IFG - Questions over future of UK legal system after Brexit
Parliament must urgently clarify the future of the UK’s legal system after Brexit, a new report argues.
Published yesterday by the Institute for Government (IfG), Brexit and the European Court of Justice says that ministers have left fundamental questions unanswered on the status of European Court decisions after the UK leaves the European Union.
The Government has said that pre-Brexit decisions of the European Court will be incorporated into UK law, but has not said how British judges should treat future decisions. This could leave judges exposed to a fierce political battle.
With the Repeal Bill set to go before MPs imminently, the report urges Parliament to avoid dangerous ambiguity in the legal system by instructing UK courts to take account of post-Brexit European Court of Justice decisions when they are relevant.
This would mean European Court decisions were no longer binding on UK courts in line with the Government’s ambition to take “back control of our laws” after Brexit. It would also allow British judges to draw on helpful precedents as they do from other foreign courts.
The report says the role of the European Court of Justice could be a serious stumbling block in the Brexit negotiations because the EU will want it to be the final arbitrator on the rights of citizens and the divorce bill.
Jill Rutter, Brexit Programme Director at the Institute for Government, said:
“The Prime Minister has promised to end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. If only it were that simple. The court’s role is not one issue but many, and the Government so far has only come up with some of the answers. As MPs gear up to scrutinise the Repeal Bill, they should adopt a more comprehensive approach to avoid a legal muddle after we leave the EU.”
Raphael Hogarth, report author, said:
“Parliament should protect the independence of the UK judiciary by ensuring that responsibility for setting the terms of the post-Brexit constitutional order is seen to rest firmly in Westminster, not beneath a wig.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
Policy Exchange - The Clean Growth Strategy: worth the wait?17/10/2017 13:35:00
The Clean Growth Strategy, published last week after long being delayed, signifies a step change in Government thinking and is ambitious in its scope.
IPPR - New programme to reduce exclusions in England and make The Difference for vulnerable students17/10/2017 12:35:00
Excluded children cost the Government £2.1bn every year, while permanent exclusions have risen 40% in the last 3 years
IEA - The government’s proposed cap on energy prices is likely to backfire17/10/2017 11:35:00
Reaction to the announcement on proposed cap on energy prices
JRF - 600,000 more people face rent shortfalls17/10/2017 10:35:00
This shows why Government must end the benefits freeze and uprate Local Housing Allowance.
IFS - Low-income households increasingly exposed to rent increases17/10/2017 09:35:00
The rented sector is growing. The proportion of people in Great Britain living in private rented accommodation has more than doubled, from 8% in the mid 1990s to 19% in the mid 2010s, while among 25- to 34-year-olds this proportion has trebled from 12% to 37%. Over the same period, average private rents have risen by 33% in real terms.