IFS - Parties’ minimum wage plans would double or treble number of private sector employees whose wages are directly set from Whitehall
The share of employees directly affected by the minimum wage would double under Conservatives’ plans and treble under Labour’s according to new research published by IFS.
Conservative plans to raise the National Living Wage to two thirds of the median by 2024, and extend it to 21- to 24-year-olds, would bring one in six employees within scope, increasing the numbers affected by 2½ million (from 1.9 million today).
Labour plans to introduce a £10 minimum for all aged 16 and over would mean more than a quarter of all employees’ wages being directly set by the minimum, with an additional 4.6 million employees aged 21 and over directly affected, taking the total to 6½ million.
Because the lowest wages tend to be found in the private sector, the impact here will be even greater. Labour’s policy would mean nearly 30% of private sector employees’ wages would be set directly from Whitehall, while Conservative policy would set 20% of private sector wages.
Low-wage regions would also be more affected. Around 30% of employees in the North East, North West, Yorkshire and the Humber, East and West Midlands, and Wales would be on the minimum wage under Labour’s plans.
The National Living Wage (NLW) currently applies to employees aged 25 and over and stands at £8.21 an hour. It's set to rise to around £8.53 in 2020 and £9.68 in 2024 under current policy. The Conservatives have pledged to extend the NLW to 21- to 24-year-olds and raise it to two thirds of median hourly wages, to around £10.39, by 2024. Labour plans to introduce a £10 minimum wage in 2020 for all employees aged 16 and over.
Other findings include:
- Both parties’ plans would take the minimum wage to a historical high and give the UK one of the highest minimum wages among developed countries.
- Among employees aged 21 and over, Labour’s plans would mean minimum wages would directly affect one third of women, nearly half of part-time employees and two-thirds of those working in hospitality.
- The Conservatives’ plans would see the share of 21- to 24-year-old employees affected by the minimum wage rise from 9% today to 36% by 2024.
- Under Labour policy, 49% of employees aged 21–24, 82% of those aged 18–20 and 94% of those aged 16–17 would be affected by the minimum wage. There are particular risks to having very high minimum wages for young employees, many of whom may struggle to find employment at those wages.
- The direct benefits from minimum wage increases would mostly go to middle-income households. Only 17% of minimum-wage workers today live in the poorest fifth of households and only 19% are in households in relative income poverty, partly because low-paid workers often live with higher earners. Many of those who do live in low-income households would see part of their gains clawed back through reduced benefit entitlements.
The evidence suggests that minimum wage rises so far have been a success in that they have substantially boosted earnings without harming employment. There may therefore be a case for further rises as part of a strategy to tackle low pay. But a careful process is required for implementing those rises. There will be some level beyond which a higher minimum wage will harm the employment prospects of the low-paid. Previous evidence suggests we have not got there yet, but it does not tell us where the tipping point is. The risk of sudden large jumps in the minimum wage is that the tipping point is passed before the evidence comes in, leaving policymakers unable to respond in time to limit the damage.
Xiaowei Xu, a Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said:
"Recent minimum wage rises have boosted earnings and there is little evidence that they have damaged employment, so there may well be scope for further increases. But both the Conservatives’ and Labour’s plans would take us into uncharted waters. That calls for a careful and incremental process to ensure that, if the employment prospects of the low-paid do start to be impacted, policymakers can change course before it is too late.
"We should not be setting minimum wages via a political bidding war. If due consideration is not given to the balancing act involved, the risks to the very people the policy is intended to help may be quite severe."
Latest News from
NIESR: Boosting digital infrastructure will help close regional gaps05/12/2019 14:20:00
Significant investment in digital infrastructure to increase the coverage of ultrafast and full fibre internet for everyone in the UK may help to reduce regional disparities as the access is unevenly distributed across the country, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
NIESR: Productivity improvement needed to raise living standards05/12/2019 10:20:00
The next government must follow a robust, methodical and wide-ranging approach to kickstart a recovery in productivity growth in order to mend the “slow puncture” in UK economic growth, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
Researchers need to work harder to combat misinformation online, says Demos04/12/2019 14:20:00
A new report from Demos looking into how research and development is discussed and communicated about online shows the need for researchers to work harder to be a bigger part of the online conversation, in order to combat the rise of misinformation.
IEA: Evidence so far suggests minimum pricing in Scotland has been “an expensive flop”04/12/2019 13:15:00
Head of Lifestyle Economics at the Institute of Economic Affairs Christopher Snowdon commented on new evidence from the Office for National Statistics showing that the number of alcohol-related deaths fell in England by 145, fell in Wales by 13 and rose in Scotland by 16
Manifesto Promises: CSJ reports03/12/2019 11:35:00
Election manifestos provide an important reality check for organisations like the Centre for Social Justice. It is a clear indication, in black and white, as to whether government is listening to us and whether we are having an impact.
The King's Fund comments on new GP workforce figures and NHS vacancy data03/12/2019 10:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund commented on new GP workforce figures and NHS vacancy data from NHS Digital
Policy Exchange - Time to plant – and harvest – more trees03/12/2019 09:35:00
All political parties agree that the UK needs more trees, but stimulating markets to support forestry and supporting sustainable wood use also needs to be part of land policy after Brexit, argues a new paper from Policy Exchange’s award-winning Energy and Environment unit.
NIESR: Tough lessons for new government on raising education standards28/11/2019 11:25:00
The incoming government must embark on a wholesale reform of the education from nursery schools through to adult education to help close gaps between the UK and other comparable economies, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Social and Economic Research.
NIESR: Hiking minimum wage too fast may undermine policy’s success27/11/2019 11:20:00
Raising minimum wage levels too quickly risks undermining the strong consensus between employers, workers and political parties that has been built up during the past two decades, especially if the increases lead to falls in employment that are difficult to reverse, according to an election briefing by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR).