IFS - An assessment of the potential compensation provided by the new ‘National Living Wage’ for the personal tax and benefit measures announced for implementation in the current parliament
The briefing note, prepared for the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee, documents the estimated distributional impact of the tax and benefit changes that have been announced for implementation in the current parliament.
It then considers the extent to which households might expect the net losses from these changes to be offset through increased wages as a result of the large increase in the minimum wage for those aged 25 and over that was announced in the July 2015 Budget.
- A package of changes to the tax, tax credit and benefit system has been announced for implementation in the current parliament as part of the government’s deficit reduction programme. These will reduce household incomes significantly, particularly for those towards the bottom of the income distribution. The July 2015 Budget also announced a substantial increase in the national minimum wage for those aged 25 and over, which the Chancellor described as a new “National Living Wage” (NLW).
- If the NLW were to have no effect on GDP, employment or hours of work it would offset 27% of the drop in household incomes from the impact of net tax and benefit reforms. In fact, as the Office for Budget Responsibility stresses, the NLW is likely to depress GDP and employment, and the money for it has to come from somewhere so this can be taken as a “better case” scenario, at least in the short term.
- The new NLW offers such little compensation because the boost to gross wages is smaller than the announced fiscal tightening and almost one-third of the increase in gross wages goes to the Treasury in higher tax receipts and lower benefits and tax-credit entitlements.
- Among the 8.4 million working age households who are currently eligible for benefits or tax credits who do contain someone in paid work the average loss from the cuts to benefits and tax credits is £750 per year. Among this same group the average gain from the new NLW, is estimated at £200 per year (in a “better case” scenario). This suggests that those in paid work and eligible for benefits or tax credits are, on average, being compensated for 26% of their losses from changes to taxes, tax credits and benefits through the new NLW.
- The average losses from tax and benefit changes in deciles 2, 3 and 4 of the household income distribution are £1,340, £980 and £690 per year, respectively. These same groups are estimated to gain £90, £120 and £160 from the new NLW (again on a “better case” scenario). This suggests that a “better case” estimate of the compensation these groups are receiving is 7%, 13% and 24% respectively, on average.
- There may be strong arguments for introducing the new NLW, but it should not be considered a direct substitute for benefits and tax credits aimed at lower income households.
Latest News from
King's Fund - Boost for local health partnerships as six areas secure place on £3 million grant-funding programme14/01/2021 12:35:00
Six areas in England have been chosen to join the first phase of a major grant-funding and development programme designed to improve the health and wellbeing of communities and tackle health inequalities.
IEA - JRF proposals constitute a “costly and unrealistic wish list”14/01/2021 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s report on poverty
The King’s Fund responds to Office for National Statistics deaths data for 202014/01/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund responded to the latest Office for National Statistics data on deaths in England and Wales in 2020
JRF - After a decade of deprivation, we need policies that prioritise recovery for families in poverty14/01/2021 09:35:00
In yesterday’s state of the nation report, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warns that ministers must make tackling poverty an economic priority in 2021 or they risk being defined by a record of worsening hardship.
IEA responds to Chancellor’s economic update12/01/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at the free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s economic statement
IEA - Keir Starmer right to warn against hikes to council tax – but what taxes would he increase instead?12/01/2021 10:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to Sir Keir Starmer’s speech on the economy
Brexit deal leaves workers’ rights and environmental protections at serious risk of erosion, warns IPPR12/01/2021 09:35:00
Despite improving on a ‘no deal’ outcome, agreement leaves wide scope for key rights and duties to be rolled back
The King’s Fund responds to the latest emergency care situational reports and estates data08/01/2021 13:20:00
Siva Anandaciva, Chief Analyst at The King’s Fund, responded to the latest NHS Urgent and Emergency Care Daily Situation Report data and Estates Returns Information Collection
Adam Smith Inst - Vaccination acceleration worth a shot05/01/2021 11:35:00
The COVID-19 pandemic rages on with an average of over 40,000 daily new confirmed cases in the United Kingdom (UK), an all-time high. Over 400 people a day die with the virus, and lockdown measures necessitated by the virus continue to cause further harms. The fastest and safest way out of this crisis, the Adam Smith Institute argues, is mass vaccination.