IFG - An independence referendum in 2020 would be a mistake
The SNP’s resounding victory in Scotland – taking 48 of 59 seats – was based on a manifesto calling for a second independence referendum.
While the prime minister has the constitutional power to refuse to let Scotland hold one, this may not be sustainable if Scotland’s pro-independence parties continue to demonstrate they can muster strong public support.
But holding a second independence referendum in 2020, as the SNP has demanded, would be a mistake.
Published by the Institute for Government, A Second Independence Referendum: When and how could Scotland vote again? says the result of the UK general election has set Westminster and Holyrood on a collision course over the future of the Union. But important constitutional decisions should not be rushed.
The first referendum in 2014 took place more than three years after agreement on it was reached in principle. It would also take time for the Scottish government to set out its vision for independence, and for the UK government to develop alternative proposals for a reformed Union with more powers for Scotland, if it chose to do so. There is unlikely to be agreement on the UK’s future relationship with the EU by 2020, so voters would also not have clarity on what remaining in the UK would look like.
The UK government may also wish to make any potential second referendum conditional on the result of the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, which could then be fought explicitly on the question of whether there should be another independence vote.
If the prime minister wants to preserve and strengthen the Union, he should now take the time to develop a positive vision to try to persuade the people of Scotland that their interests lie within the UK. This could include the devolution of additional powers to Edinburgh, new protections for Scotland that prevented Westminster from legislating in devolved areas, and rights for the devolved institutions to be involved in international negotiations and the development of post-Brexit common frameworks.
Akash Paun, senior fellow at the Institute for Government, said:
“A referendum should only take place when Scottish voters can make an informed choice about their constitutional future. Holding an independence referendum in 2020 is not the right move.”
Jess Sargeant, researcher at the Institute for Government, said:
“If a second vote on Scottish independence is to take place, it is important that the process commands legitimacy. The UK and Scottish government must agree on both the principle and the details of the referendum.”
Notes to editors
- Full report can be found here: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
- For more information, including data to reproduce any charts, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org / 0785 031 3791.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - Response to winter economy plan: sensible but not costless24/09/2020 14:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has released the following statement in response to the Winter Economy Plan.
Ethnic minorities most at risk from debt as economic crisis creates Covid-19 ‘double whammy’, finds IPPR24/09/2020 11:35:00
One in eight employed before pandemic are now out of work, more than twice the UK average, according to new analysis by think tank
IFS - Even after the COVID-19 crisis, councils will need billions of extra funding to address a growing funding gap24/09/2020 10:35:00
English councils are facing a financial double whammy, with increases in costs and losses in income as a result of the COVID-19 crisis coming on top of underlying upwards pressures on spending, especially for adults’ and children’s social care services.
King's Fund - Urgent action is needed to improve working conditions for nurses and midwives24/09/2020 09:35:00
New minimum standards to improve working conditions and a review of 12-hour shifts are needed to address exhaustion and burnout among nurses and midwives, according to a new report from The King’s Fund, commissioned by the RCN Foundation.
10pm closing time “from a random policy generator” says IEA expert22/09/2020 12:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to latest coronavirus measures
Every two weeks of lockdown could cost the UK at least £8 billion in lost output, says IEA expert22/09/2020 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, IEA Economics Fellow, commented on the potential economic impact of a second national lockdown
Adam Smith Inst - The state of the (student) unions22/09/2020 10:35:00
The report, from the free market Adam Smith Institute, argues that student unions are perceived as ineffective by students, lack democratic legitimacy, and undermine freedom of association and expression. Extraordinarily, it finds that student unions that receive higher block grants from universities tend to be poorer performing in the National Student Survey.
IFS - Larger funding cuts for schools in poor areas leave them badly placed to deal with COVID-19 challenges22/09/2020 09:35:00
Schools serving more deprived pupils face major challenges over the next few years. Educational inequalities will have widened during lockdown. Planned increases in teacher starting salaries will also weigh more heavily on such schools, given they are more likely to employ new teachers.