IFG - New report lays bare the challenge of Brexit law-making
Up to 15 new bills in addition to the Great Repeal Bill could be required to deliver Brexit, finds new research by the Institute for Government (IfG).
The report Legislating Brexit warns that Brexit will place a huge burden on both Parliament and government departments. It says on average each Queen’s Speech only announces 20 new bills, so 15 new Brexit bills before the UK even exits will leave very little space for non-Brexit related legislation.
Departments will need to ruthlessly prioritise other legislation and indeed find non-legislative approaches to achieve policy aims where possible, particularly in the context of the Government’s narrow Commons majority.
The paper warns the extent of legislative change required will inevitably lead to Government using different routes to make Brexit-related changes – such as using secondary legislation to amend primary legation (so-called Henry VIII powers) – which is subject to less parliamentary scrutiny.
Because of this, the paper argues, the Government should resist the temptation to introduce non-essential changes in the repeal bill. Instead, the priority should be to copy across the acquis, which can be amended after Brexit.
The paper also makes several recommendations for how the Government should manage Brexit-related bills, including publishing white papers with full impact assessments and scheduling the legislative programme to allow the timely passage of the secondary legislation needed before exit.
The paper also makes several recommendations for parliamentarians. Both the Commons and the Lords must get involved at an early stage, pressing the Government to publish white papers and introduce bills in draft wherever possible. They must also time their evidence sessions and reports carefully to maximise impact on new areas of policy.
Dr Hannah White, IfG Director of Research, said:
"The legislation required for Brexit will leave little parliamentary time for anything else – and making a success of it will require a large volume of bills and secondary legislation to be passed by Parliament against a hard deadline. It will be a challenge for both the Government and Parliament to do all this while still ensuring full scrutiny and leaving room for the Government’s domestic policy agenda.”
The paper offers a plausible timetable for the repeal bill:
- a white paper before Easter recess 2017
- a bill introduced following the Queen’s Speech in May
- second reading and bill entering committee before the summer recess
- committee stages continuing into September and if necessary beyond the conference recess
- Lords stages during the remainder of 2017
- Royal Assent in early 2018 with provisions of the Act brought into force as appropriate thereafter.
For more information, please contact Nicole Valentinuzzi on 07850313791.
Notes to editors
- The report can be found on our website or available upon request.
- The Institute for Government (IfG) is an independent think tank working to make government more effective.
Latest News from
IEA - Obesity Health Alliance proposals are “illiberal and unscientific”28/09/2021 15:25:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Obesity Health Alliance’s 10-year strategy
Labour’s £28 billion investment pledge to achieve net zero is ‘welcome recognition’ of scale of challenge, says IPPR28/09/2021 13:15:00
Think tank also backs case for taxing income from wealth at similar rates to income from work
It could take until 2033 to clear cancer treatment backlog in England, finds IPPR and CF28/09/2021 10:35:00
Pandemic toll on cancer services revealed in new analysis, with an estimated 19,500 missing cancer diagnoses due to missed referrals
People living in the poorest areas waiting longer for hospital treatment: The King’s Fund and Healthwatch England share new analysis28/09/2021 09:35:00
The King’s Fund and Healthwatch England jointly call for urgent action to address hospital waiting lists and improve patients’ experience of delays to treatment .
Bank of England wrong to continue policy of quantitative easing, says IEA expert24/09/2021 10:15:00
Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), commented on the Bank of England’s decision to continue its policy of quantitative easing Julian
The pandemic has further opened up deep health inequalities: The King’s Fund responds to new life expectancy data for 2020 from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)24/09/2021 09:15:00
Dr Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, commented on the 2020 life expectancy data released by the ONS yesterday
The UK should introduce a British innovation principle, says new IEA research23/09/2021 13:15:00
The UK should introduce a British innovation principe, says new IEA research
JRF - What does a “very difficult winter” look like for low-income families?23/09/2021 12:15:00
New analysis on the planned £20-a-week cut to Universal Credit and the rising cost of living.
Tax bumper pandemic profits to kickstart a fairer and stronger post-crisis economy, says IPPR22/09/2021 14:20:00
In a major publication ahead of the party conferences of the two main parties, the IPPR think tank has set out a vision for the economic recovery that rebalances power and spreads prosperity across the country.