IEA responds to British Medical Journal report
IEA responds to report from the British Medical Journal about the IEA's work on public health
The BMJ’s report does not seem to have unearthed any new information. The funding information they claim to ‘reveal’ has been in the public domain for years.
Their report seems to centrally rely on a document from 1999, which predates our Director General and all IEA senior staff by more than a decade.
The report also implies that the IEA funds – directly and indirectly – Members of Parliament. The IEA talks to MPs across the political spectrum, as do all other think tanks. This isn’t a “funding link”. The IEA does not give money to any political efforts, and we consider these suggestions to be slanderous.
The BMJ’s insinuation is that we only purport a free market analyses because we are paid to. This is categorically untrue. If the BMJ, or any other outlet, really believe that IEA authors and spokespeople are socialist, tax-loving, big-state advocates at heart, who only advocate free-market economics for a pay cheque, then they are badly mistaken, and again, we consider such accusations to be slanderous.
Lifestyle economics is a legitimate area for public policy debate. These are not matters of medical science. The BMJ argues for a greater role for the state, higher taxes and regulations to address public health issues. They are entitled to do so. But they do not have a monopoly on public policy wisdom. In a free society, it is right and appropriate that they are challenged on their research, political positions, and their effectiveness.
The IEA’s full response to the BMJ’s request for comment prior to publication:
“The IEA is a free-market think tank and it is our mission to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
“We respect the privacy of our donors and don’t place a list of them in the public domain. It is a matter for individual donors whether they wish their donation to be public or private – we leave that to their discretion.
“Funders are not permitted to influence the conclusions of our analysis, neither across a programme, nor within a single publication or communication about it.
“We uphold strict rules to protect our academic independence, including clear guidance to potential donors and a rigorous system of peer review. We are happy, upon request, to supply our protocols for non-interference, which is given to all IEA donors seeking to support the IEA. All donors are required to sign or otherwise acknowledge their acceptance of IEA protocols prior to their support being accepted.
“The IEA does not hold corporate positions on policy. The views of IEA staff, trustees, fellows and council members are their own.
More information about the IEA and its funding can be found here.
Latest News from
NIESR: Boosting digital infrastructure will help close regional gaps05/12/2019 14:20:00
Significant investment in digital infrastructure to increase the coverage of ultrafast and full fibre internet for everyone in the UK may help to reduce regional disparities as the access is unevenly distributed across the country, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
NIESR: Productivity improvement needed to raise living standards05/12/2019 10:20:00
The next government must follow a robust, methodical and wide-ranging approach to kickstart a recovery in productivity growth in order to mend the “slow puncture” in UK economic growth, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
Researchers need to work harder to combat misinformation online, says Demos04/12/2019 14:20:00
A new report from Demos looking into how research and development is discussed and communicated about online shows the need for researchers to work harder to be a bigger part of the online conversation, in order to combat the rise of misinformation.
IEA: Evidence so far suggests minimum pricing in Scotland has been “an expensive flop”04/12/2019 13:15:00
Head of Lifestyle Economics at the Institute of Economic Affairs Christopher Snowdon commented on new evidence from the Office for National Statistics showing that the number of alcohol-related deaths fell in England by 145, fell in Wales by 13 and rose in Scotland by 16
Manifesto Promises: CSJ reports03/12/2019 11:35:00
Election manifestos provide an important reality check for organisations like the Centre for Social Justice. It is a clear indication, in black and white, as to whether government is listening to us and whether we are having an impact.
The King's Fund comments on new GP workforce figures and NHS vacancy data03/12/2019 10:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund commented on new GP workforce figures and NHS vacancy data from NHS Digital
Policy Exchange - Time to plant – and harvest – more trees03/12/2019 09:35:00
All political parties agree that the UK needs more trees, but stimulating markets to support forestry and supporting sustainable wood use also needs to be part of land policy after Brexit, argues a new paper from Policy Exchange’s award-winning Energy and Environment unit.
NIESR: Tough lessons for new government on raising education standards28/11/2019 11:25:00
The incoming government must embark on a wholesale reform of the education from nursery schools through to adult education to help close gaps between the UK and other comparable economies, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
NIESR: Hiking minimum wage too fast may undermine policy’s success27/11/2019 11:20:00
Raising minimum wage levels too quickly risks undermining the strong consensus between employers, workers and political parties that has been built up during the past two decades, especially if the increases lead to falls in employment that are difficult to reverse, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR).