IFG - Government cannot afford to support business in a no-deal Brexit
If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the government will not be able to support all affected industries, argues a new report by the Institute for Government. Against a backdrop of steeply deteriorating public finances, the government will be forced into impossible choices about which businesses and industries to save. Without clear principles, the fight over subsidies will be swamped by politics.
Published yesterday, Bailout for business in a no-deal Brexit contrasts the simple case of temporary support for sheep-farmers with the messy reality of what is likely to hit UK plc. Damage might arise from anywhere: from soaring export tariffs and queues at the border to duplicate business costs or burdensome red tape.
Conventional business support, normally deployed to help firms grow, is ill-equipped to respond to such a wide spread of harms. A no-deal Brexit will present a uniquely challenging environment for the government to choose who to save and who to let go.
The report argues that the government must:
- Develop clear principles to reflect the purpose and constraints of business support: the government will want to keep afloat companies that might otherwise go bust. But faced with thousands of cases, not every request for help will be worth pursuing, given the need to protect the public purse and fair competition.
- Divide its channels of support into three broad areas: the avoidance of a cash-flow crisis for a company; help with re-establishing a position in a market lost thanks to a no-deal Brexit; and ongoing life-support while no deal conditions last.
- Recognise that it faces severe affordability constraints: during the financial crisis, mechanisms such as Time to Pay for tax, and the Enterprise Finance Guarantee for bank loans, proved effective and affordable. But the ongoing cost for exporters and service firms hit by the tariff and non-tariff barriers that follow a no-deal Brexit runs into the tens of billions and cannot be afforded.
- Hold back from a radical redesign of industrial strategy: the industrial strategy needs a strong and consistent sense of the long-term future to be designed properly, and the period following a no-deal Brexit will be a difficult time for companies or the government to set a course. Money deployed too quickly is easily wasted.
Giles Wilkes, Institute for Government senior fellow, said:
“With a no-deal Brexit, the government would be pursuing a policy that its own analyses suggests will be very damaging to business. It is understandable that they want to play Santa and help UK plc over the ‘bumps in the road’. But faced with so many other calls on the public purse and with little idea of the medium-term direction of the economy, they will have to prepare to play Scrooge instead. Badly spent money might do more harm than good, propping up unviable companies and hurting competition.”
Notes to editors
- Full report can be found here: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
- For more information, including data to reproduce any charts, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org / 0785 031 3791.
Latest News from
The West must avoid “politically dangerous” and “economically costly” confrontation with China, says new IEA briefing paper06/08/2020 12:35:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has released a new briefing paper, authored by IEA Head of Education Dr Stephen Davies and Professor Syed Kamall, the IEA’s Academic and Research Director, who sat on the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee from 2005-2019.
Revealed: value of six big-tech firms has soared $1.9 trillion since Covid, as IPPR urges rethink on who owns our digital data06/08/2020 11:35:00
‘Covid effect’ shows why UK needs new digital regulator and action by local authorities to drive common ownership of data and open access
Planning reforms not the 'radical shake-up' some expected, says IEA expert06/08/2020 10:35:00
Dr Kristian Niemietz, Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the government’s planning proposals
IEA - Business rates are a “poorly-designed” tax in need of reform, says Professor Len Shackleton06/08/2020 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, responded to reports that the Chancellor is considering an increase in business rates for the “most valuable properties”
Policy Exchange - Call for evidence: Building hospitals in the post-Covid era04/08/2020 12:35:00
In the context of the government’s plans to build 40 new hospitals, Policy Exchange is launching a call for evidence to inform a major piece of research into how we should build the next generation of hospitals.
Demos - British public support ban on targeted political ads online04/08/2020 11:35:00
New research has found that calls for greater regulation in political campaigns have a far greater consensus of support among the general public than arguments against regulation.
IFG - Public services were not fit to respond to the coronavirus crisis04/08/2020 10:35:00
Failures in planning and funding cuts meant public services were not well prepared to handle the coronavirus crisis, says a new report from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy.
IFS - Geographical inequality in incomes has been falling, but wealth inequalities are rising04/08/2020 09:35:00
The government pledges to ‘level up’ the country and, more recently, the unequal impacts of the COVID-19 crisis have led to an increased focus on inequalities between places as well as between people.