IPPR - Post-Brexit restrictions could block 9 in 10 EU-born construction workers
New IPPR analysis shows that if the UK extended non-EU visa system to EU nationals, just 7% of EU-born construction employees would have been eligible to work in the UK
The construction industry would be severely impacted by ending freedom of movement after Brexit a new report published today by IPPR, the progressive policy think tank. The report shows that industry has become increasingly reliant on EU migrants in order to meet skills and labour shortages.
New IPPR modelling to forecast the potential impact of Brexit shows that construction is exceptionally vulnerable to changes in migration policy. If the migration system for non-EU migrants was replicated, just 7% of current EU-born employees in construction would have been eligible to come here for work. Even in the least-restrictive scenario modelled by IPPR two in three current EU-born employees working in the UK would have been ineligible.
The report shows that growing skills shortages are already constraining the UK’s ability to build. Construction has the joint highest level of skills shortage vacancies of any industry, and two thirds of chartered surveyors say labour shortages are limiting building activity. Despite the skills gaps, employers in construction have failed to train enough workers; the proportion of employers in construction providing training is second lowest of any industry. The construction skills system is dysfunctional, and recent reforms to the apprenticeship system may lead to a decline in construction apprenticeships at a time when we need to see a huge increase.
The report further shows that:
- Productivity has been stagnant in construction; growing at just a fifth the rate of the rest of the economy as a whole 20 years. The industry has failed to embrace modern technology which could boost productivity and the industry accounts for just 0.4% of R&D investment.
- Construction faces a demographic time bomb, with a million workers – two in five of the workforce – set to retire in the next 20 years.
- Construction has become increasingly reliant on EU migrants to plug skills gaps. The proportion of EU migrants in construction increased five-fold between 2003 and 2016.
- The challenge is particularly acute for London where half of construction workers were born outside of the UK with a third born in the EU.
IPPR therefore recommends:
- Government must ensure migration policy works for construction. Given the high level of vulnerability of construction to Brexit, Government should:
- Offer an immediate guarantee of the rights of existing EU nationals to remain and work in the UK to given them confidence and prevent them from leaving the UK.
- Ensure that the construction industry retains access to EU workers for a transitionary period of at least five years to give the industry time to adapt and boost training and productivity.
- Introduce a Trusted Sponsor scheme that allows employers to recruit EU-nationals in exchange for demonstrating good employment practice.
- A new sectoral institution – Construction UK – to drive a collective commitment to skills and productivity in the industry. A social partnership body with representation from employers and employees, Construction UK should design training content and forecast skills demand by publishing a National Construction Pipeline.
- As part of the construction ‘sector deal’, announced on Monday Government should set out anational mission to become a world leader in Modern Methods of Construction, with an ambitious 50/50 target, of at least 50% of homes built by 2022 to have at least 50% of their value from off-site manufacturing.
- A skills strategy for construction: As part of the wider industrial strategy, Government and the industry must work together to transform the construction skills system. This should include a new Construction Productivity and Skills Levy to drive up employer investment, an apprenticeship target of 5% on all government construction contracts, and a Construction Institute of Technology based in London.
Joe Dromey, IPPR Senior Research Fellow:
“Brexit threatens to turn the growing skills challenge in the construction industry into an existential crisis, with significant negative consequences for our economy and for the housing crisis.
“The Government wants to double house building, and cut net migration by more than half. To do either would be difficult. But to do both together – when our construction industry has become increasingly reliant on EU-born workers – is simply not possible.”
“If we are to build the homes, the commercial property and in the infrastructure that our country needs after Brexit, then government needs to wake up, recognise the scale of the threat, and work with the industry to limit the impact.”
Jules Pipe, Deputy Mayor for Planning, Regeneration and Skills, said:
“I welcome the findings of this excellent report which highlights just how severe the impact of a hard Brexit will be on the construction industry.
“More than 100,000 of the capital’s construction workforce are from the European Union and although we are working hard to train up more Londoners, it is impossible to escape the fact that ending freedom of movement would have a crippling effect on our plans to build the homes Londoners so desperately need.
“This is exactly why the Mayor and I continue to argue that qualified freedom of movement of people is the best way to protect economic prosperity in London and the UK in the aftermath of Brexit – and that the Government must provide a cast-iron guarantee that EU nationals in the UK can stay here long term. In addition, just last week, the Mayor published for consultation our Skills and Adult Education Strategy that aims to ensure every Londoner has access to the training they need.”
Sofie Jenkinson, 07981023031, firstname.lastname@example.org
The new IPPR report is available at: Building Britain's Future? The construction workforce after Brexit
IPPR aims to influence policy in the present and reinvent progressive politics in the future, and is dedicated to the better country that Britain can be through progressive policy and politics. With nearly 60 staff across four offices throughout the UK, IPPR is Britain’s only national think tank with a truly national presence. Our independent research covers the economy, work, skills, transport, democracy, the environment, education, energy, migration and healthcare among many other areas.
Latest News from
The West must avoid “politically dangerous” and “economically costly” confrontation with China, says new IEA briefing paper06/08/2020 12:35:00
The Institute of Economic Affairs has released a new briefing paper, authored by IEA Head of Education Dr Stephen Davies and Professor Syed Kamall, the IEA’s Academic and Research Director, who sat on the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee from 2005-2019.
Revealed: value of six big-tech firms has soared $1.9 trillion since Covid, as IPPR urges rethink on who owns our digital data06/08/2020 11:35:00
‘Covid effect’ shows why UK needs new digital regulator and action by local authorities to drive common ownership of data and open access
Planning reforms not the 'radical shake-up' some expected, says IEA expert06/08/2020 10:35:00
Dr Kristian Niemietz, Head of Political Economy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the government’s planning proposals
IEA - Business rates are a “poorly-designed” tax in need of reform, says Professor Len Shackleton06/08/2020 09:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, IEA Editorial and Research Fellow, responded to reports that the Chancellor is considering an increase in business rates for the “most valuable properties”
Policy Exchange - Call for evidence: Building hospitals in the post-Covid era04/08/2020 12:35:00
In the context of the government’s plans to build 40 new hospitals, Policy Exchange is launching a call for evidence to inform a major piece of research into how we should build the next generation of hospitals.
Demos - British public support ban on targeted political ads online04/08/2020 11:35:00
New research has found that calls for greater regulation in political campaigns have a far greater consensus of support among the general public than arguments against regulation.
IFG - Public services were not fit to respond to the coronavirus crisis04/08/2020 10:35:00
Failures in planning and funding cuts meant public services were not well prepared to handle the coronavirus crisis, says a new report from the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy.
IFS - Geographical inequality in incomes has been falling, but wealth inequalities are rising04/08/2020 09:35:00
The government pledges to ‘level up’ the country and, more recently, the unequal impacts of the COVID-19 crisis have led to an increased focus on inequalities between places as well as between people.