IFS - Young people increasingly concentrated in low-paid occupations, and young men increasingly struggling to progress – even before COVID-19
Recent generations have increasingly been starting their careers in low-paid occupations such as bar staff, waiters, call centre workers and kitchen assistants, despite higher education levels.
As a result, young people have increasingly been relying on rapid progression from their initial jobs in order for their wages to catch up. The speed of progression has actually been rising for much of recent history. But for men born since 1985, the speed of job progression has slowed down as well – compounding, rather than offsetting, the increased tendency to start out in low-paid occupations. This all refers to trends visible before the impacts of the COVID-19 crisis.
These are among the conclusions of new research at IFS funded by the Alan Turing Institute. Key findings include:
- Men born in each decade since the 1950s, and women born since 1985, started their careers in occupations further down the wage ladder than their predecessors. For example, if we compare people born in the 1970s and the late 1980s: the younger generation of men were at least twice as likely to have been bar staff, kitchen and catering assistants or call centre workers in their first full-time job; and the younger generation of women were about twice as likely to have been waitresses or care workers.
- The increased concentration of young women in low-paying occupations at the start of their careers is a sharp reversal from the trend seen over previous decades. The starting position on the occupational ladder of women born in the late 1980s looked more similar to that of women born in the 1960s than to women born just slightly before them in the early 1980s. For men, the shift has been more gradual but has been going on for much longer.
- Men born since 1985 have not only started lower down the occupational ladder than their predecessors, but also climbed it more slowly thereafter. This slowdown in the rate of early-career progression marks another unhappy reversal. In general, rates of progression up the occupational ladder had been increasing in recent decades – and young men had been increasingly relying on rapid progression in order to ‘catch up’ after increasingly starting out at the bottom of the jobs ladder.
Robert Joyce, an author of the briefing note and a Deputy Director at IFS, said:
‘The overall mix of jobs in the UK has changed radically over the last four decades, with highly-skilled occupations much more prevalent in the modern service-based economy than in the past. But, despite rising education levels, the starting occupations of young people have defied this trend. They have increasingly been concentrated on the bottom rungs of the occupational ladder. For young men, this shift has been occurring for a few decades. For young women, it represents a sharp reversal for women born since 1985.'
‘Compounding this, we also find some support for the perception that there are increasing barriers to job progression. The speed of occupational progression in the early-career years has slowed down for recent cohorts of young men (though not yet for women). Hence, compared with their predecessors, they not only started lower down the jobs ladder but also climbed it more slowly thereafter.'
‘These are all trends we see before the COVID-19 pandemic hit. But they help shape the impacts of that pandemic: the increased concentration of young people in hospitality, for example, has made them more vulnerable to the economic effects of social distancing. And, in turn, the pandemic threatens to exacerbate some of the concerning trends. Job progression is likely to be much harder in an uncertain economic environment with reduced hiring.’
Briefing note: What has been happening to career progression?
Latest News from
IEA expert comments on “likely government intervention” in carbon trading system18/05/2021 12:35:00
Professor Philip Booth, Senior Academic Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented, following warnings that the new UK carbon trading system could lead to “government intervention”
IEA - “Not out of the woods yet”: IEA expert responds to latest ONS employment data18/05/2021 11:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Felllow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to today’s employment data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
The King's Fund responds to the Health and Social Care Committee’s report into the government’s proposals for the reform of health and social care18/05/2021 10:35:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, responded to the Health and Social Care Committee’s report into the government’s proposals for the reform of health and social care
Privatisation of Channel 4 is long overdue, says IEA expert18/05/2021 09:35:00
Professor Philip Booth, Senior Academic Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden MP’s suggestion that Channel 4 could be privatised in less than three years
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow