IPPR - No-deal warning: The workers’ rights most at risk from a no-deal Brexit
IPPR think tank finds whilst protections will remain in place on day one of no-deal, government can deregulate and weaken rights subtly over time
Beyond no-deal ‘day one’ the UK government will have considerable scope to repeal or weaken current labour and social standards derived from EU law. A report from the think tank IPPR warns that rather than a brazen act of repeal, hard won rights could instead be weakened gradually over time via secondary legislation.
EU social policy on areas such as working time, holiday pay, health and safety, working conditions, and rights to parental leave amongst many others could be eroded after a no-deal, according to IPPR. This uncertain future is exacerbated by signals from the current government that they wish to diverge on regulations from the EU.
Day one after a no-deal
The UK would no longer be subject to EU law and there would be no transition period, but the passing of the EU Withdrawal Act in 2018 ensures that EU law is converted into UK law – creating a new body of legislation known as ‘retained EU law’.
The report explains that converting some aspects of EU law is incoherent in the domestic setting, particularly where law is linked with EU institutions and activities. To correct this the government has put forward technical statutory instruments, which bar a few exceptions means continuity of labour law on day one.
After no-deal day one
But there are no guarantees that after day one EU labour and social rights will be retained. The report says that without the enforcement powers of EU institutions such as the European Court of Justice, there is considerable scope for the UK government to amend or remove EU retained law.
In order to change retained EU law, the government will need to introduce new legislation. Depending on how the retained EU law is categorised, social and labour rights to a greater or lesser extent at risk.
Least at Risk
Primary legislation such as the Equality Act is most protected from amendments as, unless Henry VIII powers are used, this would require a Bill passing through the House of Commons and the Lords. In a hung Parliament scenario, it is extremely unlikely a bill proposing reductions in labour and social protections could secure a majority.
Secondary legislation originally made under the European Communities Act (ECA) such as working time regulations are more at risk, since amending this legislation generally involves significantly less parliamentary scrutiny than primary legislation. However, there will be less scope for amending these regulations compared to other secondary legislation, because once the European Communities Act is repealed their parent act will have disappeared.
Most at Risk
The area most at risk is secondary legislation made under acts of parliament other than the ECA, because there is greater scope for amending this legislation via powers under their parent acts. Examples of labour legislation falling under this category include the Part-Time Workers Regulations and the Fixed-Term Employees Regulations.
Even if the government does not choose to lower standards, it is possible that the UK will fail to keep pace with EU protections. In recent months the EU has already introduced new directives enhancing workers’ rights – for instance, an annual allowance of 5 working days of carers’ leave – and it is unclear if the UK will adopt them.
The report concludes that the government is unlikely to repeal flagship EU legislation. Instead the government will likely subtly loosen current protections, resulting in the UK’s protections gradually drifting part from the EU model and weakening over time.
Marley Morris, IPPR Associate Director, said:
“A no-deal poses a clear risk to the protection of workers’ rights. While on day one of a no-deal Brexit we would expect the vast majority of workers’ rights deriving from the EU to stay in place, over time there will be much more scope for these rights to be watered down. Rights especially at risk include current protections for part-time and fixed-term workers, because they can be more easily amended by secondary legislation.”
Robin Harvey, Digital and Media Officer, email@example.com
NOTES TO EDITORS
- The IPPR paper, ‘No-deal Brexit: the implications for labour and social rights’ by Marley Morris, was published on Monday 14 October. It is available for download at: http://www.ippr.org/research/publications/ no-deal-brexit-implications-for-labour-and-social-rights
- IPPR is the UK’s pre-eminent progressive think tank. With more than 40 staff in offices in London, Manchester, Newcastle and Edinburgh, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence. www.ippr.org
Latest News from
The West must avoid “politically dangerous” and “economically costly” confrontation with China, says new IEA briefing paper06/08/2020 12:35:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has released a new briefing paper, authored by IEA Head of Education Dr Stephen Davies and Professor Syed Kamall, the IEA’s Academic and Research Director, who sat on the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee from 2005-2019.
Revealed: value of six big-tech firms has soared $1.9 trillion since Covid, as IPPR urges rethink on who owns our digital data06/08/2020 11:35:00
‘Covid effect’ shows why UK needs new digital regulator and action by local authorities to drive common ownership of data and open access
Planning reforms not the 'radical shake-up' some expected, says IEA expert06/08/2020 10:35:00
Dr Kristian Niemietz, Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the government’s planning proposals
IEA - Business rates are a “poorly-designed” tax in need of reform, says Professor Len Shackleton06/08/2020 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, responded to reports that the Chancellor is considering an increase in business rates for the “most valuable properties”
Policy Exchange - Call for evidence: Building hospitals in the post-Covid era04/08/2020 12:35:00
In the context of the government’s plans to build 40 new hospitals, Policy Exchange is launching a call for evidence to inform a major piece of research into how we should build the next generation of hospitals.
Demos - British public support ban on targeted political ads online04/08/2020 11:35:00
New research has found that calls for greater regulation in political campaigns have a far greater consensus of support among the general public than arguments against regulation.
IFG - Public services were not fit to respond to the coronavirus crisis04/08/2020 10:35:00
Failures in planning and funding cuts meant public services were not well prepared to handle the coronavirus crisis, says a new report from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy.
IFS - Geographical inequality in incomes has been falling, but wealth inequalities are rising04/08/2020 09:35:00
The government pledges to ‘level up’ the country and, more recently, the unequal impacts of the COVID-19 crisis have led to an increased focus on inequalities between places as well as between people.