the year to May 2019.
IFS - Big increases in in-work relative poverty rate are about much more than just low pay20/06/2019 10:35:00
Big increases in in-work relative poverty rate are about much more than just low pay
Employ migrants in jobs that match their qualifications to boost economy by £7bn, says IPPR20/06/2019 09:35:00
Investing in integration would boost productivity by using the untapped skills of migrant workers