Lancashire County Council criticised for failing to support vulnerable children properly
Lancashire County Council has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for not providing the right support for two vulnerable siblings when they moved to live with their aunt and uncle.
The siblings, who had a turbulent background and had spent time in foster care, became subject to a Special Guardianship Order (SGO) when they moved to live with their relatives in another area.
Their uncle initially complained to the Ombudsman in 2016 about the lack of support provided by the council, after it became apparent both children had significant needs, and the family would need specialist support and respite because of their past experiences.
Lancashire County Council agreed to a number of recommendations to put things right. However, by February 2018 the uncle returned his complaint to the Ombudsman, as many of the agreed remedies had still not been implemented.
Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, yesterday said:
“People can only have confidence in their councils if they honour their commitments. In this case the council’s lack of urgency in carrying out its promises within a reasonable timeframe has undermined the family’s trust, and calls into question its willingness to accept fault and put things right.
“This is particularly important in cases such as this where vulnerable children are involved.
“I now urge Lancashire council to act swiftly and complete the recommendations they agreed in 2016 and those I have now made to improve both the family’s situation and others who complain about its services.”
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s role is to remedy injustice and share learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case Lancashire County Council should apologise to the couple for failing to provide support to their niece before she turned 18, which caused them distress and write to them jointly with the council where the family now live, setting out how the family will be supported in future by issuing an amended SGO support plan.
It should look at the couple’s training needs and provide that training. It should also pay the couple any backdated respite for the niece that has not been taken along with a further £300 for the distress caused by delays. It should also apologise for the lack of explanation on how the amount the family would be paid was calculated, and a further £100 for time and trouble.
The council should also backdate (to October 2016) the allowances owed and consider what financial support it should provide the couple now the nephew is the only child in the household. It is also asked to backdate this from when the niece left home.
For the nephew, the council should identify an appropriate respite placement and pay the family £250 each month until it does; and make up for the respite provision missed.
The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case, the council should change its procedures to ensure it keeps complainants informed of the progress of implementing outcomes from their complaints and reviews those procedures for effectiveness.
Latest News from
Draft Public Service Ombudsman Bill laid in Parliament05/12/2016 12:37:21
A new complaints body will provide the public with greater confidence that their voices have been heard.
Council makes serious unsubstantiated allegations about asylum seeker during Ombudsman investigation23/01/2020 12:15:00
Sandwell council refused to let a vulnerable mother have her representative present at an important meeting – and made serious and unsubstantiated allegations about both of them during an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Nottinghamshire man’s care package reduced because of financial pressures, Ombudsman finds23/01/2020 09:15:00
A Nottinghamshire man with autism was left relying on his parents to part-fund his care when the county council cut his package without identifying a suitable alternative, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.
Ombudsman reminds councils of their foster carer school transport duties17/01/2020 13:20:00
Councils across England are being reminded about the financial support they must provide to foster carers’ school transport expenses following an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman into Wolverhampton council.
Ombudsman issues rare further report into Medway Council17/01/2020 12:20:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has made the rare move to issue a further report because Medway Council has not implemented the Ombudsman's recommendations or followed the correct process to disagree with them.
Ombudsman finds multiple failures with Richmond children’s services provider15/01/2020 09:15:00
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has strongly criticised Richmond council’s children’s service provider, Achieving for Children, for not effectively supporting children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).
Ombudsman highlighting the human cost of poor housing benefit practice09/01/2020 14:15:00
Families are facing the very real prospect of becoming homeless because of the way some authorities are dealing with appeals against housing benefit claims, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is warning.
Young family left homeless by Haringey benefits blunder08/01/2020 10:25:00
A young family, including a disabled child, had to leave their home following a miscalculation of their housing benefits by London Borough of Haringey, reports the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Pregnant homeless woman left to sleep on hard floor by LB Tower Hamlets07/01/2020 11:15:00
A pregnant woman, who approached Tower Hamlets council for help when she was made homeless, was left in an unfurnished flat, miles from her support network, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.