IFS - Using the Barnett Formula to allocate replacement funding for EU schemes could cost Wales dear
The Welsh Assembly’s Finance Committee has begun taking oral evidence in its inquiry on preparations for the replacement of EU funding programmes after Brexit.
IFS researchers Nicolo Bird and David Phillips recently submitted written evidence to the inquiry, focusing on the options and issues for the allocation of funding to different parts of the UK and different projects.
One option they examine is rolling the replacement funding into the block grant the Welsh and other devolved governments receive from Westminster and using the Barnett formula to update it each year – an approach the Scottish Parliament asked about in its own recent consultation.
The rural nature of much of Wales, and low GDP per capita of West Wales and the Valleys (the poorest region of the UK), mean that Wales currently receives more funding for agriculture and especially economic development than England: around 3.5 times as much per person in total.
But using the Barnett formula to update funding levels post-Brexit would mean increasing funding each year by the same cash amount per person as in England. This would be a much smaller percentage increase than in England given Wales’ initial higher levels of spending. And after accounting for inflation, it would represent a real-terms decrease unless funding in England were rising very rapidly.
This ‘Barnett squeeze’ would take place irrespective of what was happening to funding needs in Wales compared to England. Nicolo and David argue that because it takes no account of funding needs or outcomes achieved from funding, the Barnett Formula would therefore be unsuitable for allocating funding designed to replace current EU schemes.
Wales could also lose out if the new funding schemes do not replicate a peculiar feature of the existing EU schemes: areas with GDP per capita of less than 75% of the EU average are entitled to much more funding per person than areas with 75% or above. There is not a clear rationale for this funding ‘cliff edge’ but removing it could see substantial cuts to development funding for the poorest regions that qualify for the highest level of support currently – including West Wales and the Valleys. It is therefore important to prepare for how these regions could adapt to funding cuts.
David Phillips, Associate Director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies said:
"Big choices loom on how much to spend on programmes to replace the EU's agriculture, regional development and research innovation funding after 2020, and how that spending should be allocated and managed.
Wales currently benefits from much higher levels of funding per person than in England, but new arrangements post Brexit could narrow this gap, pushing down funding, especially in West Wales and the Valleys."
Latest News from
IFS - Higher education enables graduates to move to places with better career prospects – but this leads to brain drain from the North and coastal areas17/09/2021 11:20:00
By age 27, graduates are 10 percentage points more likely to have moved away from the area where they grew up than otherwise similar non-graduates. Graduates who move tend to move to London and other affluent cities and experience large gains in earnings. This suggests that higher education enables people to move to areas that offer better labour market opportunities.
JRF - New Cabinet faces living standards crisis if they go ahead with cut to Universal Credit16/09/2021 15:20:00
JRF responds to House of Commons debate on the planned cut to Universal Credit and Working Tax Credit.
Civitas - Two Tests for UK Trade: Does seamless, tariff-free trade boost exports and does distance matter?16/09/2021 14:20:00
During the UK’s departure from the European Union, debate about UK trade policy was dominated by two assertions:
Inflation could reach 5 per cent by Christmas, says IEA Expert15/09/2021 16:10:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to ONS consumer price inflation figures for August 2021
IEA - Think tank helped ensure UK-EU FTA “against the odds”15/09/2021 14:15:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has reached the final of this year’s Templeton Freedom Award, which celebrates organisations that have made a meaningful impact on the proliferation of free market ideas through education, policy research or media outreach.
JRF - New research highlights ‘shameful’ racial disparities in housing system15/09/2021 09:10:00
Welfare and immigration policies are contributing to sharply unequal access to affordable housing among BAME communities. A new report from the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) analyses the impact of these policies.
IEA - UK ranks 12th amongst 165 jurisdictions in economic freedom14/09/2021 15:20:00
The UK ranks 12th out of 165 countries and territories included in the Economic Freedom of the World: 2021 Annual Report, released today by the Institute of Economic Affairs in conjunction with Canada’s Fraser Institute. Last year, the UK ranked 13th.
Adam Smith Inst - 2.1 Million Vulnerable Unvaccinated14/09/2021 10:05:00
Raft of measures proposed to protect human life and liberty as Covid-19 becomes endemic
Adam Smith Inst - NEW POLL: Brits back freer movement with New Zealand14/09/2021 09:05:00
A new poll from the Adam Smith Institute and C|T Group RSR confirms that Brits are eager to strike a trade deal with New Zealand which includes freer movement and mutual recognition of qualifications.
IFS - NHS funding boost should be enough to meet pressures over the next two years, but not in the medium term13/09/2021 14:20:00
Last Tuesday the Prime Minister announced a new funding settlement for health and social care in England. This included an additional £6.6 billion for NHS England in 2022−23 and £3.6 billion in 2023−24, on top of pre-pandemic plans, in the face of ongoing pressures from the COVID-19 pandemic.