JRF - End the benefits freeze this year to boost the incomes of working families
The Treasury has been urged to boost the living standards of low-income working families by ending the freeze on benefits and tax credits and increase them in line with inflation at the Spring Statement
Ministers are being warned that a failure to end the freeze this year will increase poverty and make life harder for millions of people.
Almost all families with children would benefit if the Chancellor opted to end the freeze on benefits and tax credits one year early, with the greatest gains going to 3.2 million children living in low-income working families, according to new analysis from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF).
The call comes amidst mounting cross-party demand for the freeze to be ended before the proposed final year kicks in on 8 April 2019. Members of the Work and Pensions Committee, five former Cabinet ministers as well as a large number of backbench MPs all share the view that it would be morally unjustifiable to continue with the policy.
Over the last five years child poverty has been rising and is set to continue to increase in the coming years. The benefits freeze is the single biggest policy driver behind rising poverty in the UK. If the Government was to push ahead with the policy until April 2020, it will have driven 400,000 people into poverty and made life harder for 27 million people – 11 million of whom are children.
Families are already on average £340 a year worse off because of the policy. Continuing the freeze for another year would further squeeze families leaving them on average £560 a year worse off. This is equivalent to around three months of food shopping for an average low-income family.
Ashley, 42, told us:
“Since the benefit freeze, I have been choosing between eating, heating, paying bills or dealing with another essential need or emergency. It's not right that the cost of living continues to increase, while benefits have remained static. It is cruel and unrealistic to expect people to break free of poverty, while doing nothing to make this an achievable outcome.”
Campbell Robb, Chief Executive of the independent Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said:
“As a society, we are failing in our duty to do everything we can to protect each other from poverty. Social security is meant to be a public service we can all rely on in hard times however, that support is being eroded. There is a growing consensus across the political parties that continuing the benefits freeze would be morally unjustifiable.
“Ministers have indicated that they do not think the freeze should be extended beyond 2020. But families are being driven into poverty now and cannot wait another year for action. The upcoming Spring Statement is an opportunity for the Government to end the freeze to help 200,000 people break free from poverty.
“The Chancellor must seize this opportunity to right the wrong of more and more families being swept into poverty. The risks of the current uncertain economic outlook should not be borne by those who have the least protection. Ending the freeze could redress that balance – and help working families to stay afloat.”
The latest analysis also found:
- 200 000 people have already been pushed into poverty by the first three years of the freeze, around half of them children.
- In real terms, the support that people receive in 2019 will be worth 6.5% less than it would have been if it had risen with inflation, as would normally be the case.
- More than nine in ten single parent families and more than eight out of ten couple parent families would see their incomes rise if the freeze was ended.
JRF is calling on the Government to end the freeze on benefits and tax credits and increase them in line with inflation at the Spring Statement. Ending the freeze one year early would enable 200,000 people to break free from poverty. The cost of ending the freeze in 2019 would be £1.4 billion. This is substantially less than the £2.79 billion cost in 2019/20 of raising the income tax personal allowance and higher rate threshold - £5 in £6 of which goes to the richest half of the country.
Latest News from
IFS - Taking control: which taxes could be devolved to English local government?21/03/2019 10:35:00
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the question of whether additional taxes should be devolved to English local government:
Policy Exchange - The Speaker should allow a third meaningful vote on the Brexit deal21/03/2019 09:35:00
By Sir Stephen Laws QC, Senior Fellow at Policy Exchange, and former First Parliamentary Counsel from 2006-12
NIESR Monthly Wage Tracker: Pay growth appears to be stabilising at around 3½% per annum20/03/2019 13:38:00
Pay growth appears to be stabilising at around 3½ per cent per annum.
IPPR - Calls for a ‘Just Transition Commission’ to Kick Start North’s Low Carbon Revolution19/03/2019 13:35:00
A body to ensure that energy workers in the north of England are able to make the most of a “clean energy revolution” should be established as soon as possible, according to a leading think-tank.
War on offshore financial centres undermines competition & tramples on rights to privacy, IEA report says19/03/2019 12:35:00
IEA release report on offshore financial centres
'A hidden crisis in hospitals up and down the country' - The King's Fund responds to NHS combined performance data19/03/2019 11:35:00
Deborah Ward, Senior Analyst at The King’s Fund, commented on recent monthly NHS performance figures
Patchwork safety net of food banks, fuel banks and other essential services struggling to meet needs of poorest, says IPPR19/03/2019 10:35:00
Essential service providers could be better coordinated to meet the demand created by welfare cuts and the universal credit rollout
IEA - Christopher Snowdon responds to new consultation on junk food19/03/2019 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to new consultation on junk food
Adam Smith Inst - Half marks for tariff reductions14/03/2019 11:35:00
While the government's 'modest liberalisation of tariffs' (in their words) is a step in the right direction for consumers and producers, but in bowing to the agricultural lobby the government would penalise Brits that dare to buy food from overseas.