Lessons Learned by Britain's Armed Forces After Bloody Sunday
In a commentary we published earlier this year marking the 50th anniversary of the ‘Bloody Sunday’ fatal shootings, Dr Edward Burke argued that an ‘unwillingness to learn from atrocities in Northern Ireland means that events such as Bloody Sunday continue to impact upon the British Army’. A senior Army commander with extensive experience of the period responds.
How very disappointing to read Dr Edward Burke’s misinformed piece about the failure of the British Army to learn lessons after Bloody Sunday.
When the British armed forces were first deployed to Northern Ireland in 1969 under Operation BANNER – involving all three services – it was solely to help the Royal Ulster Constabulary restore law and order, operating ‘In Aid of the Civil Power’. There was no presumption that this would be a lengthy affair. No specific training existed for troops deployed: the author would do well to view the black and white training film – made to instruct our armed forces on how to deal with counterinsurgency in former colonies – which was the only guide available, and was totally inappropriate.
A ‘yellow card’ was introduced in 1969 – though not a source of law – to be carried individually by everyone in the province, as an instruction to guide service personnel on when they were permitted to open fire. Approved by HMG’s Cabinet of the day, it was revised four times between September 1969 and November 1971, as a result of lessons learned. A further two revisions took place in July 1972 (as a result of Bloody Sunday) and again in November 1972.
The Northern Ireland Training and Advisory Team helped to develop and standardise tactics across the province, frequently enhancing training from the lessons of the previous four months of operations
By the autumn of 1972, the Northern Ireland Training and Advisory Team (NITAT) was established in Kent – and in Sennelager for units stationed in Germany – with a view to ensuring pre-deployment training was focused on up-to-date lessons before deployment. Standardising training for all ranks, it ensured that every unit was thoroughly briefed and prepared for their role and specific area of operations. NITAT helped to develop and standardise tactics across the province, frequently enhancing training from the lessons of the previous four months of operations, using instructors with recent experience.
As late as 1993, the House of Commons Defence Select Committee requested an urgent briefing at NITAT, alarmed at the potential inadequacy of the ‘yellow card’ of the day. Having been put through their paces as part of a routine patrol over more than two hours, harassed by a simulated angry mob, they were disturbed by their experience. Returning to London, they set in train a further amendment to the ‘yellow card’ – as a result of lessons learned.
Major General Dair Farrar-Hockley MC, General Officer Commanding, 2nd Infantry Division (1996–1999)
The views expressed in this Commentary are the author’s, and do not represent those of RUSI or any other institution.
Have an idea for a Commentary you’d like to write for us? Send a short pitch to email@example.com and we’ll get back to you if it fits into our research interests. Full guidelines for contributors can be found here.
Original article link: https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/lessons-learned-britains-armed-forces-after-bloody-sunday
Latest News from
Shifting Sands: The UK’s Role in a Changing Gulf28/03/2023 14:25:00
The agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran to restore diplomatic relations, facilitated by China and signed in Beijing on 11 March, was a jolt to the geopolitics of the Middle East. While much attention is rightly focused on what the agreement – and China’s role in it, in particular – says about US influence in the region, it also has significant implications for the UK, for which the Gulf remains of high strategic importance.
The Politics of African National Debt24/03/2023 14:25:00
More than 20 years after global efforts to relieve African national debts, the issue is once again in the headlines. Which countries are at risk, what is at stake, and why is it all so political?
Can Brazil and China Really Pull Off an Alternative Peace Club?23/03/2023 14:25:00
Strategic relations between Lula da Silva and Xi Jinping are likely to strengthen behind their attempt to mediate an end to the Ukraine–Russia war.
Call for Presentations: The UK PONI 2023 Annual Conference22/03/2023 13:25:00
The UK PONI Annual Conference has established itself as the premier UK forum for developing the next generation of nuclear expertise in academia, industry, government and the military. By bringing together emerging and established experts from across the nuclear field, this conference series promotes an informed and diverse dialogue on the most pertinent nuclear issues of the day.
Helping AUKUS Last the Distance22/03/2023 09:25:00
While defence matters usually receive limited meaningful public debate in Australia, the government will need to take a different approach if it is to ensure the long-term success of AUKUS.
Mobilisation in Russia: How to Convince Men to Fight in Ukraine?21/03/2023 14:25:00
The Russian government has launched a video campaign drawing on a number of themes in an attempt to persuade its citizens to enlist. But has it achieved the desired effect?
Out of Africa: Financial Networks of Islamic State 2.021/03/2023 09:25:00
The killing of a prominent Islamic State financier in Somalia sheds light on the group’s transnational financial networks and shifting centre of gravity.
Further Together: An Opening for NATO–EU Sanctions Cooperation20/03/2023 14:25:00
Russia is exploiting Euro-Atlantic supply chain weaknesses that could be resolved by effective sanctions cooperation between NATO and the EU.
Georgia’s Foreign Agents Law: A Dangerous Gamble17/03/2023 14:25:00
Tens of thousands of Georgians took to the streets last week to protest the Georgian government’s attempts to pass a new law on what it termed ‘transparency in foreign influence’, more commonly referred to as a ‘foreign agents’ law and widely believed to be modelled on Russia’s repressive legislation.