Iran: How to counter covert action in the digital age
The case of Iran shows that countering covert action in the digital age requires transparency, persistence and international cooperation. But also that it is unrealistic to expect states to stop completely.
Governments, military forces and non-state groups use covert action to understand – and influence – what their adversaries and allies are doing. The digital age has created many new opportunities for covert action, but has also made traditional strategies much harder to conceal. Digital capitalism’s thirst for data generates detailed online footprints, whether working, shopping or spying.
In this environment, three key strategies for covert action have evolved. The first is implausible deniability, such as Russia’s ‘little green men’ in Ukraine after 2014 – a course of action forced, in part, by Russian soldiers using geolocated photos and apps on the front line. The second is to use distraction and disinformation, hiding embarrassing or sensitive facts in a forest of false counterclaims. The third is to attempt to shield certain audiences from leaks, imposing censorship to limit domestic impact from international scandal, a strategy more often used by states with authoritarian tendencies.
Countering these changing strategies requires transparency, persistence and international cooperation, as evidenced by the case of Iran.
Click here to continue reading the full version of this Expert Comment on the Chatham House website.
Latest News from
An India–Middle East–Europe corridor is unlikely to boost Saudi–Israel normalization18/09/2023 14:20:00
Israel hopes the corridor announced at the G20 will facilitate normalized relations with Saudi Arabia. Riyadh doesn’t see it that way.
The G20 lives on, but mistrust between the West and China hampers progress12/09/2023 12:20:00
The leaders’ declaration ensures the G20 will survive, but members have to take more risk in trusting each other to deliver what is urgently required.
The G20 showcases India’s growing power. It could also expose the limits of its foreign policy08/09/2023 12:25:00
The summit follows a year of impressive achievements for India. But the event will also display the challenge of maintaining ‘strategic autonomy’.
Whether 1.5°C is ‘alive’ or ‘dead’, a new climate plan will be required07/09/2023 12:20:00
The Paris Agreement target was meant to help avoid future climate impacts that are now arriving.
Making climate an election issue risks undermining the UK’s international role01/09/2023 12:20:00
The views of voters are uncertain, while the damage to UK relations – and the climate – is inevitable.
Pushing Ukraine to negotiate now would be disastrous31/08/2023 12:20:00
More than 500 days after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, there are signs that some of Ukraine’s supporters in the West want to prepare the ground for negotiations. Such a shift in policy would be catastrophic.
Does an expanded BRICS mean anything?29/08/2023 15:10:00
The influence of BRICS will depend on its effectiveness, not on its composition or size.
Symbolism over substance for South Africa as Ramaphosa announces BRICS 3.029/08/2023 12:20:00
Johannesburg delivered a level of drama befitting of the occasion. But beyond the shared desire for reformed global economic governance, it’s unclear how the expanded group will benefit South African citizens.