IEA responds to government plans for a UK-US Free Trade Agreement
IEA Director General Mark Littlewood commented on government plans for a UK-US Free Trade Agreement
“Removing barriers to trade with the 93% of the world’s population who don’t live in the European Union is a vital task. A trade deal with the United States may well have considerably greater benefits than are imagined. The government will however need to continually tackle domestic vested interests who will seek to demand protectionism.”
Commenting on the estimated economic benefits of a Free Trade Agreement with the US, IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop said:
“The economic benefits that could arise from a US-UK free trade agreement are hard to quantify, especially over the long-term, but the estimates in this document appear low.
“Experience with previous FTAs shows a US-UK deal could improve UK GDP by far more than the predicted 0.2%.”
Commenting on the provisions for for digital trade, IEA Head of Regulatory Affairs Victoria Hewson said:
“This document contains positive steps forward on data and digital services but the government would be naive to think the US will make concessions in these areas, and on goods and services generally, while we persist with measures like the tech tax and online harms regulation that hit US service providers hardest.
“The proposed approach seeks to keep options open on issues like intellectual property rights and geographic indicators that will be of great interest to the EU, especially in light of what was already agreed on GIs in the Withdrawal Agreement.
“On technical barriers to trade and sanitary and phytosanitary measures the approach could allow both sides’ objectives to be met, but it remains to be seen how the plan will fare when put into action alongside the negotiations with the EU.”
Commenting on plans to protect the National Health Service (NHS), IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop said:
“Politicians are responding to public concerns by ring fencing the NHS, and the government is right to rule out the adoption of the US healthcare model, including on drugs pricing.
“However, the benefits of free trade apply just as much to the provision of goods and services to the NHS as they do to any other sector of the economy. US firms are already major suppliers to the NHS and access could be improved further.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager: 020 7799 8920 or 07715 942731.
For further IEA reading on Brexit and trade, click here.
For further IEA reading on digital services and online harms, click here.
Latest News from
IPPR - Investing in a green recovery could create 1.6 million new jobs after Covid crisis, report finds03/07/2020 16:20:00
Plan for a clean and fair recovery, including drive to insulate homes and fit low-carbon heating, is ‘best way’ to boost economy says IPPR
IFS - Career disruption caused by COVID-19 threatens prolonged cost for young workers03/07/2020 15:20:00
There is growing evidence that the lockdown has had particularly negative impacts on young people’s labour market outcomes. New IFS research, funded by the Turing Institute, shows that the COVID-19 pandemic threatens to severely disrupt the career progression of young workers, suggesting that negative economic impacts on this age group may last well beyond the easing of the lockdown.
IPPR - Youth unemployment set to more than double by end of the year according to think tank03/07/2020 14:20:00
£3 billion government intervention needed to create hundreds of thousands of jobs and support young people, says IPPR
Civitas - ‘Schools should reopen fully’ in September – government must ‘drop all requirements for children to practice social distancing with immediate effect’, says think-tank report02/07/2020 14:35:00
Given the expectation for school reopening plans in England to be unveiled by the government this week, the government should ‘drop all requirements for children to practice social distancing with immediate effect’, urges a new Civitas report.
Adam Smith Inst - Real New Deal is Boris' Promise of Planning Reform02/07/2020 13:35:00
Despite worrying news of an interventionist ‘New Deal’ for the country, the best noises from the Prime Minister Boris Johnson in his speech in Dudley come in the detail of promised planning reform. Much of which builds on suggestions the ASI has made in recent months and years — including the great research work done by London YIMBY’s John Myers.
JRF responds to the Prime Minister’s speech promising a 'New Deal' for Britain02/07/2020 12:35:00
Helen Barnard, Acting Director of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Prime Minister’s speech promising a 'New Deal' for Britain
IPPR North responds to PM’s ‘Build Build Build’ speech02/07/2020 11:35:00
IPPR North Director Sarah Longlands responded to the PM’s ‘Build Build Build’ speech
IEA responds to PM’s plan for the UK’s economic recovery02/07/2020 10:35:00
IEA Senior Academic Fellow Professor Philip Booth responded to the Prime Minister’s plans for the UK’s economic recovery post Covid-19
PM Speech: IPPR reacts to planning and housing plans that ‘fall woefully short’ of what is needed02/07/2020 09:35:00
High Streets put at risk due to plans to reform planning laws, says IPPR
IPPR - Covid housing affordability crisis: three quarters back call for dedicated, affordable housing for key workers30/06/2020 15:35:00
An IPPR report today, together with new polling commissioned by the think tank, warns that housing affordability issues are set to intensify due to Covid-19, with those on low incomes and privately renting most affected.