IFG - Problems exposed by the Brexit parliament will persist without proper reform
Long-standing problems with how parliament works and how MPs perform their duties have yet to be addressed, says a new report from the Institute for Government.
Published yesterday, Parliamentary Monitor 2020 is an-depth look at the so-called Brexit parliament which ran from 2017 to 2019. The report finds that Brexit, combined with minority government, had a profound and detrimental effect on the relationship between the government and parliament, and pushed parliamentary procedure to its limit.
Battles over parliamentary rules highlighted the need to update and clarify procedures. Questions remain about how much control the government should have over parliament’s agenda, how emergency debates and humble addresses should be used, the meaning of certain parliamentary terms, and the role of the Speaker. Worrying weaknesses in how parliament scrutinises government legislation were exposed once again. Despite the challenging circumstances, parliament largely continued to fulfil its functions beyond Brexit and spent most of its time considering other issues.
The initial phase of the coronavirus crisis has seen parliamentary consensus around radical, but temporary, changes in how parliament works. Despite this, there is real risk that the problems which defined the 2017–19 parliament could re-emerge without proper reform.
As parliament addresses the problems exposed over the past few years and grapples with the coronavirus crisis, the report sets out three priorities for parliament:
- Ensure there is adequate parliamentary scrutiny of the government. This is particularly pressing given the extraordinarily broad powers being exercised by the government in response to coronavirus.
- Improve and maintain parliament’s technical capability and ability to work remotely. Any moves to return parliament to its usual ways of working following coronavirus reforms should not disadvantage members unable to attend in person.
- Review (and where necessary reform) the areas of parliamentary procedure that proved most contentious during the 2017–19 parliament.
During the 2017–19 parliament, the report finds that:
- The cost of MPs’ security assistance rose to almost 2000% above pre-2015 levels – as MPs faced unprecedented threats to their safety.
- The government used its control of parliamentary time to avoid scheduling any opposition-led debates over a five-month period between late 2018 and early 2019 – a key period in the Brexit process.
- Parliament approved extraordinarily broad powers to make secondary legislation to prepare for Brexit – in exchange for only small improvements in parliamentary oversight.
- Minority government, Brexit and an amenable Speaker gave backbench MPs more influence than usual, which may have had a cultural impact that proves hard to reverse.
- High Brexit drama sparked public interest in parliament, with a 150% increase in parliamentlive.tv audiences between 2017 and 2019 and over six million signing an e-petition to revoke Article 50 – the most popular petition parliament has ever received.
Joe Marshall, senior researcher at the Institute for Government and report author said:
“The coronavirus crisis has put the political turmoil of the Brexit parliament into sharp perspective. However, the events of the 2017–19 parliament will have a lasting impact. They raised questions about where sovereignty lies in the UK constitution and highlighted the need to update and clarify contentious parliamentary procedures. If the scars of the last parliament are not addressed, these problems may re-emerge in future.”
Alice Lilly, senior researcher at the Institute for Government and report author said:
“The 2017–19 parliament saw MPs and peers grapple with various important and high-profile issues – including Brexit, allegations of bullying and harassment and increased security concerns. Yet, at the same time, the conditions for reaching consensus – majority government and strong party loyalty – slipped away, making it more difficult for parliament to function.”
Notes to editors
- Full report is attached and will be available here: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
- For more information, including data to reproduce any charts, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org/ 0785 031 3791.
Latest News from
NLGN - Councils economic confidence plummets but faith in community hits all-time high28/05/2020 13:35:00
New Local Government Network’s (NLGN) Leadership Index has found economic confidence at its lowest levels since the survey began, as over three-quarters of council heads call for more funding to deal with the impact of COVID-19.
Civitas - Twelve ideas for regenerating a UK economic recovery after lockdown28/05/2020 12:35:00
What should the Government do to encourage rapid economic recovery from the lockdown while pledging its one-nation commitment to spreading prosperity across all sections of society?
IEA expert comments on launch of test and trace system28/05/2020 11:35:00
From a civil liberties perspective we are "not out of the woods," says Victoria Hewson
IPPR - UK must go ‘faster, further and fairer’ to combat climate and nature crisis and rebuild economy, says cross-party commission28/05/2020 10:35:00
A cross-party commission proposes that only by going “faster, further, fairer” can we seize the significant national and global opportunities of a net-zero economy. That would enable the UK to unlock new high-skilled and high-paid jobs, develop dynamic businesses and improve the health and wellbeing for all citizens, it says.
IFS - Parents, especially mothers, paying heavy price for lockdown28/05/2020 09:35:00
School closures, massive rates of job loss and furloughing, and a shift to working from home are all affecting how parents spend their time, and how mothers and fathers divide responsibilities for paid work, housework and childcare.
“Very unlikely” current welfare system will survive the Covid-19 pandemic, says new IEA briefing26/05/2020 12:35:00
Coronavirus will bring to a head discontent with the welfare system and strengthen support for a Universal Basic Income, says Dr Stephen Davies in a new briefing paper
Welfare inequalities revealed by Covid crisis show why UK must modernise and 'future-proof' welfare state, says IPPR26/05/2020 11:35:00
Think tank launches year-long review into future of the welfare state led by high profile figures including Bishop Rose Hudson-Wilkin and Lord Heseltine
Government needs to wean the UK off this extraordinary level of state subsidy as soon as possible, says IEA expert26/05/2020 10:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to the latest statistics from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on government borrowing and debt