IFG - Government biased against public borrowing to pay for infrastructure
The Government is using private sector money to keep infrastructure spending ‘off balance sheet’ – even where this appears to be poor value, argues a new report.
Published by the Institute for Government (IfG), Public versus private: how to pick the best infrastructure financing option says the way the Government assesses options and allocates money means it favours private finance to deliver infrastructure. While politically attractive in the short term, off balance sheet private sector money will not always deliver the best deal in the long run.
Private finance contracts have been delivered on time and budget, but private finance initiative (PFI) contracts for waste services and megaprojects such as Metronet show how badly financed infrastructure projects can deliver poor results. Successive governments have not fairly compared public and private borrowing and have failed to collect the evidence needed to make good decisions on whether to pursue public or private financing in the future.
Despite the lack of evidence on the effectiveness of private finance, the Government still expects private investors to raise over 60% of the finance for future projects.
The Government must change the way it accounts, appraises and budgets for infrastructure. The report specifically recommends that the Chancellor set a target of spending 1% of GDP annually on infrastructure in the Spending Review. He should also remove the arbitrary exclusion of private finance from the National Infrastructure Commission’s remit.
Nick Davies, Associate Director at the Institute for Government, said:
“Successive governments have had a clear bias for private finance when it comes to infrastructure. This is despite limited evidence for the benefits of private finance, with examples of the public sector buying out collapsing private finance contracts, such as those used to maintain and renew London Underground’s infrastructure. With private finance once again politically controversial, it’s crucial that the Government makes evidence based financing choices. Private finance should be used when it is better value, not solely when it is off balance sheet.”
This paper is the latest in a series on improving infrastructure decision making in the UK.
For more information, please contact email@example.com / 07825 021 538
Latest News from
Kings Fund - Public satisfaction with the NHS rose sharply in 201907/04/2020 10:35:00
New analysis published by The King’s Fund and the Nuffield Trust shows public satisfaction with the NHS jumped to 60 per cent across the UK in 2019, up 7 percentage points from the year before.
COP26 Postponed: Right decision, but the UK mustn’t ignore its climate targets or leadership role, says IPPR07/04/2020 09:35:00
Plan for the post-Covid-19 crisis economic recovery must be for a low carbon ‘clean recovery’
IEA - Government jobs scheme gives business “wrong incentives”02/04/2020 13:35:00
IEA responds to figures from the British Chambers of Commerce
IFS - Fast choices by government provide generous income support to most workers, but leave some with nothing and others with too much02/04/2020 12:35:00
The government is running two large schemes – the Job Retention Scheme (JRS) for employees and the Self-employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) for the self-employed – and providing more generous benefits in an attempt to protect workers against income losses resulting from the coronavirus.
Adam Smith Inst - Testing times in this coronavirus crisis02/04/2020 11:35:00
A new report by the Adam Smith Institutes argues that if the UK had followed the USA's CDC in allowing private lab testing, and stopped confirmatory testing at a single site (Colindale) then we could have ramped up testing to the same per capita level as those three countries have done.
National Minimum Wage hikes could prove “unsupportable,” says IEA expert02/04/2020 10:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: “The decision to raise the National Living Wage by an unprecedented 6.2%, and other minimum wages by significant amounts, always risked scuppering employment growth, particularly in poorer regions where arbitrary wage hikes could offset the government’s plans to boost investment and jobs.
IFS - For sale: £45 billion of gilts02/04/2020 09:35:00
The Debt Management Office announced that from next Monday, it would be conducting additional gilt auctions in order to raise a total of £45 billion this month.
IEA - Most workers confined to home unable to work productively, report reveals31/03/2020 11:35:00
No more than 15% of healthy workers confined to their homes will work productively, argues new research from the Institute of Economic Affairs.
Covid-19: Emergency support package needed to save ‘children of the pandemic’ from becoming its unseen victims - IPPR31/03/2020 10:35:00
Right to paid parental leave, extra family cash, help accessing online learning and priority use of parks ‘essential’ to protect children from widening poverty, education and health gaps