IFG - Brexit will not be "done" in 2020 – it will dominate government for years
The UK is set to leave the EU on 31 January 2020 and enter the transition period – a milestone in the Brexit process. But the most complicated tasks lie ahead and many questions about the UK’s departure are still unanswered.
The transition period, scheduled to end on 31 December 2020, leaves the two sides with just a third of the time taken to negotiate the Withdrawal Agreement – but with much more to do.
The next phase will be much broader in scope – covering the economic relationship, security operation and questions such as data-sharing and fisheries. It will only be possible to reach a narrow agreement on some of these areas by the end of the year.
The government also needs to pass at least six pieces of legislation to establish new UK policies for agriculture, fisheries and immigration. It is also likely to need to pass primary legislation to implement the UK–EU future relationship. Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) will have more of a say on the future relationship than MPs in Westminster, limiting Parliament’s ability to shape the deal.
In December of this year big practical changes will come into force, including to immigration and trade. Although almost 30,000 civil servants will be working on Brexit by March 2020, the government is likely to be only partially ready for these changes.
The government has insisted that it will not extend the transition period beyond 2020. This means:
- The time for negotiation will limit the scope of any agreement to a goods-only free trade agreement.
- UK business could be given just weeks to adjust to the details of the future UK–EU relationship.
- The government will need to implement the Northern Irish Protocol – which looks all but impossible.
Every EU member state will have a vote and veto over the deal – which will make negotiations more complicated for the UK. Johnson may have to choose between making major concessions to the EU or walking away without a deal.
Joe Owen, Institute for Government programme director, said:
“If the government’s priority is speed, it will need to make some important sacrifices – on the level of ambition in any deal and the time for both government and businesses to adapt to it. The end of the transition marks the point at which the country will need to undertake a major change – rushing it will cause disruption.”
Notes to editors
- Full report can be found on our website
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
Latest News from
Adam Smith Inst - Response to winter economy plan: sensible but not costless24/09/2020 14:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has released the following statement in response to the Winter Economy Plan.
Ethnic minorities most at risk from debt as economic crisis creates Covid-19 ‘double whammy’, finds IPPR24/09/2020 11:35:00
One in eight employed before pandemic are now out of work, more than twice the UK average, according to new analysis by think tank
IFS - Even after the COVID-19 crisis, councils will need billions of extra funding to address a growing funding gap24/09/2020 10:35:00
English councils are facing a financial double whammy, with increases in costs and losses in income as a result of the COVID-19 crisis coming on top of underlying upwards pressures on spending, especially for adults’ and children’s social care services.
King's Fund - Urgent action is needed to improve working conditions for nurses and midwives24/09/2020 09:35:00
New minimum standards to improve working conditions and a review of 12-hour shifts are needed to address exhaustion and burnout among nurses and midwives, according to a new report from The King’s Fund, commissioned by the RCN Foundation.
10pm closing time “from a random policy generator” says IEA expert22/09/2020 12:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to latest coronavirus measures
Every two weeks of lockdown could cost the UK at least £8 billion in lost output, says IEA expert22/09/2020 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, IEA Economics Fellow, commented on the potential economic impact of a second national lockdown
Adam Smith Inst - The state of the (student) unions22/09/2020 10:35:00
The report, from the free market Adam Smith Institute, argues that student unions are perceived as ineffective by students, lack democratic legitimacy, and undermine freedom of association and expression. Extraordinarily, it finds that student unions that receive higher block grants from universities tend to be poorer performing in the National Student Survey.
IFS - Larger funding cuts for schools in poor areas leave them badly placed to deal with COVID-19 challenges22/09/2020 09:35:00
Schools serving more deprived pupils face major challenges over the next few years. Educational inequalities will have widened during lockdown. Planned increases in teacher starting salaries will also weigh more heavily on such schools, given they are more likely to employ new teachers.