IFG - Government cannot afford to support business in a no-deal Brexit
If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the government will not be able to support all affected industries, argues a new report by the Institute for Government. Against a backdrop of steeply deteriorating public finances, the government will be forced into impossible choices about which businesses and industries to save. Without clear principles, the fight over subsidies will be swamped by politics.
Published yesterday, Bailout for business in a no-deal Brexit contrasts the simple case of temporary support for sheep-farmers with the messy reality of what is likely to hit UK plc. Damage might arise from anywhere: from soaring export tariffs and queues at the border to duplicate business costs or burdensome red tape.
Conventional business support, normally deployed to help firms grow, is ill-equipped to respond to such a wide spread of harms. A no-deal Brexit will present a uniquely challenging environment for the government to choose who to save and who to let go.
The report argues that the government must:
- Develop clear principles to reflect the purpose and constraints of business support: the government will want to keep afloat companies that might otherwise go bust. But faced with thousands of cases, not every request for help will be worth pursuing, given the need to protect the public purse and fair competition.
- Divide its channels of support into three broad areas: the avoidance of a cash-flow crisis for a company; help with re-establishing a position in a market lost thanks to a no-deal Brexit; and ongoing life-support while no deal conditions last.
- Recognise that it faces severe affordability constraints: during the financial crisis, mechanisms such as Time to Pay for tax, and the Enterprise Finance Guarantee for bank loans, proved effective and affordable. But the ongoing cost for exporters and service firms hit by the tariff and non-tariff barriers that follow a no-deal Brexit runs into the tens of billions and cannot be afforded.
- Hold back from a radical redesign of industrial strategy: the industrial strategy needs a strong and consistent sense of the long-term future to be designed properly, and the period following a no-deal Brexit will be a difficult time for companies or the government to set a course. Money deployed too quickly is easily wasted.
Giles Wilkes, Institute for Government senior fellow, said:
“With a no-deal Brexit, the government would be pursuing a policy that its own analyses suggests will be very damaging to business. It is understandable that they want to play Santa and help UK plc over the ‘bumps in the road’. But faced with so many other calls on the public purse and with little idea of the medium-term direction of the economy, they will have to prepare to play Scrooge instead. Badly spent money might do more harm than good, propping up unviable companies and hurting competition.”
Notes to editors
- Full report can be found here: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
- For more information, including data to reproduce any charts, please contact email@example.com / 0785 031 3791.
Latest News from
IEA: Labour Party is “wrong to focus purely on social housing”21/11/2019 15:35:00
Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to Labour’s manifesto announcement, calling for the biggest council and social house building programme for decades
IEA - Merging taxes not “tinkering with NI thresholds” would better help low-paid21/11/2019 14:35:00
Editorial and Research Fellow Professor Len Shackleton responded to the Conservative Party’s announcement to raise the National Insurance threshold for workers
The King’s Fund responds to the Liberal Democrat manifesto21/11/2019 13:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King's Fund, commented on the Liberal Democrat manifesto
IEA responds to Liberal Democrats’ manifesto21/11/2019 12:35:00
Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs Mark Littlewood commented on the Liberal Democrats’ manifesto
Liberal Democrats Manifesto: A jump to the left on economics, says ASI21/11/2019 11:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to the Liberal Democrats Manifesto announcement.
Demos - Create a National Minimum Wage for the self-employed, says think tank21/11/2019 10:35:00
A new report from Demos looking at financial security for the modern, liquid workforce is calling for the next government to introduce a Self-Employed National Minimum Wage, as a crucial step towards improving financial security for lower paid self-employed workers.
IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults21/11/2019 09:35:00
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council