IFG - Public services were not fit to respond to the coronavirus crisis
Failures in planning and funding cuts meant public services were not well prepared to handle the coronavirus crisis, says a new report from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy.
How fit were public services for coronavirus? sets out an assessment of how prepared and resilient public services, such as the NHS, schools and the police, were for the pandemic.
The report’s ‘fitness ratings’ chart shows important gaps in emergency plans, with the government failing to learn lessons from Exercise Cygnus, the last major exercise to prepare for a pandemic. Public services have also been constrained by a decade of budget pressure in which their scope and quality declined, staff became more stretched, buildings weren’t maintained, and vital equipment went unbought.
While all services benefited from the existence of emergency plans and command structures, these varied greatly in detail, focus and adaptability. The report says serious questions must be answered about whether these services could and should have been better prepared and more resilient.
The report found that:
- Government plans were too focused on a flu pandemic, with not enough attention paid to the possibility of other types of pandemic
- Good planning ensured that hospitals could respond well to the first wave, but high staff vacancies and a maintenance backlog will make it far harder to restart routine services
- Adult social care services struggled because of poor quality national plans, weak communication between Whitehall and local government, and the large number of care homes
- Police and prison services had experience of handling emergencies, but underinvestment in buildings and ICT meant the criminal justice system, particularly in criminal courts and prisons, struggled to respond
- However, planning for a no-deal Brexit in 2019 meant the Department of Health and Social Care had a greater understanding of how supply chains would be disrupted in a pandemic and had improved its stockpiles of some drugs.
The report recommends that:
- The government ought to conduct more regular pandemic planning exercises, with key ministers such as the prime minister and health secretary taking part within six months of taking office
- Government departments, agencies, local authorities, police forces, NHS bodies and other providers of public services must publish their plans for dealing with emergencies and should report annually on progress implementing the key findings from planning exercises
- Select committees scrutinise departmental plans for emergencies and hold government to account for resolving shortcomings identified in major exercises
- The government must analyse the resilience of public services when making spending decisions, including an assessment of the ability of staffing, equipment, and buildings to cope with scenarios identified in emergency plans
- Government departments and agencies should maintain an updated list of trained reserves, recent leavers and volunteers who can be quickly deployed in an emergency
- Government departments should identify and fill data gaps that prevent it from making real-time assessments of demand and capacity in critical public services.
Nick Davies, programme director at the Institute for Government, said:
“Frontline staff have performed remarkably during the crisis, in extraordinarily difficult circumstances. But public services have faltered due to decisions made over the past decade.
“Greater investment in staff, buildings and equipment would have left services far better placed to respond to coronavirus. The government must learn from these mistakes, reflect on where public services are least resilient, and ensure that key services are better prepared for either a second wave of coronavirus or any future pandemic.”
Rob Whiteman, CIPFA CEO, said:
“A decade of austerity has resulted in over-stretched and under-resourced public services that were already facing rising demand before the pandemic struck. Covid-19 supercharged these pressures, with adult social care facing particular strain.
“In addition to meeting the additional costs resulting from the pandemic and enhancing emergency planning procedures, the government must utilise the current momentum as a catalyst for adult social care reform.”
Notes to editors:
Latest News from
IFG - Disputes over Brexit increase the need to strengthen the Sewel convention17/09/2020 10:35:00
A new Institute for Government paper says the future of the Union could be put at risk without reforms to the principle of legislative consent which lies at the heart of the devolution settlement.
IFS - Large variation in earnings returns among postgraduate degrees, with returns of more than 15% for masters in business and law, but negative returns for many arts and humanities courses17/09/2020 09:35:00
Women with a masters degree earn considerably more at age 35 than those with only an undergraduate degree, with average earnings of £35,400, compared with £32,500 for those who do not go beyond undergraduate level. For men, the differences are even larger: masters graduates earn £55,800 on average, £5,000 more than those with only an undergraduate degree.
IFS - The long shadow of deprivation: Differences in opportunities across England15/09/2020 15:20:00
A socially mobile country provides equal opportunities for everyone, across big cities and small towns, and regardless of whether your parents are rich or poor. This report makes use of newly linked administrative data on all state-educated pupils born between 1986 and 1988 to follow a group of sons from where they grew up, looking at their family circumstances and their educational achievement, through to the labour market.
IPPR welcomes furlough reform plan proposed by Labour at TUC Conference15/09/2020 14:20:00
The think tank had previously called for such a scheme to prevent mass unemployment by encouraging part-time working
Labour market deterioration “not (yet) as bad as feared”, says IEA expert15/09/2020 12:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to the latest unemployment statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
JRF - Targeted furlough scheme needed as new research shows who is likely to lose their job15/09/2020 11:35:00
A new Pre-Vaccine Jobs Risk Index produced for JRF shows that sectors such as hospitality, retail and beauty, which rely on close contact with members of the public but are not within the sphere of health, care or essential services are likely to be hit hardest by coronavirus until a vaccine is found.
IFG - Deal or no deal, the government should adopt its own state aid regime15/09/2020 10:35:00
The UK would benefit from a strong ‘state aid’ system whether or not it strikes a trade deal with the EU, says a new report from the Institute for Government.
Demos - New research finds social fractures caused by Covid-19 are more divisive than Brexit15/09/2020 09:35:00
New research from the cross-party think tank Demos has found that Covid-19 has now caused deeper social fractures than Brexit. The poll finds that over half of mask wearers in Britain (58%) have severely negative attitudes towards non-mask wearers, and the vast majority (68%) of people who did not break lockdown rules have strong negative views about lockdown rule breakers.
Work Foundation report calls for Government to mitigate crisis facing retail workers10/09/2020 11:35:00
A new report from a leading UK think tank reveals the extent of insecurity within the retail sector and calls on Government to intervene and mitigate the crisis facing hundreds of thousands of workers.