IEA responds to government plans for a UK-US Free Trade Agreement
IEA Director General Mark Littlewood commented on government plans for a UK-US Free Trade Agreement
“Removing barriers to trade with the 93% of the world’s population who don’t live in the European Union is a vital task. A trade deal with the United States may well have considerably greater benefits than are imagined. The government will however need to continually tackle domestic vested interests who will seek to demand protectionism.”
Commenting on the estimated economic benefits of a Free Trade Agreement with the US, IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop said:
“The economic benefits that could arise from a US-UK free trade agreement are hard to quantify, especially over the long-term, but the estimates in this document appear low.
“Experience with previous FTAs shows a US-UK deal could improve UK GDP by far more than the predicted 0.2%.”
Commenting on the provisions for for digital trade, IEA Head of Regulatory Affairs Victoria Hewson said:
“This document contains positive steps forward on data and digital services but the government would be naive to think the US will make concessions in these areas, and on goods and services generally, while we persist with measures like the tech tax and online harms regulation that hit US service providers hardest.
“The proposed approach seeks to keep options open on issues like intellectual property rights and geographic indicators that will be of great interest to the EU, especially in light of what was already agreed on GIs in the Withdrawal Agreement.
“On technical barriers to trade and sanitary and phytosanitary measures the approach could allow both sides’ objectives to be met, but it remains to be seen how the plan will fare when put into action alongside the negotiations with the EU.”
Commenting on plans to protect the National Health Service (NHS), IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop said:
“Politicians are responding to public concerns by ring fencing the NHS, and the government is right to rule out the adoption of the US healthcare model, including on drugs pricing.
“However, the benefits of free trade apply just as much to the provision of goods and services to the NHS as they do to any other sector of the economy. US firms are already major suppliers to the NHS and access could be improved further.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager: 020 7799 8920 or 07715 942731.
For further IEA reading on Brexit and trade, click here.
For further IEA reading on digital services and online harms, click here.
Latest News from
JRF - Coalition warns it would be a terrible mistake to cut the £20 uplift to Universal Credit01/12/2020 10:35:00
Over 60 organisations and bishops issue a public statement expressing their deep concern at the failure of the Government to announce that they are making the £20 uplift to Universal Credit permanent and extending it to legacy benefits.
Evidence used to justify hospitality closures is “tenuous,” says IEA research01/12/2020 09:35:00
Research from the Institute of Economic Affairs, authored by Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon, casts doubt over the relevance of evidence on which Tier 2 and Tier 3 restrictions on the hospitality sector will be based.
The Spending Review is 'unlikely to be enough to address health and care pressures': The King's Fund responds to the Spending Review26/11/2020 14:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Initial reaction from IFS researchers on Spending Review 2020 and OBR forecasts26/11/2020 13:35:00
IFS Director Paul Johnson says: “Rishi Sunak has been spending truly astonishing amounts of money this year and plans to continue to do so next year in response to Covid.
Spending Review 2020: IPPR response26/11/2020 12:35:00
Spending review misunderstands 'basic economics' and will leave economy needlessly damaged
Rishi cannot tax our way out of debt or spend our way out of a recession — Adam Smith Institute26/11/2020 11:35:00
Following the spending review by the Chancellor, the Adam Smith Institute’s Deputy Director Matt Kilcoyne criticises the public sector spending splurge
Chancellor’s words ring hollow as less is spent on levelling up - JRF26/11/2020 10:35:00
Helen Barnard, Director of the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
IEA - The Chancellor’s diagnosis was correct but “the medicine is inadequate”26/11/2020 09:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review