IFG - Customs arrangements after Brexit could cost UK traders £4bn
Introducing customs declarations after Brexit would affect up to 180,000 UK traders and could cost traders over £4 billion a year, according to a new study.
Published by Institute for Government (IfG), Implementing Brexit: Customs says preparing the border for Brexit is a huge task with a hard deadline. Being ready for day one requires the Government to orchestrate change across more than thirty government departments and public bodies, as well as over 100 local authority organisations.
Read the report here.
But the report also highlights the critical role played by organisations outside government. It shows the complex web of private sector organisations that must also be ready to ensure UK trade can continue to cross the border on day one after Brexit.
The report adds that while most people recognise the customs cliff edge in the UK, not enough attention is paid to the cliff edge on the other side of the English Channel. Unless Calais, Dunkirk, Rotterdam or other European ports are also ready for Brexit, British exporters will face significant disruption to their supply chains. Preparations on both sides is particularly vital in the case of the Irish land border.
The report offers recommendations to help the UK avoid the customs cliff edge, such as moving customs requirements away from the physical border, retaining access to key EU computer systems and establishing working groups on implementation details with the private sector.
Finally, the report says government must successfully deliver its new customs technology programme to avoid disruption at the border after Brexit – but the system is already facing significant issues because of constricted timelines.
Joe Owen, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government, said:
“The UK Government is only one of many players who need to be ready if disruption is to be minimised on day one after Brexit. But the problem is that everyone from port operators to small traders can only undertake limited preparation while future arrangements are so uncertain.
“When it comes to customs, business faces a canyon not a cliff edge. Disruption can be caused from either side of the border, and we are reliant on the successful preparation of our European partners too.”
Marcus Shepheard, Researcher at the Institute for Government, said:
“The Government has said that new technology will help, but has provided little clarity about how. In fact, it seems unable to manage existing technology. So with less than two years to go, ministers must be clear about what is and what is not feasible.”
For more information, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org / 07850313791.
Latest News from
Policy Exchange - The New Netwar: Countering Extremism Online19/09/2017 10:35:00
In this major new report, Policy Exchange provides a comprehensive analysis of the struggle against online extremism – the ’new Netwar’.
JRF - It's getting harder for those on low incomes to make ends meet19/09/2017 09:35:00
Helen Barnard, Head of Analysis at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, responded to the Monetary Policy Committee's interest rates decision
Adam Smith Inst - UK banking system an accident waiting to happen14/09/2017 12:35:00
New report shows UK banks still sickly, 10 years on from run on Northern Rock
Demos - Britain’s youth say they face barriers to success, prosperity and political engagement14/09/2017 11:35:00
A major new report by Demos think tank for the British Council’s Next Generation research series shows Britain’s young adults feel overburdened by responsibilities, and facing a multitude of barriers to getting ahead. The research reveals that only half of young Britons feel that they live in a socially mobile society.
IFS - Councils concerned about impact of cuts – and uncertain about effects of the business rates retention policy14/09/2017 10:35:00
A new report by researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) uses recent surveys from the Local Government Information Unit (LGiU) and PwC to examine council decision-makers’ views on whether cuts to funding have affected service quality and on the impact of business rates retention scheme (BRRS) on revenues and incentives. It also looks at how these views vary around England.