IEA responds to the Prime Minister’s plan for a green industrial revolution
Mark Littlewood, Director General of the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the government’s 10-point plan for a green industrial revolution
“The government’s plan for a green industrial revolution is ambitious but relies on the false assumption that the state is best placed to pick winners when it comes to technology and the future of energy.
“The measures announced largely rely on heavy-handed prohibitions – such as the ban on sales of petrol and diesel cars – rather than price incentives.
“The motor industry has demonstrated that markets are far better at improving environmental outcomes than government mandates: in response to price signals and customer demand, the engine technologies of today are far less polluting and far more efficient than those of yesteryear.
“Where governments have intervened, they have often got it wrong, the diesel scandal being the most notable example.
“It is hard to think of a more inefficient and less liberal approach to reducing carbon emissions.
“The government would do well to adopt technology-neutral policies, rather than becoming spellbound by grand schemes with very low probabilities of success, such as HS2 and Hinkley Point.”
Responding to the government’s plan to bring forward the ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars from 2035 to 2030, Mark Littlewood, Director General of the free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“The decision to bring forward once again the ban on sales of new petrol and diesel vehicles is yet another regressive, anti-motorist policy.
“The ban is not only authoritarian but is likely to impose huge costs on drivers: electric vehicles still only account for 7% of new car sales in the UK, and are likely to remain far more expensive than their petrol and diesel counterparts.
“The cost of rolling out extensive charging infrastructure across the country, including in rural areas, will be immense – the price of which will be borne by the already over-stretched taxpayer.”
Responding to the Prime Minister’s pledge to introduce hundreds of miles of new cycles lanes, Andy Mayer, Chief Operating Officer at free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“Well-designed cycle schemes can be brilliant, but they cater for a very small minority of commuters.
“Many recent schemes have been poorly designed and introduced without proper scrutiny during the pandemic.
“It is vitally important that policy makers and planners consult the public, prioritise value for money and consider the unintended consequences, like gridlock that increases air pollution.
“These changes should be made cautiously, not ideologically; Westminster politicians would do well to remember that most parts of Britain are not London, and that most commuters still need to drive to work.”
Notes to editors
For media enquiries, please contact Emily Carver, Head of Media, on 07715942731 or email@example.com.
Mark Littlewood is available for interview and further comment.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
CSJ - Why we’re backing the #SortItOut campaign03/12/2020 11:35:00
Our political director, Frank Young explains why the Centre for Social Justice is backing the #SortItOut campaign.
Use ‘power of our example’ and keep UK’s fossil fuels in the ground to lead world on climate, urges IPPR03/12/2020 10:35:00
The UK and Scottish governments must together develop a new ‘net zero deal’ to keep North Sea oil and gas in the ground and invest in low-carbon industries to replace them, says an IPPR report today.
JRF - Coalition warns it would be a terrible mistake to cut the £20 uplift to Universal Credit01/12/2020 10:35:00
Over 60 organisations and bishops issue a public statement expressing their deep concern at the failure of the Government to announce that they are making the £20 uplift to Universal Credit permanent and extending it to legacy benefits.
Evidence used to justify hospitality closures is “tenuous,” says IEA research01/12/2020 09:35:00
Research from the Institute of Economic Affairs, authored by Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon, casts doubt over the relevance of evidence on which Tier 2 and Tier 3 restrictions on the hospitality sector will be based.
The Spending Review is 'unlikely to be enough to address health and care pressures': The King's Fund responds to the Spending Review26/11/2020 14:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund, responded to the Chancellor’s Spending Review
Initial reaction from IFS researchers on Spending Review 2020 and OBR forecasts26/11/2020 13:35:00
IFS Director Paul Johnson says: “Rishi Sunak has been spending truly astonishing amounts of money this year and plans to continue to do so next year in response to Covid.
Spending Review 2020: IPPR response26/11/2020 12:35:00
Spending review misunderstands 'basic economics' and will leave economy needlessly damaged
Rishi cannot tax our way out of debt or spend our way out of a recession — Adam Smith Institute26/11/2020 11:35:00
Following the spending review by the Chancellor, the Adam Smith Institute’s Deputy Director Matt Kilcoyne criticises the public sector spending splurge