Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
Inquiry on UK's financial obligations in the event of ‘no deal’ launched
The EU Financial Affairs Sub-Committee launches an inquiry into the UK's financial obligations to the EU in the event of a 'no deal' in Brexit negotiations.
- Call for Evidence ( PDF 85 KB)
- Send a written submission
- Inquiry: Brexit: 'No deal' financial obligations
- Report: Brexit and the EU Budget (HTML)
- Report: Brexit and the EU Budget (PDF)
- EU Financial Affairs Sub-Committee
Based on evidence received, the Committee's report on Brexit and the EU Budget concludes that Article 50 allows the UK to leave the EU "without being liable for outstanding financial obligations under the EU budget and related financial instruments, unless a withdrawal agreement is concluded which resolves this issue."
However, it also warns that the political and economic consequences of doing so would be "profound" and notes that the EU may well demand a financial contribution before agreeing a preferential trading relationship, as well as a transition period.
Giving the increased possibility of a 'no deal' Brexit, the Committee is revisiting the issue of the UK’s financial obligations to the EU, focusing in particular on the possible consequences of the UK deciding not to pay. This involves considering the enforceability of the UK’s financial obligations to the EU, the likely political response from the EU, and the implications for UK organisations that currently receive EU funding.
Focus of the inquiry
The Committee seeks evidence on the following topics in particular:
- What are the different scenarios under a ‘no deal’ Brexit and how could these affect the UK’s financial obligations to the EU?
- What is the status of the UK’s financial obligations to the EU, and the EU’s financial obligations to the UK, in the event of a ‘no deal’ Brexit?
- How do the UK’s financial obligations to the EU in a ‘no deal’ scenario compare to those agreed under the draft financial settlement?
- How have the Article 50 extensions affected the value of the UK’s financial obligations to the EU? How could any further extensions affect this?
- If no agreement is reached with the EU, how would the UK’s financial obligations be legally enforced? Under which court’s jurisdiction could such a case be considered?
- What would the political consequences be of the UK and EU failing to reach an agreement on their mutual financial obligations?
- How would UK organisations currently receiving EU funding be affected in a ‘no deal’ scenario?
Lord Sharkey, Chair of the EU Financial Affairs Sub-Committee, recently said:
"As the prospect of a ‘no deal’ Brexit appears to be increasing by the day, it is vital that there is greater clarity over such a scenario would mean for the UK’s financial obligations to the EU.
"The Committee will consider how questions over the UK’s payment of any obligations could be decided and enforced, as well as what the consequences of any decision to leave the EU without an agreement on a financial settlement.
"We encourage, and welcome, submissions of written evidence from anyone with knowledge of and an interest in these issues."
The deadline for written submissions is 28 August 2019
Latest News from
Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries
European Union Committee publishes its eighteenth treaty report23/01/2020 11:25:00
The European Union Committee has published its sixteenth report on Brexit-related international agreements.
Report published on the Withdrawal Agreement Bill15/01/2020 11:25:00
The Constitution Committee has published a report on the constitutional issues in the Government’s Withdrawal Agreement Bill. The Bill is of the highest constitutional significance, given its intended effect of implementing Brexit.
Brexit: revised Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration report published by Committee10/01/2020 14:25:00
The House of Lords EU Select Committee has today published its report on the revised EU Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration on future UK-EU relations ahead of House Lords consideration of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill, which starts on Monday 13 January.
Public service broadcasters are essential and need to be supported, says Lords Committee06/11/2019 13:20:00
The Communications and Digital Committee warns that public service broadcasters (PSBs) need to be better supported to ensure that they can continue to produce high-quality drama and documentaries which reflect and examine UK culture. In return, the broadcasters need to adapt to ensure that they serve and reflect all audiences.
Implications of Withdrawal Agreement Bill examined06/11/2019 12:20:00
The Constitution Committee publishes an interim report on the constitutional issues in the Government’s Withdrawal Agreement Bill. The bill is of the highest constitutional significance, given its intended effect of implementing a Brexit deal.
NHS property services set up to fail06/11/2019 11:25:00
NHS Property Services Limited has made progress in tackling some of the issues that it inherited when it was set up. However, it has struggled to get its tenants to sign rental agreements for the properties they occupy, and it is unacceptable that 70% of its tenants still do not have rental agreements in place.
Churn and political interference hampering major project delivery, says PACAC report05/11/2019 16:47:00
Political pressures and staff turnover can significantly impact the Government’s ability to successfully deliver major infrastructure projects, finds an interim report published
Court reforms slow to check impact of changes05/11/2019 14:25:00
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has again fallen behind on critical reforms. HMCTS is now 3 years into its ambitious £1.2 billion programme to modernise the courts, which plan to change the way people access justice by digitising paper-based services, moving some types of cases online, introducing virtual hearings, closing courts and centralising customer services.
Committee calls for measures to help avoid next corporate collapse05/11/2019 11:25:00
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee yesterday wrote to Andrea Leadsom (PDF 77 KB), the Secretary of State for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with a series of recommendations on corporate governance, executive pay and bonuses, and audit reform following its recent public evidence sessions examining the collapse of Thomas Cook.