Information Commissioner's Office
International airline fined £500,000 for failing to secure its customers’ personal data
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has fined Cathay Pacific Airways Limited £500,000 for failing to protect the security of its customers’ personal data.
Between October 2014 and May 2018 Cathay Pacific’s computer systems lacked appropriate security measures which led to customers’ personal details being exposed, 111,578 of whom were from the UK, and approximately 9.4 million more worldwide.
The airline’s failure to secure its systems resulted in the unauthorised access to their passengers’ personal details including: names, passport and identity details, dates of birth, postal and email addresses, phone numbers and historical travel information.
Cathay Pacific became aware of suspicious activity in March 2018 when its database was subjected to a brute force attack, where numerous passwords or phrases are submitted with the hope of eventually guessing correctly. The incident led Cathay Pacific to employ a cybersecurity firm, and they subsequently reported the incident to the ICO.
The ICO found Cathay Pacific’s systems were entered via a server connected to the internet and malware was installed to harvest data. A catalogue of errors were found during the ICO’s investigation including: back-up files that were not password protected; unpatched internet-facing servers; use of operating systems that were no longer supported by the developer and inadequate anti-virus protection.
Steve Eckersley, ICO Director of Investigations, said:
“People rightly expect when they provide their personal details to a company, that those details will be kept secure to ensure they are protected from any potential harm or fraud. That simply was not the case here.
“This breach was particularly concerning given the number of basic security inadequacies across Cathay Pacific’s system, which gave easy access to the hackers. The multiple serious deficiencies we found fell well below the standard expected. At its most basic, the airline failed to satisfy four out of five of the National Cyber Security Centre’s basic Cyber Essentials guidance.
“Under data protection law organisations must have appropriate security measures and robust procedures in place to ensure that any attempt to infiltrate computer systems is made as difficult as possible.”
Strengthened UK and European data protection laws came into force in 2018, however due to the timing of these incidents the ICO investigated this case under the Data Protection Act 1998. The ICO found
the breach to be a serious contravention of Principle 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, which states that appropriate technical and organisational measures must be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data.
In addition to acting promptly in seeking expert assistance from a leading cyber security firm, Cathay Pacific also issued appropriate information to affected individuals and co-operated with the ICO’s investigation.
Full details of the investigation can be found in the Monetary Penalty Notice.
Notes to Editors
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Data Protection (Monetary Penalties) Order 2010, paragraph 18 of the monetary penalty notice is varied as follows:
a) The earliest date of the unauthorised access to Cathay Pacific’s systems was 14 October 2014, not 15 October 2014.
b) The earliest known date of unauthorised access to personal data was 7 February 2015, not 2 July 2015.
- The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK’s independent regulator for data protection and information rights law, upholding information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals.
- The ICO has specific responsibilities set out in the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA2018), the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) and Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (PECR).
- The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a recent data protection law which came into being in the UK from 25 May 2018. Its provisions are included in the Data Protection Act 2018. The Act also includes measures related to wider data protection reforms in areas not covered by the GDPR, such as law enforcement and security. The UK’s decision to leave the EU will not affect the commencement of the GDPR.
- Due to the timing of the incidents in this investigation, a civil monetary penalty has been issued under the previous legislation, the Data Protection Act 1998. The maximum financial penalty in civil cases under former laws is £500,000.
- Under past and current law, the ICO can take action to change the behaviour of organisations and individuals that collect, use and keep personal information. This includes criminal prosecution, non-criminal enforcement and audit.
- Since 25 May 2018, the ICO has the power to impose a civil monetary penalty (CMP) on a data controller of up to £17 million (20m Euro) or 4% of global turnover.
- Any monetary penalty is paid into the Treasury’s Consolidated Fund and is not kept by ICO.
- To report a concern to the ICO go to ico.org.uk/concerns.
Latest News from
Information Commissioner's Office
Blog: Community groups and COVID-19: what you need to know about data protection01/04/2020 09:10:00
Blog posted by: Ian Hulme, Director for Regulatory Assurance at the ICO, 30 March 2020.
Statement in response to the use of mobile phone tracking data to help during the coronavirus crisis30/03/2020 12:25:00
The ICO’s Deputy Commissioner Steve Wood recently responded to the use of mobile phone tracking data to help during the coronavirus crisis.
Blog: Community groups and COVID-19: what you need to know about data protection27/03/2020 13:20:00
A blog by Ian Hulme, Director for Regulatory Assurance at the ICO.
Council employee fined £400 for illegally deleted audio file16/03/2020 10:25:00
A council employee has been fined £400 for an offence under the Freedom of Information (FOI) regulations.
Data protection and coronavirus12/03/2020 15:25:00
We all share the same concerns about the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The need for public bodies and health practitioners to be able to communicate directly with people when dealing with this type of health emergency has never been greater.
Blog: Don’t get caught out when it comes to pupil photos10/03/2020 15:10:00
Blog posted by: Andrew Laing, ICO Head of Data Protection Complaints, 09 March 2020.
Combining privacy and innovation: ICO Sandbox six months on10/03/2020 12:25:00
It’s been an exciting, interesting and challenging first six months for the ICO Sandbox – both for those externally involved in the various projects and for the ICO staff working on the scheme. Ian Hulme discusses the progress so far.
The ICO and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner sign Memorandum of Understanding06/03/2020 12:25:00
James Dipple-Johnstone (Deputy Commissioner) yesterday commented on the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding.