IFG - Politicians should devolve power to local authorities
New IEA paper calls for greater devolution and fiscal decentralisation
Recent proposals to balance the share of power across the UK are flawed. ‘English Votes for English Measures’, the creation of an English Parliament and other suggested reforms would see power split unequally whilst failing to decentralise fiscal responsibility. As such they would undermine the potential economic benefits of greater devolution.
‘English Votes for English Measures’ would widen the scope of MP’s responsibilities even further. Currently, Members of Parliament find themselves torn between holding government to account while working towards political promotion. Devolution would better allow them to concentrate on the essentials of national government
In Slicing up the public sector: A radical proposal for devolution, Tom Packer and Matthew Sinclair outline the benefits of devolving power from Westminster. While some responsibilities should remain with central government, considerable scope exists for devolving most other policy areas to local authorities.
Providing local authorities with the power to raise and spend their own revenue would encourage them to make better use of taxpayers’ money, and moving decision making on policy areas such as health, welfare and the environment closer to those affected would dramatically improve accountability. Care must be taken, however, to ensure devolution does not create additional layers of burdensome regulation, undermining any potential economic gains.
Allowing local governments to experiment with policies in order to test their effectiveness would also result in better government. An example of this is the adoption of an initiative allowing residents to view all items of government expenditure costing over £500, originally implemented by The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead in 2009.
Proposals for devolution:
- Taxation – Expecting local authorities to raise the revenue they spend would make voters more aware of how their money is being spent. This could be done through taxing incomes or revenues from natural resources. In order to protect individuals from excessive regional tax increases, any tax rise over a certain threshold should be approved by local voters.
- Health – Devolving power over healthcare would mean local authorities would have greater freedom to innovate and respond to local conditions. Switzerland’s highly decentralised healthcare system provides a responsive service with strong patient satisfaction and high life expectancy. Giving devolved governments discretion over public health regulation would allow voters to live in areas that better match their lifestyle preferences.
- Welfare – Providing local governments with greater flexibility over welfare policy could significantly reduce welfare dependency in the UK. National government might still be required to provide funding for pensions due to the scale of unfunded spending commitments.
- Environmental policy – Considerable decentralisation of environmental policy already exists in the UK. Local authorities are far better placed to manage environmental concerns if they are in close proximity to the individuals affected.
- Borrowing - Although local authorities would be allowed to borrow in order to finance spending under certain conditions, Westminster would remain responsible for existing national debt, placing reasonable restrictions on regional borrowing.
Commenting on the research, Professor Philip Booth, Editorial and Programme Director at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“The UK has much to gain from devolution. Local governments will be far more responsive to the needs of their voters if they have to raise taxation themselves and are responsibile for the delivery of public services currently provided by central government. Policy outcomes would also be better because it would allow for greater experimentation and responsiveness to local preferences. Fiscal decentralisation would also see a reduction in wasteful spending as regional powers would be under constant scrutiny from the taxpayer.”
Notes to Editors:
To arrange an interview about the report please contact Camilla Goodwin, Communications Officer:email@example.com or 07821 971 443.
The full report, Slicing up the public sector: A radical proposal for devolution by Tom Packer and Matthew Sinclair can be downloaded here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
Latest News from
Work Foundation - Outdated attitudes risk widening inequalities in hybrid workplace, think-tank warns15/10/2021 15:10:00
Employers could undo the progress made over the last 18 months and deepen workplace inequalities if organisations fail to override the deep-rooted perceptions of ‘office culture’, a leading think tank has warned.
The King's Fund responds to the Department of Health and Social Care announcement to improve access to general practice14/10/2021 13:15:00
Beccy Baird, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, commented on the announcement from NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care of a blueprint to improve access to general practice
JRF - Invest in social housing to fix 'policy black hole' for almost 1m families paying private rents they can't afford13/10/2021 15:10:00
New analysis from JRF highlights that almost one million families on low incomes in England (956,000) are paying rents they cannot afford in the private rented sector.
No need for further tax rises after promising GDP figures, says IEA expert13/10/2021 13:20:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP figures, published by the ONS today
IEA - Bad policy is to blame for heavy industry’s woes12/10/2021 10:35:00
Andy Mayer, Chief Operating Officer at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on calls to bail out energy-intensive industries
IFS - Despite planning biggest tax rises in more than 25 years, and an historic increase in size of the state, the Chancellor is still likely to have little money for hard-pressed public12/10/2021 09:35:00
This year’s historic, and manifesto-breaking, announcements of tax rises will increase the UK’s tax take to its highest sustained level in peacetime. Spending will settle at 42% of national income, more than 2% above its pre-pandemic level and its highest level in ‘normal times’ since 1985.
IEA economist comments on ending of furlough scheme30/09/2021 12:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the ending of furlough scheme
IPPR - Revealed: NHS and care integration postcode lottery leading to unequal access to treatment and support30/09/2021 11:35:00
Following the new funding announced for the NHS and social care system, the IPPR think tank warns that improved outcomes will only be delivered if combined with changes to the way healthcare is organised and how services work together.
IFS - Londoners face quadruple whammy of labour market challenges as furlough scheme ends30/09/2021 10:35:00
Workers in London look in the most precarious position as the furlough scheme comes to an end today. During the pandemic, Londoners have suffered from higher rates of redundancy, lower rates of re-employment after redundancy and lower growth in vacancies. In addition, the latest data show they were still more likely to be furloughed this summer than other parts of the country. These challenges compound to heighten the risk of longer-term unemployment in the capital.