IFS - The government’s proposals for the reform of business rates retention need further work
Ahead of a proposed move from 50% to 75% business rates retention in April 2020, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government is seeking views on its proposals for the reform of certain elements of the business rates retention system in England. IFS researchers Neil Amin-Smith and David Phillips have submitted evidence.
Much of what is proposed is welcome. In particular:
- The proposed adoption of ‘phased’ resets of redistribution rather than ‘fixed’ resets would provide councils with consistent incentives to promote growth in their business rates bases each year and remove the ‘cliff edge’ in previous proposals;
- The consultation also offers councils the opportunity to change how revenues are split between upper and lower-tier councils. This could provide an opportunity to increase the extent to which county councils (which fund social care) benefit from business rates growth. Doing so could help to minimise funding risk and divergences between councils;
- The consultation recognises that valuation changes (‘appeals’) currently constitute a big financial risk over which councils have no control. The proposed solution should, in principle, help to mitigate this risk.
- The consultation’s description of how proposals to protect councils from the risk of valuation changes will function is confusing, imprecise, and appears to be internally inconsistent. For example, the consultation says that the proposal will result in a one year lag before councils see business rates growth reflected in their income, but the mechanism set out would result in a two year lag. For such a major reform such issues are disappointing, especially given recent concerns about the operation of and complexity of the BRRS (as set out in the Hudson Review).
- Many of the key questions posed by the consultation can only really be answered if empirical analysis of the impact of possible options is made available. Such analysis has not yet been provided.
David Phillips, Associate Director at the IFS, said:
“Much of what is in this consultation is sensible and welcome, such as proposals to reduce the risk to councils’ funding arising from business property valuation errors. However, as the Hudson review concluded this is a very complex area where clarity and accuracy from the government are vital. The issues with this consultation suggest that MHCLG still has some way to go on this front.”
Latest News from
IFG - Costs of creating a new government department revealed19/11/2019 16:35:00
The incoming – or returning – prime minister may want to stamp his or her authority on government by rearranging departments, but new research lays bare the total costs involved in creating new departments.
Public demand “fundamental reform” of UK economy finds new poll for IPPR19/11/2019 15:35:00
IPPR/YouGov poll finds majority across party and Brexit divides in favour of significant changes to how the UK economy is run
The King's Fund responds to the General Medical Council's new report on the wellbeing of doctors19/11/2019 14:35:00
Suzie Bailey, Director of Leadership and Organisational Development at The King’s Fund, commented on a new report on the wellbeing of doctors commissioned by the General Medical Council
Civitas - The truth about social mobility in Britain today19/11/2019 13:35:00
False claims about social mobility risk demotivating youngsters from poorer backgrounds and are leading to damaging policies to rectify problems that do not exist, a new Civitas report shows.
The Adam Smith Institute responds to the annual CBI conference19/11/2019 12:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute has responded to speeches at the CBI’s annual conference.
IEA: Conservatives and Labour “dodge big questions” on business reform19/11/2019 11:35:00
IEA Economics Fellow Julian Jessop responded to Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn’s speeches to the Confederation of British Industry
IFS - Parties’ minimum wage plans would double or treble number of private sector employees whose wages are directly set from Whitehall19/11/2019 10:35:00
The share of employees directly affected by the minimum wage would double under Conservatives’ plans and treble under Labour’s according to new research published by IFS.
Universal Credit has helped take benefit payments to their lowest since 1948, finds IPPR19/11/2019 09:35:00
New system needs fundamental reform to make it a ‘safety net, not a tightrope’, says new think tank report
The King's Fund responds to new reports on mortality trends in the UK19/11/2019 08:35:00
Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund, responded to new reports from The Health Foundation and London School of Economics on mortality trends in the UK