IFS - Using the Barnett Formula to allocate replacement funding for EU schemes could cost Wales dear
The Welsh Assembly’s Finance Committee has begun taking oral evidence in its inquiry on preparations for the replacement of EU funding programmes after Brexit.
IFS researchers Nicolo Bird and David Phillips recently submitted written evidence to the inquiry, focusing on the options and issues for the allocation of funding to different parts of the UK and different projects.
One option they examine is rolling the replacement funding into the block grant the Welsh and other devolved governments receive from Westminster and using the Barnett formula to update it each year – an approach the Scottish Parliament asked about in its own recent consultation.
The rural nature of much of Wales, and low GDP per capita of West Wales and the Valleys (the poorest region of the UK), mean that Wales currently receives more funding for agriculture and especially economic development than England: around 3.5 times as much per person in total.
But using the Barnett formula to update funding levels post-Brexit would mean increasing funding each year by the same cash amount per person as in England. This would be a much smaller percentage increase than in England given Wales’ initial higher levels of spending. And after accounting for inflation, it would represent a real-terms decrease unless funding in England were rising very rapidly.
This ‘Barnett squeeze’ would take place irrespective of what was happening to funding needs in Wales compared to England. Nicolo and David argue that because it takes no account of funding needs or outcomes achieved from funding, the Barnett Formula would therefore be unsuitable for allocating funding designed to replace current EU schemes.
Wales could also lose out if the new funding schemes do not replicate a peculiar feature of the existing EU schemes: areas with GDP per capita of less than 75% of the EU average are entitled to much more funding per person than areas with 75% or above. There is not a clear rationale for this funding ‘cliff edge’ but removing it could see substantial cuts to development funding for the poorest regions that qualify for the highest level of support currently – including West Wales and the Valleys. It is therefore important to prepare for how these regions could adapt to funding cuts.
David Phillips, Associate Director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies said:
"Big choices loom on how much to spend on programmes to replace the EU's agriculture, regional development and research innovation funding after 2020, and how that spending should be allocated and managed.
Wales currently benefits from much higher levels of funding per person than in England, but new arrangements post Brexit could narrow this gap, pushing down funding, especially in West Wales and the Valleys."
Latest News from
IFS - School spending per pupil in 2024 to remain 3% below 2010 levels in real-terms once you account for actual costs faced by schools02/08/2022 15:20:00
Between 2009-10 and 2019-20, we estimate that school spending per pupil in England fell by 9% in real-terms. In the 2019 and 2021 Spending Review, the government allocated extra funding to schools and explicitly stated that this would restore spending per pupil to 2010 levels in real-terms by the end of the parliament in 2024-25. Unexpectedly high cost pressures on schools mean that the government is no longer on track to deliver on this objective.
“Junk science”: IEA expert rubbishes claim TfL ‘junk food’ ad ban prevented almost 100,000 obesity cases02/08/2022 14:20:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responds to a study published in the International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity claiming that Transport for London’s ban on ‘junk food’ advertising may have prevented 100,000 cases of obesity
IEA - Raise interest rates to 1.75 per cent immediately, votes Shadow Monetary Policy Committee02/08/2022 13:20:00
During the July 2022 Shadow MPC meeting, the key area of debate concerned the scale of the rise in Bank rate.
IFS - 110,000 workers missing from work as a result of long COVID at a cost of £1.5 billion a year in lost earnings27/07/2022 13:25:00
The number of people with long COVID (defined as reporting symptoms more than four weeks after infection) has been on the rise – with the latest ONS figures showing that there were almost 2 million people with the condition as of May 2022, around double the number a year before.
IPPR - Over £3 billion in unspent apprenticeship levy lost to Treasury ‘black hole’ new data reveal27/07/2022 12:25:00
Apprenticeships experts warn that the Treasury must be more transparent on how it spends the billions returned to its coffers
IEA - Save families £9,000 a year by cutting red tape in housing, childcare, and energy27/07/2022 11:25:00
The next Prime Minister should focus on radical supply-side reform over handouts to dramatically reduce the cost of living.
IPPR - Leading think tank: "Levelling up was business as usual, but that has to change”26/07/2022 12:25:00
As levelling up turns three, new analysis reveals that public spending is lower in the North than England wide despite the agenda
The Bank of England must raise interest rates next month, urges IEA economist21/07/2022 10:25:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest ONS inflation data