IFG - No-deal Brexit would be high-stakes gamble with the Union
A no-deal Brexit would be highly controversial in all three devolved nations and increase risks to the Union itself, argues a new report by the Institute for Government.
No deal and the Union finds that since Boris Johnson became prime minister, engagement between Westminster and the administrations in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales has declined. Short-term no-deal planning has diverted attention away from longer-term questions about the relationship between the UK and devolved governments. No deal will mean no transition period, so unresolved issues will need to be addressed immediately in what will be a highly charged political atmosphere.
Johnson’s commitment to strengthen and protect the Union is in direct tension with his promise to implement Brexit by 31 October with or without a deal.
In the event of no deal, the authors say the Union will come under direct threat:
- Restoring the Northern Ireland executive will become much more difficult, and pressure for a border poll on the island of Ireland is likely to increase.
- The Scottish government has signalled its intention to accelerate its plans for a second independence referendum and support for independence may increase.
- A modest independence movement has developed in Wales and this may continue to grow if dissatisfaction is not addressed.
The government must develop a new strategy to strengthen the Union. This should be designed to improve Whitehall’s approach to devolved issues, and set out a new approach to joint working between the UK and devolved governments. The government should accept that the Union is a voluntary partnership between the four parts of the UK, each of which has the right to self-determination.
A no-deal Brexit will cause significant disruption throughout the UK. Some consequences, including for the agriculture and fisheries sectors, will be felt particularly acutely in Scotland and Wales. But it is in Northern Ireland – where departmental functions are currently exercised by civil servants without ministerial direction – that the consequences will be most severe. To manage these consequences the UK government will need to impose direct rule, and work closely with Dublin to mitigate a likely backlash against this.
Akash Paun, Institute for Government senior fellow, said:
“If the Union is to survive and prosper, people in all parts of the country need to be persuaded of the value of remaining within the UK. The UK government needs a new strategy to make the positive case for the Union and improve its approach to working with the devolved governments.”
Jess Sargeant, Institute for Government researcher, said:
“No deal will make intergovernmental relationships much more challenging, but meaningful engagement between the UK and devolved governments will be necessary for negotiations on future international agreements. If the UK government continues with the same approach it has taken to EU negotiations, the cracks in the Union are likely to widen.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
IEA: Labour Party is “wrong to focus purely on social housing”21/11/2019 15:35:00
Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to Labour’s manifesto announcement, calling for the biggest council and social house building programme for decades
IEA - Merging taxes not “tinkering with NI thresholds” would better help low-paid21/11/2019 14:35:00
Editorial and Research Fellow Professor Len Shackleton responded to the Conservative Party’s announcement to raise the National Insurance threshold for workers
The King’s Fund responds to the Liberal Democrat manifesto21/11/2019 13:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King's Fund, commented on the Liberal Democrat manifesto
IEA responds to Liberal Democrats’ manifesto21/11/2019 12:35:00
Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs Mark Littlewood commented on the Liberal Democrats’ manifesto
Liberal Democrats Manifesto: A jump to the left on economics, says ASI21/11/2019 11:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to the Liberal Democrats Manifesto announcement.
Demos - Create a National Minimum Wage for the self-employed, says think tank21/11/2019 10:35:00
A new report from Demos looking at financial security for the modern, liquid workforce is calling for the next government to introduce a Self-Employed National Minimum Wage, as a crucial step towards improving financial security for lower paid self-employed workers.
IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults21/11/2019 09:35:00
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council