JRF - Places on the brink: the parts of Britain at risk of surging poverty
New research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) for the first time identifies the parts of Britain which are likely to find it hardest to recover from the economic impact of Coronavirus.
The charity is warning that there is no one-size-fits-all recovery and urges the Government to take targeted action that pulls these places back from the brink of surging levels of poverty.
As the UK Government makes decisions which will define our country for years to come, JRF is calling for Whitehall to work with devolved and local governments to prevent rising unemployment pushing millions into poverty. Ministers must seize this opportunity to do much more to target bold investment in support, skills and retraining at those most at risk of unemployment.
The analysis maps out the British towns and cities which are projected to see the greatest increases in unemployment by the end of this year while at the same time experiencing the weakest flow of new job vacancies.
|Ranking||Local Authority||Potential Peak Unemployment Rate||Current Number Of People Out Of Work Per Vacancy|
|2||Barking and Dagenham||18%||49|
|14||Kingston upon Hull, City of||17%||26|
The data highlights that certain Outer London boroughs, significant parts of the West Midlands and pockets in the North-East and North-West are at greatest risk of bearing the full force of the surge in unemployment and poverty making it harder to recover.
Not every area has been affected equally by the economic consequences of COVID-19. Many places hit hardest are those that went into the health crisis with the weakest economies. This includes many seaside towns and many towns and cities of the ‘red wall turned blue’ seats that helped deliver the Conservatives’ election win last year.
Many of these places have a high share of jobs in hard hit sectors, such as tourism and manufacturing jobs which are now at high risk and are also likely to have been affected by falling local spending.
There are also a second set of places that may find it hardest to recover from COVID-19 where local economies and job opportunities were fairly strong before the pandemic, notably places in our biggest cities and particularly Outer London Boroughs such as Haringey and Barking and Dagenham. These densely populated areas have been strongly affected by social distancing requirements and have a relatively large share of jobs in local services such as retail, hospitality, arts and recreation.
In these areas, there are currently a very large number of people competing over each local job. Recovery may be helped by the fact that people in cities have the option to commute to nearby areas and our cities may prove to be more resilient economies, but we should not take it for granted.
Therefore, devising a one-size-fits-all strategy at a national level will not be effective at overcoming place-specific challenges. The Government has taken unprecedented steps to protect the economy during lockdown, now is not the time to lose momentum
Dave Innes, Head of Economics at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said:
“It can only be right that the places hardest hit by the ongoing economic crisis are the first priority of the recovery. Towns and cities which are already on the brink need urgent support to prevent a surge in poverty caused by rising unemployment.
“There is no one-size-fits-all recovery and many parts of Britain can’t afford the price of inaction. The Government has the chance to provide the skills and opportunities each part of our country needs to thrive if it targets investment where it is needed most.”
JRF is calling for the Government to deliver a ‘good jobs’ recovery, that lives up to the ambitious promises they made at the last election to level up the country. As a first step towards this, ministers need to:
- Bring forward investments in targeted support, skills, and retraining schemes, to benefit the groups of workers in sectors most at risk of job losses. This should particularly focus on:
- Adults over 25 with fewer formal qualifications
- BAME communities
- Go further on its job creation programmes so that they better reflect the scale of risk facing many groups of workers.
- Ensure the much-promised Shared Prosperity Fund provides additional targeted support to boost employment and opportunity in our weakest economies.
Latest News from
10pm closing time “from a random policy generator” says IEA expert22/09/2020 12:35:00
Christopher Snowdon responds to latest coronavirus measures
Every two weeks of lockdown could cost the UK at least £8 billion in lost output, says IEA expert22/09/2020 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, IEA Economics Fellow, commented on the potential economic impact of a second national lockdown
Adam Smith Inst - The state of the (student) unions22/09/2020 10:35:00
The report, from the free market Adam Smith Institute, argues that student unions are perceived as ineffective by students, lack democratic legitimacy, and undermine freedom of association and expression. Extraordinarily, it finds that student unions that receive higher block grants from universities tend to be poorer performing in the National Student Survey.
IFS - Larger funding cuts for schools in poor areas leave them badly placed to deal with COVID-19 challenges22/09/2020 09:35:00
Schools serving more deprived pupils face major challenges over the next few years. Educational inequalities will have widened during lockdown. Planned increases in teacher starting salaries will also weigh more heavily on such schools, given they are more likely to employ new teachers.
IFG - Disputes over Brexit increase the need to strengthen the Sewel convention17/09/2020 10:35:00
A new Institute for Government paper says the future of the Union could be put at risk without reforms to the principle of legislative consent which lies at the heart of the devolution settlement.
IFS - Large variation in earnings returns among postgraduate degrees, with returns of more than 15% for masters in business and law, but negative returns for many arts and humanities courses17/09/2020 09:35:00
Women with a masters degree earn considerably more at age 35 than those with only an undergraduate degree, with average earnings of £35,400, compared with £32,500 for those who do not go beyond undergraduate level. For men, the differences are even larger: masters graduates earn £55,800 on average, £5,000 more than those with only an undergraduate degree.
IFS - The long shadow of deprivation: Differences in opportunities across England15/09/2020 15:20:00
A socially mobile country provides equal opportunities for everyone, across big cities and small towns, and regardless of whether your parents are rich or poor. This report makes use of newly linked administrative data on all state-educated pupils born between 1986 and 1988 to follow a group of sons from where they grew up, looking at their family circumstances and their educational achievement, through to the labour market.
IPPR welcomes furlough reform plan proposed by Labour at TUC Conference15/09/2020 14:20:00
The think tank had previously called for such a scheme to prevent mass unemployment by encouraging part-time working