IFG - Questions over Home Office role in immigration after Brexit
The Home Office may not be the right department to manage immigration policy after Brexit, argues a new report by the Institute for Government.
Published last week, Managing migration after Brexit says the Home Office is not ready or able to meet the challenge of ending free movement after we leave the EU. The report lays bare the flaws in the immigration system that have led to a series of crises and to reorganisations designed to solve the last set of problems rather than address future needs.
The report also points to other failings, including unrealistic targets, policies based on politics rather than evidence (such as the ‘hostile environment’) and poor decision making, meaning that over half of appeals against the Home Office are successful.
Major policy changes in the Home Office have also been implemented without adequate scrutiny by MPs and peers. For example, Parliament has had little say over the fact that the UK charges 20 times more to migrate here than does Canada and that some immigration fees have increased by 500% in recent years. The Home Secretary also has extensive powers over the decisions in individual cases - unlike any comparable minister.
All these concerns existed before Brexit. Leaving the EU will mean that responsibility for managing EU migration, vital to the UK economy after Brexit, comes under Home Office control. The report calls for a review into whether responsibility for immigration policy should continue to sit with the department.
The authors set out a six-point plan to improve migration policy:
- The Government must agree clear objectives for the new immigration system after Brexit.
- The Home Secretary must update Parliament each year on how far those objectives are met.
- Immigration policy should be based on an understanding of the social and economic role that migrants play in the UK, rather than net migration targets. The Home Secretary should publish a comprehensive data strategy to make this analysis possible.
- The Home Secretary should legislate to simplify immigration rules.
- The Migration Advisory Committee should be more independent of the Home Office, reflecting its increasing importance.
- The Home Secretary should immediately launch the review of the department that was promised last year, defining exactly what he means by a Home Office that is “fit for the modern world”.
Joe Owen, Associate Director at the Institute for Government and author of the report, said:
“As we end free movement from the EU, our migration policy must address the needs of the country but also the public confidence challenge. Ministers need to consider whether the Home Office is the right permanent home for a migration policy that needs to serve labour market needs, be fair and efficient in dealing with applicants, and provide the necessary degree of assurance to the wider public.”
Jill Rutter, Programme Director for Brexit, added:
“‘Taking back control’ of immigration means taking responsibility for the problems in the current system. The UK currently depends on workers from the EU to meet skills gaps and labour shortages. The task of managing immigration will completely change in both scale and importance once free movement ends.”
Stephen Hale OBE, Chief Executive of Refugee Action said:
“Institutional failures at the Home Office are literally a matter of life and death for people seeking asylum in the UK. This report lays out the scale of the problems and a clear way forward. The Home Secretary must act now, setting clear short and longer-term objectives for the department and UK immigration policy.”
Sunder Katwala, Director of British Future, said:
“Investing in a system that works competently and effectively is key to rebuilding public trust on immigration. This welcome report lays bare the failings and underperformance of the Home Office and makes constructive recommendations to fix some of the most pressing issues.”
Notes to editors
- The report is available on our website.
- The Institute for Government is an independent think tank that works to make government more effective.
- For more information, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org / 0785 031 3791.
Latest News from
IEA: Labour Party is “wrong to focus purely on social housing”21/11/2019 15:35:00
Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs Dr Kristian Niemietz responded to Labour’s manifesto announcement, calling for the biggest council and social house building programme for decades
IEA - Merging taxes not “tinkering with NI thresholds” would better help low-paid21/11/2019 14:35:00
Editorial and Research Fellow Professor Len Shackleton responded to the Conservative Party’s announcement to raise the National Insurance threshold for workers
The King’s Fund responds to the Liberal Democrat manifesto21/11/2019 13:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King's Fund, commented on the Liberal Democrat manifesto
IEA responds to Liberal Democrats’ manifesto21/11/2019 12:35:00
Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs Mark Littlewood commented on the Liberal Democrats’ manifesto
Liberal Democrats Manifesto: A jump to the left on economics, says ASI21/11/2019 11:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to the Liberal Democrats Manifesto announcement.
Demos - Create a National Minimum Wage for the self-employed, says think tank21/11/2019 10:35:00
A new report from Demos looking at financial security for the modern, liquid workforce is calling for the next government to introduce a Self-Employed National Minimum Wage, as a crucial step towards improving financial security for lower paid self-employed workers.
IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults21/11/2019 09:35:00
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council