Public and Commercial Services Union
Land Registry sell-off would increase risks and costs to homebuyers
Privatising the Land Registry would increase risks and costs to homebuyers, PCS says in its formal response to the governments consultation.
The proposal is based on a political choice, not economic necessity, driven by the Treasury's demand for cuts and short-term returns, the union says. It is neither required nor being requested by anyone who works in the industry.
The union is developing a major campaign against the plans, alongside legal professionals. More than 200,000 people have already signed a petition against a sell-off.
Shelving similar proposals in July 2014, ministers revealed only 5% of respondents to its consultation agreed privatisation would make the Land Registry more efficient and effective.
The union notes the Land Registry: has returned more than £240 million to the Treasury over the last two years; has reduced fees to customers; enjoys a 95% customer satisfaction; has increased total land registration in England and Wales to 85% from 48% in 2005; and is already innovating through better use of technology.
- The government has not carried out an assessment of the risks of privatisation, and key issues the union raises include:
- No guarantee that fees to homebuyers and others will not increase – the union believes it is inevitable as a private company would be required to make a profit
- Short-term financial gain would be far outweighed by the long-term consequences of undermining a trusted, impartial and highly successful public service, putting at risk the stability of the housing market and the wider economy
- Conflict of interest and lack of incentive of a commercial organisation to provide open data on land and property ownership, including efforts to tackle offshore ownership of the kind exposed in the Panama papers
- Regulation of other privatised industries, such as energy and rail, has not delivered on its promises to reduce costs and improve services
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: “This sell-off plan is being driven by short-term political choice, not economic necessity, and is deeply dangerous.
“Allowing a private company to profit from the Land Registry’s legal and statutory duties risks the stability of the housing market and would increase costs to homebuyers and small businesses.”
Latest News from
Public and Commercial Services Union
Panama papers show tax dodging requires global action05/04/2016 16:15:00
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka, commented on the Panama papers revelations
Budget response: further cuts would do more damage to our economy16/03/2016 15:25:00
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka, commented on today’s budget.
Central government transferring risk and blame to councils on welfare support12/01/2016 15:10:00
Central government has transferred risk and blame to councils with its cuts to emergency social security support.
Living wage 'champion' does not pay it to government cleaners23/06/2015 12:25:00
A multi-million pound company is accused of hypocrisy by PCS for championing the living wage but not paying it to its own staff who clean government departments.
Union presents alternative to National Gallery privatisation27/02/2015 15:52:00
PCS has today submitted formal plans that it says would avoid privatisation at the National Gallery.
Warning over safety as CAA presses ahead with outsourcing medical work27/02/2015 14:10:00
PCS and Prospect, the unions that represent staff employed by aviation regulator the Civil Aviation Authority, warned yesterday that passenger safety could be put at risk as the body decides to move towards outsourcing its medical function.
Information watchdog staff to strike for two days over pay03/02/2015 12:02:13
Staff at the Information Commissioner's Office will strike for two days from Tuesday over pay.
National Gallery staff to strike for five days over sell-off29/01/2015 14:20:29
Workers at the National Gallery will strike for a week over plans to hand all visitor services to a private company.