IPPR proposes emergency brake on free movement as it sets Brexit options for Theresa May
IPPR yesterday (Wednesday) published two papers laying out the options on the economy and migration that Theresa May will now have to grapple with.
Questions on freedom of movement and access to the single market also need to be settled for Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems if they are to provide a credible opposition.
Theresa May has said “there is clearly no mandate for a deal that involves accepting the free movement of people as it has worked hitherto”; meaning that the EU will almost certainly want to restrict the UK’s access to the single market in some way.
On that basis, IPPR argues that of the options available, Theresa May should argue for an emergency brake on migration, triggered whenever EU migration is harming wages in particular occupations, sectors or regions of the UK and, if triggered, would temporarily restrict the number of EU migrants allowed to work in the occupation, sector or community affected.
The most acceptable trade-off for this would be the UK’s membership of the customs union and the single market membership fee.
Tom Kibasi, IPPR Director, said:
“The biggest challenge for Theresa May is correctly judging the right balance between migration policy and access to the single market.
“At IPPR, we think that the best answer is to negotiate a new different emergency brake on free movement, triggered whenever EU migration is harming wages in particular occupations, sectors or regions of the UK and, if triggered, would temporarily restrict the number of EU migrants allowed to work in the occupation, sector or community affected.
“On the single market, it is reasonable to assume that any change to migration policy means changing our access to the single market.
“The first thing to give up is our membership of the customs union. This would not entail giving up free trade with the EU: it would simply mean that we were no longer bound by the trade agreements that the EU has signed between itself and the rest of the world.
“The second price to pay for control over migration should be the fee that we pay into the EU. At IPPR, we believe the politics of the referendum around the fee should not constrain May from making a rational economic choice. In our judgement, it is better to pay a higher fee than to sacrifice access to the single market in tradable goods or in services, which will come at much greater long-term cost.”
The two IPPR reports set out:
On the economy:
We assess the pros and cons of six options for access to the single market, based on the EU’s relationships with a selection of other trading partners, including Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and Brazil. The elements of economic integration we consider include free trade for goods and services, membership of a customs union, and adherence to EU laws relating to our tradeable activity.
Again, we assess the pros and cons for six options, this time on different levels of freedom of movement: visa restrictions, labour market restrictions, partial labour market restrictions, an emergency brake, and freedom of movement for workers compared to the current status quo of full freedom of movement.
Notes to Editors:
1. The papers are available at: ippr.org/publications/a-progressive-brexit/ and ippr.org.uk/publications/where-next-for-free-movement/
2. Summary of economic options:
3. Summary of options on migration policy:
Latest News from
The King's Fund responds to the Government's adult social care White Paper02/12/2021 09:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund commented on the publication of the government’s adult social care reform White Paper, People at the Heart of Care
CMA order for Meta to sell Giphy could undermine digital trade and innovation, says IEA regulation expert01/12/2021 10:10:00
Victoria Hewson, Head of Regulatory Affairs at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the news that Facebook’s parent company, Meta, has been ordered to sell Giphy by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority
JRF responds to extension of Scottish Child Payment30/11/2021 15:15:00
JRF responds to the Scottish Government's plan to double Scottish Child Payment for children under six from April, and all eligible children under 16 by the end of 2022.
New ‘pingdemic’ could cost economy at least £2 billion, says economist30/11/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the planned reintroduction of some Covid measures
IFS - Education spending changes put a major brake on levelling up30/11/2021 10:35:00
The cuts to education spending over the last decade are effectively without precedent in post-war UK history, including a 9% real-terms fall in school spending per pupil and a 14% fall in spending per student in colleges.
Scrap energy price cap to prevent further bailouts, says IEA Analyst26/11/2021 10:35:00
Andy Mayer, Environment, Energy and Infrastructure Analyst at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the £1.7bn taxpayer bailout of Bulb Energy
The King’s Fund responds to the Health and Care Bill workforce vote24/11/2021 16:25:00
Richard Murray, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund, commented on MPs voting against a plan to require the publication of health and care workforce projections
IFS - English universities ranked on their contributions to social mobility – and the least selective post-1992 universities come out on top24/11/2021 12:10:00
Universities are seen as crucial engines of social mobility, and perhaps with good reason. Individuals eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) in year 11 who attended university are almost four times more likely to be amongst the highest 20% of earners at age 30 than those who did not, and around ten times more likely if they attended one of the four most selective universities in the country.