King's Fund - Radical changes needed to tackle stalling health improvements
The King’s Fund has warned that, without radical change, progress in improving the population’s health is at risk of grinding to a halt.
Health improvements over the last century have meant that each generation has lived longer, healthier lives than their predecessors. But in a new report, The King’s Fund argues that this can no longer be taken for granted, highlighting a number of key measures against which progress has stalled.
- Improvements in life expectancy are grinding to a halt – although this is happening elsewhere, the slump is more pronounced in the UK than most other countries.
- There has been little or no improvement in how long people live with illness and disease since 1990.
- Infant mortality rose in 2015 and 2016, as the UK slid further down the international rankings on child health.
- According to the OECD, our adult obesity rates are among the worst in the developed world.
The report also warns that the yawning gap in health outcomes between rich and poor areas is widening again. A woman in Wokingham can now expect to enjoy nearly 17 more years of healthy life than a woman in Manchester.
Ahead of the forthcoming NHS long-term plan, the report argues that these challenges cannot be tackled by the NHS alone. With many people living for years with preventable health conditions, it makes the case for a new approach that moves away from diagnosing and treating sickness towards promoting wellbeing and preventing ill health.
The report authors call on the Government to use next year’s Spending Review to reverse cuts to public health grants. Currently, local authority spending per head on public health services is on track to fall by almost a quarter in real terms between 2014/15 and 2019/20.
Other recommendations to improve the population’s health include:
- Introducing binding national targets for improving health, backed by a new strategy to reduce health inequalities.
- Making bolder use of tax and regulation to support public health, learning lessons from the successful approach to cutting smoking and the recent levy on soft drinks.
- Strong political leadership to ensure improving the population’s health and reducing health inequalities are priorities across government, as well as the health and care system.
- Local politicians should champion population health by working with the NHS and other agencies to improve the health of their constituents.
David Buck, Senior Fellow at The King’s Fund and lead author of the report said:
‘After a century of improving health, progress on key outcomes are grinding to a halt. Life expectancy is stalling, our health outcomes are mediocre compared with similar countries and health inequalities are widening.
‘A new vision for the population’s health is needed that pays more attention to the wider determinants of health and the role of people and communities. The NHS long-term plan is important to this, but can’t do it alone. The Government must also reverse cuts to local government public health budgets and make tackling health inequalities a central aim. Our new report provides a framework for charting a new course towards reducing inequalities and achieving health outcomes on a par with the best in the world.’
Notes to editors
For further information, or to request an interview, please contact Rachel Case by email at email@example.com or by telephone on 020 7307 2603.
The report calls for a radical shift in how the government approaches the health of the population. The Vision for Population Health identifies four ‘pillars’ to improve population health. These are:
- The wider determinants of health, such as poverty, education, housing and transport.
- Our health behaviours and lifestyles, including smoking, drinking, diet and exercise.
- The places and communities in which we live, including social relationships and the local environment.
- An integrated health and care system, which looks at how the NHS, social care and population health can work together to improve outcomes.
The King's Fund is an independent charity working to improve health and care in England. We help to shape policy and practice through research and analysis; develop individuals, teams and organisations; promote understanding of the health and social care system; and bring people together to learn, share knowledge and debate. Our vision is that the best possible health and care is available to all.
Latest News from
NIESR reacts to the latest ONS CPI inflation statistics released14/02/2019 13:25:00
According to figures released this morning by the ONS, consumer price index inflation fell by 0.3 percentage points to 1.8 per cent in the year to January 2019.
The King's Fund responds to the Topol review14/02/2019 09:35:00
Harry Evans, researcher at The King’s Fund, commented on the Topol review into technology and the health care workforce
IFS - If the coming spending review is to end austerity Chancellor will need to find extra billions12/02/2019 10:35:00
Philip Hammond is yet to confirm how much money will be made available to be allocated among departments at his forthcoming Spending Review. This decision, which may well be announced in the Spring Statement on 13 March, could be one of the most important non-Brexit policy decisions to be made in the current Parliament.
IEA - Ever-expanding Green Belt must be tackled to solve UK housing crisis, says new report12/02/2019 09:35:00
A IEA new report on the UK's housing crisis
Fears of empty supermarket shelves after no-deal Brexit are overblown, says new IEA briefing07/02/2019 10:35:00
IEA release report on the effect of a "No-Deal" Brexit on food supply
IEA responds to the Charity Commission’s Official Warning07/02/2019 09:35:00
A note from IEA Chairman Neil Record
NIESR: Prospects for the World Economy06/02/2019 16:05:00
In the past two years global economic growth has been boosted by tailwinds from accommodative financial conditions and the US fiscal stimulus.
NIESR: Prospects for the UK Economy06/02/2019 12:25:00
The UK economy has lost momentum since our last forecast because Brexit-related uncertainty has intensified and also because global economic growth has slowed.