IPPR - ‘Levelling up’ to be levelled down, with £ half a billion lost to inflation
IPPR North responds to the Autumn Statement
The leading think tank for the north of England, IPPR North, has calculated that £1 in every £13 allocated through key ‘levelling up’ pots of money - the Levelling Up and Shared Prosperity Funds - will be lost to inflation.
The chancellor’s move not to ”inflation-proof” levelling up funding, means that £560 million will be lost from these two key levelling up pots:
- £223 million will be lost from the Shared Prosperity Fund, the government's replacement for EU structural funds over the next three years.
- £340 million will be lost from the Levelling Up Fund, named after the government’s flagship agenda, over the same period.
Researchers have also warned that delays in delivering funding are, and will, further add to the levelling up money lost to inflation. But the director of the think tank, Zoë Billingham explains that levelling down is not inevitable.
Zoë Billingham, director of IPPR North commented:
“This autumn statement leans on local government to raise council tax, just as people are suffering from the soaring cost of living, double digit inflation and stagnant economic growth. This is the wrong call.
“Progress on agreeing devolution deals around the country is welcome, as is the decision to effectively scrap investment zones, as IPPR North has called for, and replace them with university led clusters.
“Overall, the government is showing an ever-weakening grip on levelling up the country. Investing in and growing our regions is how we grow the UK economy. Northern Powerhouse Rail in skeleton form and levelling up funding eroded by high inflation won’t cut it.”
Marcus Johns, a research fellow at IPPR North who carried out this analysis added:
“Resilience has been sucked out of local authorities, disproportionately in the North, over the last twelve years and the impacts of this continue to mount. Local authorities and public services face surging costs and are being pushed to the brink, at a critical time when the economic outlook suggests a deep drop in people’s disposable income and increasing hardship.
“People across the country will pay more for less, and inequalities will widen between places as councils with pricier properties will be able to raise more than other areas – like many in the North – because of the chancellor’s decision not to support councils with surging inflation, but instead to raise council tax limits. Of course, improving local authorities’ flexibility to fund services and investment would generally be positive, but specifically raising council tax limits without any other support means less well-off places will be more exposed to inflation than the wealthiest places”.
Jack Shaw, who also carried out this analysis and is based in IPPR, said:
“The autumn statement was an opportunity for the chancellor to put tackling inequality at the centre of the government’s agenda, but the rhetoric hasn’t matched the reality.
“The government’s failure to inflation-proof levelling up funding will have a direct impact on local communities as infrastructure projects will have to be scrapped, delayed or scaled back. That means fewer jobs and less growth as a recession looms”.
Latest News from
IEA - Return of the Online Safety Bill “a crucial opportunity for parliamentarians to reconsider its most problematic elements.”24/11/2022 16:10:00
Matthew Lesh, Head of Public Policy at the free market Institute of Economic Affairs commented on the return of the Online Safety Bill to Parliament
IPPR - New migration stats reveal growing asylum backlog24/11/2022 13:25:00
IPPR’s analysis of today’s quarterly ONS and Home Office migration statistics highlights the following trends
IEA - Militant union strike action “likely to inflict permanent damage on Britain’s railways.”24/11/2022 09:20:00
Professor Len Shackleton, labour market expert at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Rail, Maritime, and Transport Union’s announcement of strike action over the Christmas period
A more open approach to migration could win over swing voters, find IPPR researchers23/11/2022 16:15:00
Half of public positive about immigration, up from one-third in 2014, new analysis reveals
IEA - The Prime Minister’s words are no substitute for bold action to turbocharge innovation22/11/2022 13:20:00
Matthew Lesh, Head of Public Policy at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responds to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s speech at the CBI
IEA - The SNP has fallen down the temperance rabbit hole with its extreme clamp-down on alcohol marketing18/11/2022 10:20:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Scottish government’s consultation on restricting alcohol advertising and promotion
National Audit Office’s (NAO) report on managing NHS backlogs and waiting times in England - The King's Fund responds18/11/2022 09:20:00
Siva Anandaciva, Chief Analyst at The King’s Fund commented on the National Audit Office’s (NAO) report on managing NHS backlogs and waiting times in England
The Adam Smith Institute Responds to the Chancellor's Autumn Statement17/11/2022 16:20:00
Daniel Pryor, Head of Research at the Adam Smith Institute, responded to the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement
JRF - Some relief for families but “obstacle course just to afford the essentials” remains17/11/2022 15:20:00
Rebecca McDonald, Chief Economist for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation responded to the Chancellor’s fiscal statement, which included confirmation that benefits would be uprated in line with inflation