King's Fund - Government should do more to improve the public’s health
The government should look beyond the NHS and focus on a range of policies to improve the public’s health, including making effective use of tax and regulation, according to a new briefing from four leading research organisations.
A new briefing, produced for the BBC by The King’s Fund, the Health Foundation, the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Nuffield Trust1, looks at whether the NHS is currently meeting public expectations and who is responsible for keeping us healthy. It argues that the success of the smoking ban and some early evidence that the soft drinks industry levy has led to manufacturers reducing the amount of sugar in their products suggests that tax and regulation can be an effective part of a strategy for improving the population’s health.
New polling commissioned by the Health Foundation for the briefing suggests the public supports this type of intervention. Key results include:
- 62 per cent of UK adults 15+ support the soft drinks levy;
- 54 per cent said they support a minimum unit price for alcohol, a measure already implemented in Scotland and soon to be introduced in Wales;
- 70 per cent support limiting fast food outlets in areas near schools;
- 68 per cent support restricting advertising of unhealthy food and drink and 67 per cent would back a ban on advertising of junk food on TV before 9pm.
The polling suggests that the vast majority of people – 86 per cent – believe they have a ‘great deal of responsibility’ for keeping healthy. But the authors point to a worrying gap between expectations and reality in how people manage their health. While the majority of people polled said they find it easy to engage in healthy behaviours such as eating well or exercising, evidence shows that seven in ten adults in England do not meet government guidelines in relation to two or more key risk factors of poor diet, physical inactivity, excessive alcohol consumption and smoking.
While the NHS and individuals have important roles to play, the briefing highlights evidence that the most significant influence on people's health is the economic, physical and social environment in which they live – the so-called wider determinants of health. This helps explain yawning gaps in healthy life expectancy across the UK which mean that life expectancy for men in the most deprived communities is nine years less than in the wealthiest, and for women it is seven years less.
As the NHS turns 70, public support for its founding principles is unwavering. While public satisfaction with the NHS remains high, recent public and patient surveys suggest that people are becoming less satisfied with services.
Helen Mckenna, Senior Policy Adviser at The King's Fund, said:
‘It is essential that national and local government use all the means at their disposal to improve the public’s health. This should include being bolder in using tax and regulation where this can be effective. Although politicians may balk at the idea of the 'nanny state', our research suggests these types of intervention may enjoy stronger public support than they often assume.
'As it approaches its 70th birthday, the NHS still enjoys overwhelming public support but funding pressures are beginning to take a toll and there are signs that people are becoming less satisfied with NHS services.’
- 1.To mark the BBC’s coverage of the NHS’s 70th birthday in July 2018, researchers from the Health Foundation, Institute for Fiscal Studies, The King’s Fund and the Nuffield Trust have joined forces for the first time, using combined expertise to shed light on some of the big questions on the NHS. Today’s analysis follows outputs published earlier this week on how the NHS compares internationally and NHS funding, with briefings on social care and technology to follow later this week.
Notes to editors
Are we expecting too much from the NHS? is authored by Helen McKenna (The King’s Fund), with contributions from Emma Spencelayh and Peter Stilwell (the Health Foundation), Mark Dayan (The Nuffield Trust), Elaine Kelly (Institute for Fiscal Studies), and David Buck, Dan Wellings and Leo Ewbank (The King’s Fund).
The briefing draws on new polling commissioned by the Health Foundation for the BBC’s project. The research was conducted on CAPIbus, Ipsos MORI’s weekly face to face survey. 2,083 adults 15+ were Interviewed across the UK between 11th and 29th May 2018 in participant’s homes using a Computer Aided Personal Interviewing (CAPI) methodology. Data have been weighted to age, working status, government office region and social grade within gender, with household tenure and ethnicity according to known population profiles.
For further information or to request an interview, please contact Gemma Umali at The King’s Fund press office on 020 7307 2585 (07584 146 035 if calling out of hours) or email@example.com
Latest News from
IFS - Low rates of capital gains tax on business income lead to large tax savings but do not boost investment22/10/2019 10:35:00
People who work for their own businesses are taxed at lower rates than employees. One of the most prominent examples of this is Entrepreneurs’ Relief – a reduced, 10%, rate of capital gains tax available to, effectively, all business owners. This is part of a broader regime that taxes most self-employment income, dividends and capital gains at lower rates than wage income and that is commonly defended as a means to promote investment and entrepreneurship.
Demos - Almost three quarters of key government suppliers operating in tax havens22/10/2019 09:35:00
New report by think tank Demos, Value Added, has found that an overwhelming majority (73.5%) of the government’s Strategic Suppliers have operations in tax havens.
IPPR - May and Johnson’s Brexit Deals compared: A harder deal, less alignment and more barriers to trade18/10/2019 15:15:00
IPPR analysis finds Johnson’s deal points to harder Brexit than May’s
IFG - Government cannot afford to support business in a no-deal Brexit17/10/2019 13:35:00
If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the government will not be able to support all affected industries, argues a new report by the Institute for Government. Against a backdrop of steeply deteriorating public finances, the government will be forced into impossible choices about which businesses and industries to save. Without clear principles, the fight over subsidies will be swamped by politics.
NIESR monthly CPI Tracker: Inflation unchanged after fuel price falls17/10/2019 13:10:00
According to figures released yesterday by the ONS, consumer price index inflation remained unchanged at 1.7 per cent in the year to September 2019.
Civitas - Social democracy faces extinction without a new high-growth economic strategy – John Mills17/10/2019 12:35:00
The centre-left faces ‘extinction’ unless it can break free of neoliberal economic dogma and find a way to credibly deliver significantly higher rates of growth in the years ahead, a new book by the businessman and Labour donor John Mills warns.
IFG - No-deal Brexit would be high-stakes gamble with the Union17/10/2019 11:35:00
A no-deal Brexit would be highly controversial in all three devolved nations and increase risks to the Union itself, argues a new report by the Institute for Government.
The King's Fund responds to the Care Quality Commission's State of care report17/10/2019 10:35:00
Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King’s Fund commented on the new State of care report from the Care Quality Commission (CQC)
Civitas - Muslims targeted for supporting counter-extremism initiatives – new report17/10/2019 09:35:00
Liberal Muslims working on counter-terrorism and counter-extremism are routinely subjected to abuse and intimidation, a new Civitas study shows.