IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Creating and dismantling government departments finds the direct costs of creating a new department start at £15 million, with a further estimated cost of up to £34 million when including loss of productivity as staff adjust to the new organisation.
Moving policy areas between government departments – or creating completely new departments – is one of the prime minister’s key levers of power. But many of the most recent changes seem to have been made without proper forethought and have – in some cases – ended up costing more than any benefits returned.
The authors argue that, while creating a new department can be useful to focus on a high priority issue or to bring together related policy areas, most changes are rushed through either to send a political signal or to reward allies. These changes can end up causing confusion and the hassle of setting up a new organisation distracts from the problem the government wanted to solve.
Tim Durrant, Institute for Government associate director, said:
“Whoever becomes prime minister may want to signal change by moving departments and creating new ones. Instead of making rapid changes and expecting the new department to be up and running immediately, the incoming prime minister should think through what exactly the new department should do, spending time and money to get it up to speed.”
Gemma Tetlow, Institute for Government chief economist, said:
“Jeremy Corbyn has previously suggested two new departments – for labour and housing – and senior Conservative figures, like Dominic Raab, have suggested merging international development into the Foreign Office. But unless these changes are properly planned, the costs can largely outstrip the benefits.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
IEA - Furlough scheme changes reflect need to get “back to reality”31/07/2020 16:20:00
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, commented on changes to the furlough scheme effective tomorrow and calls to extend the scheme
UK banks in “fragile state” as Covid crisis beckons, says new IEA research31/07/2020 15:20:00
The Bank of England’s stewardship of the banking system has “turned out to be a disaster, again” say Kevin Dowd and Dean Buckner
IFS - Young people increasingly concentrated in low-paid occupations, and young men increasingly struggling to progress – even before COVID-1931/07/2020 14:20:00
Recent generations have increasingly been starting their careers in low-paid occupations such as bar staff, waiters, call centre workers and kitchen assistants, despite higher education levels.
‘Another interim stop-gap’: The King’s Fund response to NHS People Plan 20/2130/07/2020 11:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on the expected NHS People Plan and related government announcements
Time to open up our health system to “disruptive innovation,” says new IEA publication28/07/2020 13:35:00
Author Nima Sanandaji outlines how entrepreneurship in healthcare can create better outcomes
Adam Smith Inst - Britain faces mental health crisis post-pandemic, novel psilocybin treatments needed28/07/2020 12:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute and the Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group call for a review of the Schedule 1 status of psilocybin in this new paper.
Austerity ‘ripped resilience out of health and care service’ before Covid-19 crisis hit, says IPPR28/07/2020 11:35:00
Underinvestment in social and community care left four in five hospitals with ‘dangerously low’ spare beds as crisis hit
'More a minor skirmish than a war on obesity‘: The King's Fund responds to the government obesity plan28/07/2020 10:35:00
David Buck, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, responded to the published government obesity plan