Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
'Inappropriate powers' in Sanctions Bill says Lords Committee
The Constitution Committee today warns that the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill, the first Brexit bill to be scrutinised by the House of Lords, contains inappropriately broad powers for ministers.
- Report: Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL] (HTML)
- Report: Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL] (PDF)
- Select Committee on the Constitution
The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill intends to provide a new, long-term legal basis for ministers to make secondary legislation concerning sanctions, money laundering and terrorist financing. The bill is expected to begin committee stage in the House of Lords on Tuesday 21 November.
The Constitution Committee's scrutiny of the bill includes:
- Ministerial powers – the Bill creates a broad Henry VIII power authorising ministers to make 'sanctions regulations' and allows new forms of sanctions to be created by secondary legislation. The Committee say that it is not appropriate for ministers to have such broad powers.
- Scrutiny – the Committee say that it is essential that the Bill provides sufficient safeguards and parliamentary scrutiny procedures to make the new sanctions powers constitutionally acceptable.
- Legal certainty – individuals subject to sanctions under the Bill have no right to know the reasons for the sanctions until their appeal against them reaches the courts. The Committee say that this prevents them from preparing their case, undermining common law principles and procedural fairness.
- Criminal offences – the Bill allows ministers to create criminal offences punishable by up to 10 years' imprisonment, while also setting the rules on evidence consideration and defence to those offences. The Committee say that they are deeply concerned by this power.
Commenting on the Bill Baroness Taylor of Bolton, Chairman of the Committee said:
"The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill grants unduly broad powers to ministers and establishes sanctions regimes that will be subject to less scrutiny and challenge than those that exist at present.
"The Bill is the first piece of Brexit legislation to be scrutinised by the House of Lords. The Government should not use the transfer of laws from the EU to the UK as an opportunity to increase its own power, reduce scrutiny, or weaken individuals’ rights."
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Over-budget EastEnders project was flawed from the start20/03/2019 15:47:00
BBC underestimated scale and complexity of E20, which will be completed nearly five years late.
Flawed system leaves leaseholders at risk of exploitation by developers, freeholders and managing agents – urgent reform needed19/03/2019 16:25:00
The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee has called for wide ranging reforms to the leasehold system in a report published today.
Four special inquiry committees recommended by the Lords Liaison Committee18/03/2019 16:15:00
The House of Lords Liaison Committee recently (15 March 2019) published its fourth report of the 2017–19 session, in which it recommends to the House four proposals for new special inquiry (formerly ad hoc) committees in 2019–20.
Serious weaknesses in set-up of National Cyber Security Programme18/03/2019 15:42:00
Committee Chair Meg Hillier MP recently (15 March 2019) commented on the National Audit Office report on the National Cyber Security Programme.
New measures needed to drive transparency of local bodies15/03/2019 16:10:00
Central government should set clear expectations and help citizens hold power to account
Bribery Act 2010 “an exemplary piece of legislation”, say Lords Committee15/03/2019 11:25:00
The Select Committee on the Bribery Act 2010 has published its post-legislative scrutiny report, concluding that the Act is exemplary.
Modernisation must see Bank of England 'practice what it preaches'14/03/2019 16:25:00
This is the first time that this Committee has examined the operations of the Bank of England. Our initial engagement has, in some respects, been a glimpse into the past, with ways of working appearing years out of date.
Extend Article 50 and hold indicative votes to find way forward13/03/2019 15:37:00
In an urgent Report following yesterday’s decision to reject the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Deal for the second time, the Committee says that Parliament will need to request an extension to Article 50 to allow sufficient time for the House of Commons to identify a way forward which can provide clarity about the UK’s future relationship with the EU and win a majority.