IFS - Labour plans to raise income tax for 1.6 million people – the highest-income 3% of adults
The Labour Party has announced plans to introduce a 45% income tax rate on annual incomes over £80,000 and a 50% rate on incomes over £125,000 from 2020–21. New analysis by IFS researchers, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, examines the likely effects of this policy.
Key findings include:
- Labour’s plans would raise income tax for 1.6 million people with taxable incomes over £80,000 a year. They are the highest-income 5% of income tax payers, or the highest-income 3% of all adults.
- Losses would be greater, in cash terms, for those with higher incomes. Someone with an annual taxable income of £100,000 would lose £1,000 a year, whereas someone with an income of £150,000 would lose £5,375 a year.
- The proposals would affect ever more people over time, since the £80,000 threshold would be frozen in cash terms. Approximately 1.9 million people will have incomes exceeding £80,000 in 2023–24: the top 6% of income tax payers or the top 4% of adults.
- The top 5% of income tax payers contribute half of all income tax revenues today, up from 43% just before the financial crisis. They receive a quarter of taxpayers’ income – similar to the share they had in 2007–08. The rise in the concentration of income tax at the top in recent years reflects a series of income tax increases for high-income individuals since 2010. These include the introduction of the additional rate (now at 45%), the withdrawal of the personal allowance, cuts in income tax relief for private pension contributions and real-terms reductions in the higher-rate threshold.
- The tax revenue that Labour’s proposals would raise is highly uncertain, and depends on the extent to which people reduce their taxable incomes in response to the rise in income tax. If no one changed their behaviour, the tax rises would raise around £10 billion per year on average between 2020–21 and 2023–24. Given existing evidence, a reasonable central estimate for the revenue raised is around £3 billion per year, but it is also plausible that it could raise up to around £6 billion or cost around £1 billion. All else equal people would respond less to the tax rise if avoidance opportunities are fewer, so it is possible that other measures introduced at the same time would affect the amount it would raise.
Xiaowei Xu, a Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said:
“Labour are proposing a substantial tax rise on the highest-income 3% of adults. This could raise some money – about £3 billion a year as a central estimate – and could have some effect on reducing income inequality. But it comes with risks, as those with the highest incomes are likely to respond to the tax rise by reducing their pre-tax incomes. The likely extent of these responses is highly uncertain, though the more Labour reduces the scope to shift income into more lightly taxed forms (like capital gains), the more revenue its income tax proposal would be likely to raise.
It is worth noting that we are already extraordinarily dependent on this small group of individuals for tax payments – they account for half of income tax revenues today. Perhaps contrary to popular belief, this group has seen the biggest tax rises over the last decade. Countries that raise more tax than us tend to have much higher taxes on people on average incomes, and not just rely on the highest income individuals for tax revenues.”
Latest News from
National League should suspend the season “with immediate effect”, says IEA expert21/01/2021 10:35:00
Statement by Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free-market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs
BBC licence fee is “anachronistic and in dire need of reform”, says IEA expert21/01/2021 09:35:00
IEA responds to NAO report on the BBC licence fee
Hiking corporation tax would be ‘illogical and counterproductive”, says IEA expert19/01/2021 11:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to reports that the Chancellor Rishi Sunak is considering raising corporation tax
IPPR - UK risks EU retaliation if workers’ rights are rolled back19/01/2021 10:35:00
IPPR trade and EU relations expert says leaked proposal to cut working time protections would also be damaging and deeply unpopular
Any extension of the Universal Credit uplift should not be made permanent, says IEA expert19/01/2021 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to calls to extend the £20 a week Universal Credit uplift
King's Fund - Boost for local health partnerships as six areas secure place on £3 million grant-funding programme14/01/2021 12:35:00
Six areas in England have been chosen to join the first phase of a major grant-funding and development programme designed to improve the health and wellbeing of communities and tackle health inequalities.
IEA - JRF proposals constitute a “costly and unrealistic wish list”14/01/2021 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s report on poverty
The King’s Fund responds to Office for National Statistics deaths data for 202014/01/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund responded to the latest Office for National Statistics data on deaths in England and Wales in 2020
JRF - After a decade of deprivation, we need policies that prioritise recovery for families in poverty14/01/2021 09:35:00
In yesterday’s state of the nation report, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warns that ministers must make tackling poverty an economic priority in 2021 or they risk being defined by a record of worsening hardship.