Kings Fund - New controls unlikely to have much impact on agency spending as NHS heads for financial crunch
More than 60 per cent of NHS trust finance directors think controls on agency spending announced in June will not significantly reduce the amount spent on agency staff, according to the latest quarterly monitoring report from The King’s Fund.
Only one in ten trusts surveyed thought the controls, which set a maximum hourly rate and cap the amount trusts can spend on agency staff, will have much impact.
The regular survey carried out for the report also found that three-quarters of trusts intend to recruit more permanent nurses in the next six months, suggesting that the NHS is continuing to prioritise quality of patient care despite rising financial pressures. With the majority of trusts forecasting deficits and no prospect of extra funding, it is clear that the NHS is heading for a financial crunch by the end of the year.
Key findings from this quarter’s survey include the following.
- A third of trusts plan to reduce the number of permanent staff overall. The survey suggests that the non-clinical workforce is likely to take the strain, as over half (58 per cent) of these trusts still intending to recruit more permanent nurses.
- For the fourth consecutive quarter, staff morale tops the list of concerns raised by trust finance directors.
- Just over 40 per cent of trust finance directors and around 30 per cent of clinical commissioning group finance leads are concerned about achieving their productivity targets this year.
- Two-thirds (66 per cent) of trusts and 89 per cent of acute trusts (hospitals) are forecasting a deficit this financial year – up from 25 per cent and 21 per cent respectively on the same quarter last year.
The report also reveals that fewer than half (46 per cent) of mental health trusts are confident that commissioners will increase their funding in line with government commitments. This concern is not shared by commissioners, more than 80 per cent of whom are confident of honouring these increases.
The regular data analysis included in the report shows that NHS performance remains precarious. These data show:
- The A&E four-hour waiting time target was missed in the first quarter of 2015/16, the first time this has happened at this time of year for over a decade.
- More than 70,000 patients waited longer than four hours to be admitted to hospital from A&E (so called ‘trolley waits’) during the first quarter of 2015/16, an increase of 47 per cent on the same quarter last year.
- In May 2015 there were delays in discharging nearly 5,000 patients from hospital; this was up on the previous month and 10 per cent higher than the same time last year.
- Following a managed breach of the waiting time targets, the number of patients still waiting more than 18 weeks for treatment reduced to 6.5 per cent in May. Other measures of waiting times for treatment will no longer be used as targets following the review by Bruce Keogh at NHS England earlier this year.
- The proportion of patients receiving cancer treatment within 62 days of an urgent referral from their GP reached a record low of only 82.3 per cent in the final quarter of 2014/15, below the 85 per cent target and the lowest since the target was introduced in 2009.
Commenting on the report, John Appleby, Chief Economist at The King's Fund, said: ‘Rising costs, cuts in the payments they receive for treating patients and increasing demand makes 2015/16 the most challenging year for NHS providers this century, and the majority expect to be in deficit by the end of the year. Despite this, trusts remain focused on improving the quality of care and are planning to recruit more nurses.
‘There are considerable opportunities to make productivity improvements, but continuing to rely on top-down policy levers such as limiting staff pay increases and capping agency fees will not be sufficient. The most promising opportunities lie in changing clinical practice to deliver better outcomes at lower cost, something that can only be achieved by engaging NHS staff in a new mission to deliver better value.’
Notes to editors:
How is the NHS performing? is the sixteenth quarterly monitoring report by The King’s Fund. It covers the first quarter of 2015/16 (April to June) (although time lags in the publication of data mean that reporting on some performance indicators covers different periods).
For further information or to request an interview, please contact the Press and Public Affairs team on 020 7307 2585 (07584 146 035 if calling out of hours).
The report details the latest survey of NHS finance directors and CCG finance leads, which was carried out from 5 June to 22 June 2015. Of 254 NHS trust finance directors contacted, 100 responded. We also contacted 202 CCG finance leads, of whom 53 responded, covering 58 CCGs (28 per cent of CCGs).
The King's Fund is an independent charity working to improve health and health care in England. We help to shape policy and practice through research and analysis; develop individuals, teams and organisations; promote understanding of the health and social care system; and bring people together to learn, share knowledge and debate. Our vision is that the best possible care is available to all.
Latest News from
Reward farmers who help fight climate and nature crisis, urges IPPR think tank13/05/2021 14:35:00
Now the UK has left the EU’s agricultural schemes, the government should seize the opportunity to transform farming to protect the environment and secure the livelihoods of farmers, according to a new IPPR report.
IEA - Nanny statists have “exploited” this pandemic, says new research13/05/2021 13:35:00
Governments are increasingly adopting higher sin taxes and more prohibitions, finds the 2021 Nanny State Index
IFS - Elective hospital admissions dropped by a third last year, while outpatient appointments and non-COVID emergency admissions each fell by a fifth13/05/2021 12:35:00
New analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Harvard University and Imperial College London shows there were 2.9 million fewer planned admissions, 1.2 million fewer non-COVID-19 emergency inpatient admissions and 17.1 million fewer outpatient appointments between March and December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.
Policy needs to adjust following encouraging GDP data, says IEA expert13/05/2021 11:35:00
Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the latest GDP and trade data from the Office for National Statistics
Queen's speech: IPPR reaction to ‘policy gulf’ on environment, planning, health and care agenda13/05/2021 10:35:00
Think tank welcomes some targets and commitments, but says bold action and clear policy must follow
Ill-considered ‘junk food’ ad ban “has to be binned”, says IEA expert13/05/2021 09:35:00
Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs responded to renewed government plans to ban ‘junk food’ advertising
Adam Smith Inst - "Nutty nanny statism": Government plans to ban 'junk food' advertising online and after 9.00pm11/05/2021 16:35:00
The Adam Smith Institute’s Head of Research Matthew Lesh responded to the Government maintaining plans to ban so-called ‘junk food’ from online advertising and before 9.00pm on television
“Unlikely to supercharge economic growth”: IEA experts respond to Queen’s Speech11/05/2021 15:35:00
Mark Littlewood, Director General at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, commented on the Queen’s Speech
JRF - Queen’s Speech: Where is the Employment Bill for low-paid workers?11/05/2021 14:35:00
JRF responds to today's Queen's Speech
The apprenticeship levy should be scrapped completely, says IEA expert11/05/2021 13:35:00
Professor Len Shackleton, Editorial and Research Fellow at free market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs, responded to the news that £1bn of apprenticeship levy funds has gone unspent in the nine months since last May