IFG - Questions over future of UK legal system after Brexit
Parliament must urgently clarify the future of the UK’s legal system after Brexit, a new report argues.
Published yesterday by the Institute for Government (IfG), Brexit and the European Court of Justice says that ministers have left fundamental questions unanswered on the status of European Court decisions after the UK leaves the European Union.
The Government has said that pre-Brexit decisions of the European Court will be incorporated into UK law, but has not said how British judges should treat future decisions. This could leave judges exposed to a fierce political battle.
With the Repeal Bill set to go before MPs imminently, the report urges Parliament to avoid dangerous ambiguity in the legal system by instructing UK courts to take account of post-Brexit European Court of Justice decisions when they are relevant.
This would mean European Court decisions were no longer binding on UK courts in line with the Government’s ambition to take “back control of our laws” after Brexit. It would also allow British judges to draw on helpful precedents as they do from other foreign courts.
The report says the role of the European Court of Justice could be a serious stumbling block in the Brexit negotiations because the EU will want it to be the final arbitrator on the rights of citizens and the divorce bill.
Jill Rutter, Brexit Programme Director at the Institute for Government, said:
“The Prime Minister has promised to end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. If only it were that simple. The court’s role is not one issue but many, and the Government so far has only come up with some of the answers. As MPs gear up to scrutinise the Repeal Bill, they should adopt a more comprehensive approach to avoid a legal muddle after we leave the EU.”
Raphael Hogarth, report author, said:
“Parliament should protect the independence of the UK judiciary by ensuring that responsibility for setting the terms of the post-Brexit constitutional order is seen to rest firmly in Westminster, not beneath a wig.”
Notes to editors
Latest News from
The King's Fund response to NHS Improvement's quarterly performance report22/02/2018 12:35:00
Richard Murray, Director of Policy for The King’s Fund, said: ‘It is alarming that NHS providers now forecast a £931 million deficit for this financial year, a deterioration of more than £300 million in three months. This reflects the dramatic decline in the finances of a number of individual trusts, and raises serious questions about how reasonable the financial targets were in the first place.
Adam Smith Inst - Mutually Assured Prosperity22/02/2018 11:35:00
Matt Kilcoyne, Head of Communications at the ASI, commented on David Davis' recent speech where he called on European Union partners and member states to agree mutual recognition on the basis of trust the Adam Smith Institute says that the government's Brexit secretary is speaking sense.
IFS analysis of yesterday’s public finance figures22/02/2018 10:35:00
Yesterday, the Office for National Statistics and HM Treasury published Public Sector Finances January 2018. We now have details of central government receipts, central government spending, public sector net investment, borrowing and debt for the first ten months of financial year 2017−18.
IPPR Scotland: Ending the Benefit Cap and ‘Rape Clause’ in Scotland could lift 15,000 out of poverty22/02/2018 09:35:00
IPPR Scotland has analysed the impact of current proposed income tax cuts on the lowest earners in Scotland.
JRF - Nearly one in three adults out of work as Northern Ireland makes no progress on poverty in a decade20/02/2018 13:35:00
Almost one in three working-age adults in Northern Ireland are out of work, as a new report shows how Northern Ireland’s employment rate is lagging behind the rest of Great Britain.